Pfizer Board Member Gets FDA Head Censored For Saying Natural Immunity is ‘Superior’

In the latest COVID-19 Twitter Files, a former FDA commissioner, who now sits on the Pfizer board, successfully censored a tweet by his interim successor.

What did the interim successor claim?

That natural immunity is “superior” to COVID-19 jab induced-immunity  by “A LOT” and that there was no “scientific justification” to require proof of vaccination.

The latest revelations came to light in a rendition of the Twitter Files by former New York Times reporter Alex Berenson.

I know lots of you are waiting for the Fauci #TwitterFiles drop… I get it. But I hope you’ll be patient. Those searches are complex (“Fauci” is in a LOT of emails).

And don’t sleep on @pfizer and @ScottGottliebMD – this is the swamp in action, with vast fortunes at stake. pic.twitter.com/uysnCdmtnU

— Alex Berenson (@AlexBerenson) January 9, 2023

Dr. Scott Gottlieb, who joined Pfizer’s board after leaving the FDA, reported the aforementioned statement by physician Brett Giroir to Todd Boyle, Twitter’s White House liaison.

Giroir was the Acting Commissioner of the FDA for about a month in late 2019.

“My first #TwitterFiles report: how @scottgottliebmd – a top Pfizer board member – used the same Twitter lobbyist as the White House to suppress debate on Covid vaccines, INCLUDING FROM A FELLOW HEAD OF @US_FDA!” Alex Berenson tweeted.

“In August 2021, Gottlieb told Todd O’Boyle – a senior manager in Twitter’s public policy department – that a tweet from @drgiroir claiming CORRECTLY that natural immunity was superior to vaccine immunity was ‘corrosive’ and might ‘go viral,'” he added.

2/ In August 2021, Gottlieb told Todd O'Boyle – a senior manager in Twitter's public policy department – that a tweet from @drgiroir claiming CORRECTLY that natural immunity was superior to vaccine immunity was "corrosive" and might "go viral."

— Alex Berenson (@AlexBerenson) January 9, 2023

“Twitter put a misleading tag on the tweet, preventing it from being shared. Gottlieb then went after a tweet about Covid’s low risk to kids from @justin_hart. Pfizer would soon win the okay for its mRNA shots for children, so keeping parents scared was crucial,” Berenson continued.

“In October 2022, @scottgottliebmd claimed on Twitter and CNBC that he was not trying to suppress debate on mRNA jabs. These files prove that Gottlieb – board member at a company that has made $70 billion on the shots – did just that.”

4/ In October 2022, @scottgottliebmd claimed on Twitter and CNBC that he was not trying to suppress debate on mRNA jabs. These files prove that Gottlieb – board member at a company that has made $70 billion on the shots – did just that.

Full story here:https://t.co/UbHlmtjELP

— Alex Berenson (@AlexBerenson) January 9, 2023

Just the News reported:

Twitter applied a still-remaining “misleading” label despite determining Giroir’s tweet didn’t violate misinformation rules, according to Berenson, who was also targeted by Gottlieb. The label prevents retweets, likes and comments, but not quote-tweets.

Boyle again left out Gottlieb’s Pfizer role in forwarding an ultimately failed request to suppress a tweet by lockdown and COVID vaccine skeptic Justin Hart, Berenson reported. About two months before the FDA authorized Pfizer’s vaccine for children ages 5-11, Hart called COVID “a viral pathogen with a child mortality rate of <>0%.”

Gottlieb has a “sworn duty to Pfizer’s bottom line,” University of California San Francisco epidemiologist Vinay Prasad wrote in his newsletter Tuesday, criticizing both Gottlieb’s method and claims.

“The fact of the matter is: we do not have [randomized controlled trials] proving a reduction in severe disease [from vaccination] among those with prior infection,” Prasad wrote. “As such, it is fair to debate the topic — even if you disagree with the tweet in question.”