CDC Admits They Have Zero Proof That Unvaccinated, Naturally Immune Spread COVID-19 After FOIA Request

CDC Director Rochelle Walensky admitted months ago the experimental COVID-19 injections don’t stop transmission of the virus.

And real-world data from places like Vermont, Israel, and the United Kingdom show high vaccination rates do NOT slow the spread.

In fact, you can argue the mass COVID-19 injection rollout has exacerbated the dilemma.

Yet, the CDC remains determined to prove vaccine-induced immunity provides greater protection than natural immunity.

They released this study last week in a desperate attempt to convince Americans vaccine-induced COVID-19 immunity was superior.

In this major study, people who were previously infected with COVID were more than 5 times more likely to be hospitalized. In other words, vaccine recipients have better immunity. https://t.co/w4IW3SO56U via @CDCgov

— Pamela Fayerman (@MedicineMatters) November 4, 2021

People who had #Covid19 are 5.5 times as likely to get covid then Vaccinated.
CDC released a peer-reviewed study that found that while the immunity granted from infection did prevent serious Covid symptoms, the immunity did not last as long as those who have received the vaccine. pic.twitter.com/1ZPmGiEWE1

— 🤗🌎#NOT4ME4US🌊💡(Parody of a Parody) (@MattMorgan23) November 3, 2021

💉 Immunity by infection protects less than vaccine-mediated immunity.

A study from the @CDCgov concludes that non-vaccinated adults with a previous #SARSCoV2 infection are 5.5-times more likely to contract #COVID as compared to fully vaccinated adults without prior infection. pic.twitter.com/ts0PVddDyC

— ISGlobal (@ISGLOBALorg) November 3, 2021

From the CDC:

Previous infection with SARS-CoV-2 (the virus that causes COVID-19) or COVID-19 vaccination can provide immunity and protection from subsequent SARS-CoV-2 infection and illness. CDC used data from the VISION Network* to examine hospitalizations in adults with COVID-19–like illness and compared the odds of receiving a positive SARS-CoV-2 test result, and thus having laboratory-confirmed COVID-19, between unvaccinated patients with a previous SARS-CoV-2 infection occurring 90–179 days before COVID-19–like illness hospitalization, and patients who were fully vaccinated with an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine 90–179 days before hospitalization with no previous documented SARS-CoV-2 infection. Hospitalized adults aged ≥18 years with COVID-19–like illness were included if they had received testing at least twice: once associated with a COVID-19–like illness hospitalization during January–September 2021 and at least once earlier (since February 1, 2020, and ≥14 days before that hospitalization). Among COVID-19–like illness hospitalizations in persons whose previous infection or vaccination occurred 90–179 days earlier, the odds of laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 (adjusted for sociodemographic and health characteristics) among unvaccinated, previously infected adults were higher than the odds among fully vaccinated recipients of an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine with no previous documented infection (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 5.49; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.75–10.99). These findings suggest that among hospitalized adults with COVID-19–like illness whose previous infection or vaccination occurred 90–179 days earlier, vaccine-induced immunity was more protective than infection-induced immunity against laboratory-confirmed COVID-19. All eligible persons should be vaccinated against COVID-19 as soon as possible, including unvaccinated persons previously infected with SARS-CoV-2.

The non-peer reviewed study with at least seven limitations contradicts 100+ studies stating natural immunity as superior.

now up to 122 studies affirming the superiority of natural immunity, in contrast to one highly flawed, non-peer reviewed CDC study.

122 Research Studies Affirm Naturally Acquired Immunity to Covid-19: Documented, Linked, and Quoted https://t.co/cobadoinwS

— Robert W Malone, MD (@RWMaloneMD) November 10, 2021

Let’s take a peek at the conflicts of interest for this CDC study:

All authors have completed and submitted the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors form for disclosure of potential conflicts of interest. Stephanie A. Irving reports support from Westat to Kaiser Permanente Northwest Center for Health Research. Nicola P. Klein reports support from Pfizer to Kaiser Permanente, Northern California for COVID-19 vaccine clinical trials, and institutional support from Merck, GlaxoSmithKline, and Sanofi Pasteur outside the current study. Charlene McEvoy reports support from AstraZeneca to HealthPartners Institute for COVID-19 vaccine trials. Allison L. Naleway reports Pfizer Research funding to Kaiser Permanente Northwest for unrelated study of meningococcal B vaccine safety during pregnancy. Suchitra Rao reports grants from GlaxoSmithKline and Biofire Diagnostics. No other potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

I’ll let you make your own conclusions from that piece of information.

If vaccine-induced immunity was superior, you’d think the CDC can prove unvaccinated, naturally immune individuals spread COVID-19 to others.

You’d think the agency could prove at least one example.

That’s where you’d be incorrect.

A recent FOIA request made by Aaron Siri’s firm, on behalf of ICAN, revealed the CDC has zero proof of unvaccinated, naturally immune individuals transmitting the virus.

That’s a wild admission when the CDC wants to outcast the unvaccinated from society.

“After formal demand, CDC concedes it does not have proof of a single instance of a naturally immune individual spreading the virus”

CDC Admits Crushing Rights of Naturally Immune Without Proof They Transmit the Virus – by Aaron Siri – Injecting Freedom https://t.co/O8nWAH8xHH

— Jess Clarke (@JessClarke007) November 11, 2021

The CDC concedes it does not have proof of a single instance of a naturally immune individual spreading the virus. Contrast that with those receiving the #clotshot, shedding their variant viral loads all over the place. #naturalimmunity for the win!https://t.co/ax7oVbjARQ

— Steve Crozier (@sgec) November 11, 2021

From Aaron Siri’s Substack, Injecting Freedom:

But it gets worse.  The CDC’s excuse for not having a shred of evidence of the naturally immune transmitting the virus is that “this information is not collected.”  What?!  No proof!  But yet the CDC is actively crushing the rights of millions of naturally immune individuals in this country if they do not get the vaccine on the assumption they can transmit the virus.   But despite clear proof the vaccinated spread the virus, the CDC lifts restrictions on the vaccinated?!  That is dystopian.

Here’s the FOIA Request:

Here’s the FOIA Response:

“A search of our records failed to reveal any documents pertaining to your request. The CDC Emergency Operations Center (EOC) conveyed that this information is not collected.”

It’s nice to know the CDC doesn’t bother to collect that data.