Skip to main content
BoomMag: Readers and Fans

We Love Trump

We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here.

Dr. Peter McCullough: “It Looks Like the mRNA is Transferring from the Vaccinated to the Unvaccinated”

42.1k views
42,044 views

Dr. Peter McCullough sat down with Action4Canada founder Tanya Gaw for an interview and discussed the potential risks for unvaccinated individuals.

“There was a recent paper,” said McCullough.

“I just have it on my Substack if you want to review it — you go to the Courageous Discourse substack. And the first author is Helene Banoun, a former Inserm scientist. Inserm is a leading research unit in France. And Banoun has summarized this. This is disturbing.”

“It looks like the messenger RNA is transferring from the vaccinated to the unvaccinated now,” McCullough stated. 

Trending: Mike Lindell: “It’s Over” — Tells Steve Bannon He Finally Has All The Evidence He’s Been Waiting On!

“Could you actually take a vaccine inadvertently through close contact, kissing, sexual contact, or breastfeeding?” McCullough asked.

“It looks like the answer is yes,” he added.

Watch on Rumble courtesy of The Vigilant Fox:

Dr. McCullough discussed the findings and shedding concerns in Courageous Discourse:

In the most comprehensive paper on shedding thus far, former Inserm researcher Dr. Helene Banoun has published the basis for which there is great likelihood that mRNA either on lipid nanoparticles or within exosomes is circulatory in blood and is secreted in every body secretion that would naturally expect to contain particles of this size.[iii]

*Image from Courageous Discourse*

Fertig et al, have shown mRNA is circulatory in blood for at least two weeks with no reduction in concentration out to that time point.[iv]  Likewise, Hanna et al, have found mRNA within breast milk.[v]   Less data exist on Spike protein shedding but it is not a far stretch to understand this is well within the realm of reality.  The pivotal questions are:  1) for how long is a recently vaccinated person at risk to shed on to others?  2) can shed mRNA be taken up by the recipient and begin to produce Spike protein just like vaccination? 3) can shed Spike protein cause disease as it does in the vaccinated (e.g. myocarditis, blood clots, etc.)?  It’s time for the lapses by DOD BARDA and NIH BARDA, to immediately be corrected by those agencies funding the necessary independent shedding studies to ensure the public safety of those who wisely deferred on COVID-19 vaccination.  This research should preferably be conducted while the current products are paused and taken off to market to protect others at risk.  Until then, we simply cannot answer these questions for those who sacrificed so much to remain “pure-blood.”

The abstract of the paper, titled: “Current state of knowledge on the excretion of mRNA and spike produced by anti-COVID-19 mRNA vaccines; possibility of contamination of the entourage of those vaccinated by these products” states:

The massive COVID-19 vaccination campaign is the first time that mRNA vaccines havebeen used on a global scale. The mRNA vaccines correspond exactly to the definitionof genetherapy of the American and European regulatory agencies. The regulations requireexcretion studies of these drugs and their products (the translated proteins). These studieshave not been done for mRNA vaccines (nor for adenovirus vaccines). There are numerousreports of symptoms and pathologies identical to the adverse effects of mRNAvaccines inunvaccinated persons in contact with freshly vaccinated persons. It is therefore important toreview the state of knowledge on the possible excretion of vaccine nanoparticles as well asmRNA and its product, the spike protein.

Vaccine mRNA-carrying lipid nanoparticles spread after injection throughout the body according to available animal studies and vaccine mRNA (naked or in nanoparticles or in natural exosomes) is found in the bloodstream as well as vaccine spike in free form or encapsulated in exosomes (shown in human studies). Lipid nanoparticles (or their natural equivalent, exosomes or extracellular vesicles (EVs)) have been shown to be able to be excreted through body fluids (sweat, sputum, breast milk) and to pass the transplacental barrier. These EVs are also able to penetrate by inhalation and through the skin (healthy or injured) as well as orally through breast milk (and why not during sexual intercourse through semen, as this has not been studied). It is urgent to enforce the legislation on gene therapy that applies to mRNA vaccines and to carry out studies on this subject while the generalization of mRNA vaccines is being considered.

Helene Banoun’s paper isn’t the first study to investigate shedding from the experimental COVID-19 shots.

A study conducted by scientists at the University of Colorado suggests individuals inoculated with the experimental COVID-19 shots have been transmitting antibodies generated by the injections through aerosols.

Further info HERE:

Does Study Confirm COVID-19 ‘Vaccine Shedding?’

Dr. Peter McCullough STRIPPED of Medical Credentials for Exposing C-19 Truth

Dr. Peter McCullough, one of the world's most respected and credentialed cardiologists, had his medical credentials stripped for speaking the truth about the dangers of the experimental COVID-19 shots.

According to Wikipedia:

After receiving his MPH, McCullough was a cardiovascular fellow at William Beaumont Hospital in the Detroit metropolitan area until 1997. He then worked successively at the Henry Ford Heart and Vascular Institute in Detroit until 2000, served as section chief of cardiology of the University of Missouri–Kansas City School of Medicine, and returned to William Beaumont Hospital where he worked from 2002 to 2010. He spent the next four years as chief academic and scientific officer of the St. John Providence Health System, Detroit, before joining the Baylor University Medical Center in 2014. McCullough entered into a confidential separation agreement with Baylor Scott & White Medical Center in February 2021. In July, in response to his promotion of misinformation about COVID-19, Baylor sued McCullough to stop him from associating himself with Baylor.

McCullough is a founder and current president of the Cardio Renal Society of America and co-editor-in-chief of the society's journal, Cardiorenal Medicine and editor of the journal Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine. He has conducted several studies on running and heart disease, and co-described the term Phidippides cardiomyopathy, a heart condition found in some high endurance athletes. Other research has included the relationship between heart disease and kidney disease and risk factors for heart disease. He is a member of the conservative advocacy group Association of American Physicians and Surgeons.

McCullough is an author of 677 articles published in scientific peer-reviewed journals and is an advocate for early COVID-19 treatment that included hydroxychloroquine.

He is one of the first doctors who raised concerns about the COVID-19 shots and explained how they all make the toxic spike protein.

“It’s alarming right now – we have had over 4400 deaths and 14,000 hospitalizations….That is probably only the tip of the iceberg,” Dr. McCullough said in an interview with Rose Unplugged on 1320 AM WJAS.

The Gateway Pundit elaborated:

He said pregnant women, women of child-bearing years, children or healthy people under 50 should not get the Covid jab.

Dr. McCullough explained how all Covid-19 vaccines produce the dangerous Wuhan spike protein and what that does to a person’s body.

He added that Covid-19 vaccines have become a social menace and explained how it has been “socially weaponized.”

According to McCullough, the Covid-19 pandemic was premeditated by public health officials working in tandem with medical elites, and the evidence for this had been made clear well before the first reports of a Covid outbreak in late 2019, during an interview with Joe Rogan.

In order to promote mass adoption of the experimental vaccine, McCullough says health officials purposefully suppressed treatments and refrained from compiling a treatment protocol to combat the virus, in hopes that people would be so afraid that they would just take the jab.

Dr. McCullough's award for discussing the dangers of the experimental COVID-19 shots?

He was terminated as the Editor-In-Chief of Cardiorenal Medicine and Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine.

From Steve Kirsch's substack:

So how is he being rewarded for having the courage to speak the truth?

I got this message from him this morning:

I was terminated as the Editor-In-Chief of Cardiorenal Medicine and Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine after years of service and rising impact factors.  There was no phone call, no board meeting, no due process.  Just e-mails or certified letters.  Powerful dark forces are working in academic medicine to expunge any resistance to the vax. 

Yesterday I was stripped of my board certifications in Internal Medicine and Cardiology after decades of perfect clinical performance, board scores, and hundreds of peer reviewed publications.   

None of this will stop until there is a "needle in every arm."

We've covered Dr. McCullough many times here before...

In case you missed some of this:

COVID-19 Jabs' Alteration of DNA Could Extend to Reproductive Cells, Says Dr. Peter McCullough

Dr. Peter McCollough is warning that the COVID-19 jab's altering of human DNA, demonstrated by a recent Swedish study, could affect reproductive cells and thereby genetically alter children.

mRNA From Pfizer COVID-19 Jab Can be Reverse Transcribed into DNA, According to Study

“Alden et al, Lund University, Sweden, confirms one of our worst fears. The exogenous genetic material coding for the dangerous Spike protein is reverse-transcribed into the human genome; possible long-term constitutive expression/synthesis of disease promoting/lethal Spike,” said Dr. McCollough.

"The Swedish study leader, Markus Aldén at Lund University, observed that a fragment of the Pfizer jab’s messenger RNA and led to “changes” in the expression of long interspersed nuclear element-1 (LINE-1), part of the genome. LINE-1 is itself transcribed into a reverse transcriptase, making DNA copies of LINE-1 that can be inserted into the genome at different sites," LifeSiteNews noted.

Dr. McCollough discussed the findings from the Swedish study on a panel of doctors and scientists hosted by Christian broadcaster Joni Lamb.

When asked if the COVID-19 jab can then "affect your baby," Dr. McCollough said, “Yes, this is the alarming finding.”

LifeSiteNews explained:

McCullough did not make a definitive claim about whether the jab would in fact genetically affect babies, but believes it is a possibility. He called for more studies to confirm that “the entire code is installed, and then to actually confirm that … the spike protein now is continuously expressed from human cells because the lipid nanoparticles are taken up everywhere.”

“That means,” continued McCullough, that “somatic cells in your organs,” but also gamete cells, “the cells that actually are the sperm and egg, if they are carrying it, that indeed means that in fact it could be passed to the daughter cells.”

America’s Frontline Doctors foundress and medical freedom heroine Dr. Simone Gold affirmed, “Yes.”

A “biodistribution study” on the effects of the Pfizer jab, released by a Japanese regulatory agency, lends credibility to the possibility that DNA in human reproductive cells can be altered. The study found a particularly high concentration of spike protein, encoded by the jab’s mRNA, in the testes and ovaries.

Thousands of women around the world have also been reporting disrupted menstrual cycles after receiving injections of COVID-19 vaccines, further indicating that the jabs are impacting the reproductive system.

Dr. Joseph Mercola has just shared evidence that the COVID jabs have a “devastating” effect on fertility, including reports that in the five countries with the highest COVID jab uptake, fertility has dropped by an average of an astonishing 15.2 percent compared to the previous year.

Recently released birth rate data from Germany potentially revealed a massive safety signal for infertility.

(WATCH) Dr. Naomi Wolf Discusses Pfizer COVID-19 Jab Documents and How It Compares to Genocide

In the U.S., “provisional data from North Dakota shows a 10 percent decline in live births in February 2022, 13 percent reduction in March, and an 11 percent reduction in April, compared to the corresponding months in 2021,” Mercola reported.

Dr. Peter McCullough On What Is Really Happening When People "Die In Their Sleep"

Dr. Peter McCullough has sounded the alarm on mRNA vaccines from the beginning.

A noted cardiologist, medical journal editor and Senate witness, Dr. McCullough has been warning that mRNA vaccines have significant side effects, including myocarditis.

Most significantly, the vaccines have the potential to damage the heart.

Watch Dr. McCullough explain:

That's scary.

Dr. McCullough says people don't feel the damage -- the first time anyone knows there is something wrong is when people die in their sleep.

What exactly is happening when people die in their sleep?

The Epoch Times summarized Dr. McCullough's answer this way:

Though it may seem counterintuitive, Dr. McCullough said that sudden deaths that happen during sleep are biochemically similar to the sudden deaths during or just after vigorous exercise.

The reason people die seemingly inexplicably in their sleep, Dr. McCullough explained, is sometimes because of a surge in catecholamines during the end of the sleep cycle. This natural biochemical change is the body’s signal to wake up.

Catecholamines are hormones that are made by the adrenal glands. They are released into the body in response to physical exertion or emotional stress. But they are also released during sleep, just before waking, as a signal to the body and the brain that it is time to get up.

These catecholamines can increase our heart rate, blood pressure, and breathing rate, among other things.

In the body there are three catecholamines: dopamine, epinephrine, and norepinephrine. A surge in catecholamines, whether it happens during sleep or during exercise, can stress the heart and cause it to beat arrhythmically, Dr. McCullough said.

To help as many people as possible get their hearts as strong as possible, Dr. McCullough has just announced his "Healthy Heart & Muscle Formula" (ordering through this link and the links below also benefits We Love Trump).

Dr. McCullough says:

My Healthy Heart and Muscle Formula is designed to keep your body’s cardiovascular performance and muscle functionality at its optimum condition. We all live busy and stressful lives but critical nutrients in this newest formula can also prevent overtiredness and fatigue that keep you from seizing the day. I combined D-Ribose Powder to help you maintain body composition and exercise endurance with the power of Coenzyme Q10 and Selenium Citrate to help increase overall cardiac functions.

Together with a Vitamin B Complex to fortify muscles and L-Carnitine to provide energy for heart, muscle, and even brain. this signature formula is all about keeping those core systems healthy. As a physician, I recommend these ingredients to people looking to maintain their hard-earned gains, recovering from illness, or boosting their nutrient intake as part of managing conditions related to your health.

To order Dr. McCullough's "Healthy Heart & Muscle Formula," click here.

And this:

From The NIH Website: "COVID is one of the most manipulated infectious disease events in history"

Wow, you are not going to believe what was just posted on the NIH Website!

Maybe it slipped through the filters and will get taken down as soon as we expose it, but they say even a broken clock is right twice a day and it looks like this broken clock just actually admitted the TRUTH!

Check this out:

https://twitter.com/KekNational/status/1531259469975388165

Read the text, it is absolutely brutal in its honesty -- from NIH.gov:

The COVID-19 pandemic is one of the most manipulated infectious disease events in history, characterized by official lies in an unending stream lead by government bureaucracies, medical associations, medical boards, the media, and international agencies.[,,] We have witnessed a long list of unprecedented intrusions into medical practice, including attacks on medical experts, destruction of medical careers among doctors refusing to participate in killing their patients and a massive regimentation of health care, led by non-qualified individuals with enormous wealth, power and influence.

For the first time in American history a president, governors, mayors, hospital administrators and federal bureaucrats are determining medical treatments based not on accurate scientifically based or even experience based information, but rather to force the acceptance of special forms of care and “prevention”—including remdesivir, use of respirators and ultimately a series of essentially untested messenger RNA vaccines. For the first time in history medical treatment, protocols are not being formulated based on the experience of the physicians treating the largest number of patients successfully, but rather individuals and bureaucracies that have never treated a single patient—including Anthony Fauci, Bill Gates, EcoHealth Alliance, the CDC, WHO, state public health officers and hospital administrators.[,]

The media (TV, newspapers, magazines, etc), medical societies, state medical boards and the owners of social media have appointed themselves to be the sole source of information concerning this so-called “pandemic”. Websites have been removed, highly credentialed and experienced clinical doctors and scientific experts in the field of infectious diseases have been demonized, careers have been destroyed and all dissenting information has been labeled “misinformation” and “dangerous lies”, even when sourced from top experts in the fields of virology, infectious diseases, pulmonary critical care, and epidemiology. These blackouts of truth occur even when this information is backed by extensive scientific citations from some of the most qualified medical specialists in the world.[] Incredibly, even individuals, such as Dr. Michael Yeadon, a retired ex-Chief Scientist, and vice-president for the science division of Pfizer Pharmaceutical company in the UK, who charged the company with making an extremely dangerous vaccine, is ignored and demonized. Further, he, along with other highly qualified scientists have stated that no one should take this vaccine.

Dr. Peter McCullough, one of the most cited experts in his field, who has successfully treated over 2000 COVID patients by using a protocol of early treatment (which the so-called experts completely ignored), has been the victim of a particularly vicious assault by those benefiting financially from the vaccines. He has published his results in peer reviewed journals, reporting an 80% reduction in hospitalizations and a 75% reduction in deaths by using early treatment.[] Despite this, he is under an unrelenting series of attacks by the information controllers, none of which have treated a single patient.

Neither Anthony Fauci, the CDC, WHO nor any medical governmental establishment has ever offered any early treatment other than Tylenol, hydration and call an ambulance once you have difficulty breathing. This is unprecedented in the entire history of medical care as early treatment of infections is critical to saving lives and preventing severe complications. Not only have these medical organizations and federal lapdogs not even suggested early treatment, they attacked anyone who attempted to initiate such treatment with all the weapons at their disposal—loss of license, removal of hospital privileges, shaming, destruction of reputations and even arrest.[]

A good example of this outrage against freedom of speech and providing informed consent information is the recent suspension by the medical board in Maine of Dr. Meryl Nass’ medical license and the ordering of her to undergo a psychiatric evaluation for prescribing Ivermectin and sharing her expertise in this field.[,] I know Dr, Nass personally and can vouch for her integrity, brilliance and dedication to truth. Her scientific credentials are impeccable. This behavior by a medical licensing board is reminiscent of the methodology of the Soviet KGB during the period when dissidents were incarcerated in psychiatric gulags to silence their dissent.

OTHER UNPRECEDENTED ATTACKS

Another unprecedented tactic is to remove dissenting doctors from their positions as journal editors, reviewers and retracting of their scientific papers from journals, even after these papers have been in print. Until this pandemic event, I have never seen so many journal papers being retracted— the vast majority promoting alternatives to official dogma, especially if the papers question vaccine safety. Normally a submitted paper or study is reviewed by experts in the field, called peer review. These reviews can be quite intense and nit picking in detail, insisting that all errors within the paper be corrected before publication. So, unless fraud or some other major hidden problem is discovered after the paper is in print, the paper remains in the scientific literature.

We are now witnessing a growing number of excellent scientific papers, written by top experts in the field, being retracted from major medical and scientific journals weeks, months and even years after publication. A careful review indicates that in far too many instances the authors dared question accepted dogma by the controllers of scientific publications—especially concerning the safety, alternative treatments or efficacy of vaccines.[,] These journals rely on extensive adverting by pharmaceutical companies for their revenue. Several instances have occurred where powerful pharmaceutical companies exerted their influence on owners of these journals to remove articles that in any way question these companies’ products.[,,]

Worse still is the actual designing of medical articles for promoting drugs and pharmaceutical products that involve fake studies, so-called ghostwritten articles.[,] Richard Horton is quoted by the Guardian as saying “journals have devolved into information laundering operations for the pharmaceutical industry.”[,] Proven fraudulent “ghostwritten” articles sponsored by pharmaceutical giants have appeared regularly in top clinical journals, such as JAMA, and New England Journal of Medicine—never to be removed despite proven scientific abuse and manipulation of data.[,]

Ghostwritten articles involve using planning companies whose job it is to design articles containing manipulated data to support a pharmaceutical product and then have these articles accepted by high-impact clinical journals, that is, the journals most likely to affect clinical decision making of doctors. Further, they supply doctors in clinical practice with free reprints of these manipulated articles. The Guardian found 250 companies engaged in this ghostwriting business. The final step in designing these articles for publication in the most prestigious journals is to recruit well recognized medical experts from prestigious institutions, to add their name to these articles. These recruited medical authors are either paid upon agreeing to add their name to these pre- written articles or they do so for the prestige of having their name on an article in a prestigious medical journal.[]

Of vital importance is the observation by experts in the field of medical publishing that nothing has been done to stop this abuse. Medical ethicists have lamented that because of this widespread practice “you can’t trust anything.” While some journals insist on disclosure information, most doctors reading these articles ignore this information or excuse it and several journals make disclosure more difficult by requiring the reader to find the disclosure statements at another location. Many journals do not police such statements and omissions by authors are common and without punishment.

As concerns the information made available to the public, virtually all the media is under the control of these pharmaceutical giants or others who are benefitting from this “pandemic”. Their stories are all the same, both in content and even wording. Orchestrated coverups occur daily and massive data exposing the lies being generated by these information controllers are hidden from the public. All data coming over the national media (TV, newspaper and magazines), as well as the local news you watch every day, comes only from “official” sources—most of which are lies, distortions or completely manufactured out of whole cloth—all aimed to deceive the public.

Television media receives the majority of its advertising budget from the international pharmaceutical companies—this creates an irresistible influence to report all concocted studies supporting their vaccines and other so-called treatments.[] In 2020 alone the pharmaceutical industries spent 6.56 billion dollars on such advertising.[,] Pharma TV advertising amounted to 4.58 billion, an incredible 75% of their budget. That buys a lot of influence and control over the media. World famous experts within all fields of infectious diseases are excluded from media exposure and from social media should they in any way deviate against the concocted lies and distortions by the makers of these vaccines. In addition, these pharmaceutical companies spend tens of millions on social media advertising, with Pfizer leading the pack with $55 million in 2020.[]

While these attacks on free speech are terrifying enough, even worse is the virtually universal control hospital administrators have exercised over the details of medical care in hospitals. These hirelings are now instructing doctors which treatment protocols they will adhere to and which treatments they will not use, no matter how harmful the “approved” treatments are or how beneficial the “unapproved” treatments are.[,]

Never in the history of American medicine have hospital administrators dictated to its physicians how they will practice medicine and what medications they can use. The CDC has no authority to dictate to hospitals or doctors concerning medical treatments. Yet, most physicians complied without the slightest resistance.

The federal Care Act encouraged this human disaster by offering all US hospitals up to 39,000 dollars for each ICU patient they put on respirators, despite the fact that early on it was obvious that the respirators were a major cause of death among these unsuspecting, trusting patients. In addition, the hospitals received 12,000 dollars for each patient that was admitted to the ICU—explaining, in my opinion and others, why all federal medical bureaucracies (CDC, FDA, NIAID, NIH, etc) did all in their power to prevent life- saving early treatments.[] Letting patients deteriorate to the point they needed hospitalization, meant big money for all hospitals. A growing number of hospitals are in danger of bankruptcy, and many have closed their doors, even before this “pandemic”.[] Most of these hospitals are now owned by national or international corporations, including teaching hospitals.[]

It is also interesting to note that with the arrival of this “pandemic” we have witnessed a surge in hospital corporate chains buying up a number of these financially at-risk hospitals.[,] It has been noted that billions in Federal Covid aid is being used by these hospital giants to acquire these financially endangered hospitals, further increasing the power of corporate medicine over physician independence. Physicians expelled from their hospitals are finding it difficult to find other hospitals staffs to join since they too may be owned by the same corporate giant. As a result, vaccine mandate policies include far larger numbers of hospital employees. For example, Mayo Clinic fired 700 employees for exercising their right to refuse a dangerous, essentially untested experimental vaccine.[,] Mayo Clinic did this despite the fact that many of these employees worked during the worst of the epidemic and are being fired when the Omicron variant is the dominant strain of the virus, has the pathogenicity of a common cold for most and the vaccines are ineffective in preventing the infection.

In addition, it has been proven that the vaccinated asymptomatic person has a nasopharyngeal titer of the virus as high as an infected unvaccinated person. If the purpose of the vaccine mandate is to prevent viral spread among the hospital staff and patients, then it is the vaccinated who present the greatest risk of transmission, not the unvaccinated. The difference is that a sick unvaccinated person would not go to work, the asymptomatic vaccinated spreader will.

What we do know is that major medical centers, such as Mayo Clinic, receive tens of millions of dollars in NIH grants each year as well as monies from the pharmaceutical makers of these experimental “vaccines”. In my view, that is the real consideration driving these policies. If this could be proven in a court of law the administrators making these mandates should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law and sued by all injured parties.

The hospital bankruptcy problem has grown increasingly acute due to hospitals vaccine mandates and resulting large number of hospitals staff, especially nurses, refusing to be forcibly vaccinated.[,] This is all unprecedented in the history of medical care. Doctors within hospitals are responsible for the treatment of their individual patients and work directly with these patients and their families to initiate these treatments. Outside organizations, such as the CDC, have no authority to intervene in these treatments and to do so exposes the patients to grave errors by an organization that has never treated a single COVID-19 patient.

When this pandemic started, hospitals were ordered by the CDC to follow a treatment protocol that resulted in the deaths of hundreds of thousands of patients, most of whom would have recovered had proper treatments been allowed.[,] The majority of these deaths could have been prevented had doctors been allowed to use early treatment with such products as Ivermectin, hydroxy-chloroquine and a number of other safe drugs and natural compounds. It has been estimated, based on results by physicians treating the most covid patients successfully, that of the 800,000 people that we are told died from Covid, 640,000 could have not only been saved, but could have, in many cases, returned to their pre-infection health status had mandated early treatment with these proven methods been used. This neglect of early treatment constitutes mass murder. That means 160,000 would have actually died, far less than the number dying at the hands of bureaucracies, medical associations and medical boards that refused to stand up for their patients. According to studies of early treatment of thousands of patients by brave, caring doctors, seventy-five to eighty percent of the deaths could have been prevented.[,]

Incredibly, these knowledgeable doctors were prevented from saving these Covid-19 infected people. It should be an embarrassment to the medical profession that so many doctors mindlessly followed the deadly protocols established by the controllers of medicine.

One must also keep in mind that this event never satisfied the criteria for a pandemic. The World Health Organization changed the criteria to make this a pandemic. To qualify for a pandemic status the virus must have a high mortality rate for the vast majority of people, which it didn’t (with a 99.98% survival rate), and it must have no known existing treatments—which this virus had—in fact, a growing number of very successful treatments.

The draconian measures established to contain this contrived “pandemic” have never been shown to be successful, such as masking the public, lockdowns, and social distancing. A number of carefully done studies during previous flu seasons demonstrated that masks, of any kind, had never prevented the spread of the virus among the public.[]

In fact, some very good studies suggested that the masks actually spread the virus by giving people a false sense of security and other factors, such as the observation that people were constantly breaking sterile technique by touching their mask, improper removal and by leakage of infectious aerosols around the edges of the mask. In addition masks were being disposed of in parking lots, walking trails, laid on tabletops in restaurants and placed in pockets and purses.

Within a few minutes of putting on the mask, a number of pathogenic bacteria can be cultured from the masks, putting the immune suppressed person at a high risk of bacterial pneumonia and children at a higher risk of meningitis.[] A study by researchers at the University of Florida cultured over 11 pathogenic bacteria from the inside of the mask worn by children in schools.[]

It was also known that children were at essentially no risk of either getting sick from the virus or transmitting it.

In addition, it was also known that wearing a mask for over 4 hours (as occurs in all schools) results in significant hypoxia (low blood oxygen levels) and hypercapnia (high CO2 levels), which have a number of deleterious effects on health, including impairing the development of the child’s brain.[,,]

We have known that brain development continues long after the grade school years. A recent study found that children born during the “pandemic” have significantly lower IQs—yet school boards, school principals and other educational bureaucrats are obviously unconcerned.[]

And just in case they delete it, how about some screenshots, shall we?

👇

Dr. Zelenko: You Have To Get The Zinc To The Virus, And The Magic Ingredient Is...

I won't bury the lede.

The magic ingredient to open the door of the cell so the killer-bullet (Zinc) can attack the virus is Quercetin.

Also Ivermectin.

Also Hydroxycholoroquine.

They all work.

But Quercetin is readily available and does not need a doctor's prescription, so Dr. Zelenko used it to formulate his perfect  and proprietary "Z-Stack" blend.

And millions are happy he did.

CURRENT STATUS OF Z-STACK: BACK IN STOCK!

WND explains more:

When Upstate New York physician Dr. Vladimir "Zev" Zelenko drew the attention of President Trump back in the spring of 2020 with a simple protocol of cheap, proven, widely available drugs for COVID-19 that included hydroxychloroquine, he had successfully treated more more than 350 patients, with only one needing hospitalization.

Nearly two years later, amid continued government and media suppression of early treatments, Zelenko told WND in a video interview that he and his team have administered what is now know as the Zelenko Protocol to more than 7,000 COVID patients, with only three deaths.

Moreover, his cocktail of hydroxychloroquine, the popular antibiotic azithromycin and zinc sulfate – along with other combinations of drugs, such as ivermectin – has been adopted by more than 1,000 physicians around the world, along with America's Frontline Doctors.

Among them are Dr. George Fareed, a former professor of virology at Harvard Medical School, and Dr. Brian Tyson. Since April 2020, they collectively have treated more than 7,000 COVID-19 patients in California's Imperial Valley, with only a few deaths. And no patient died who was treated within the first seven days.

Zelenko has explained that the key virus killer is zinc, which has a known antiviral effect, and it's drugs like hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin and quercetin that "open the door to the cell and let the zinc in."

Since the spring of 2020, he also has been using blood thinners, steroids, monoclonal antibodies and other treatments, but he said he has never changed his messaging since making his appeal to President Trump.

And now he has developed an over-the-counter formulation to treat COVID-19 called Z-Stack that contains zinc, quercetin, vitamin D and vitamin C.

The objective, he said, always has been to prevent a COVID-19 infection from progressing to the catastrophic lung injury called acute respiratory distress syndrome, or ARDS, which requires hospitalization and often a ventilator. He found early on that more than 80% of the people with COVID who were put on a respirator were dying. His protocols don't treat ARDS, but they can keep people from ever developing it.

His approach has been to identify high-risk COVID patients, start treatment immediately with an antiviral and anti-inflammatory combination and tailor the treatment to each patient.

In the video interview with WND, Zelenko tells the story of how he appealed to President Trump in a video and 16 hours later received a phone call from Mark Meadows, who was preparing to become the White House chief of staff.

"You can't make this stuff up. I wouldn't believe it, but it happened to me," he said.

That's not all.

Dr. Zelenko has also explained how we could have ended this pandemic LONG ago...

In this writer's opinion, it's a crime against humanity we weren't allowed to.

Also from WND:

Fauci was asked in a March 2020 interview with Philadelphia talk-host Chris Stigall whether or not he would prescribe hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine as a treatment for COVID-19.

"Yeah, of course, particularly if people have no other option. You want to give them hope," said Fauci, the director the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. "In fact, for physicians in this country, these drugs are approved drugs for other reasons. They're anti-malaria drugs and they're drugs against certain autoimmune diseases, like lupus."

WND asked Zelenko what he thinks has happened in the meantime.

"Well, in the meantime 850,000 Americans are dead, and we could have prevented probably 730,000 of them from even going to the hospital and ended this pandemic globally," he replied, alluding to the finding of his paper. "That's what happened."

America's Got Talent Contestant Skilyr Hicks Dead At 23
Prominent medical scientists such as epidemiologist Dr. Harvey Risch of the Yale School of Medicine also have concluded that many lives could have been saved with early treatment.

Eventually, Fauci was regularly contradicting the president regarding hydroxychloroquine. And the FDA, in June 2020, removed emergency use authorization for the distribution of hydroxychloroquine from Strategic National Stockpile, based on "new information." But the decision largely relied on a study published by The Lancet that was embarrassingly retracted by its authors because of faulty data, as WND reported at the time. Later that year, Risch, Dr. George Fareed and Dr. Peter McCullough testified to the U.S. Senate that hydroxychloroquine was being misrepresented in studies and used as a political weapon.

Zelenko pointed to a published paper posted on the National Institutes of Health website in 2005 showing the antiviral properties of chloroquine against SARS is on the level of a vaccine. Hydroxychloroquine is a less toxic analogue of chloroquine. An October 2020 paper posted on the NIH website that reviewed published studies found hydroxychloroquine "is effective, and consistently so when provided early, for COVID-19." A real-time analysis, which to date has assessed 283 peer-reviewed studies, has come to the same conclusion.

"[But] the NIH today recommends not treating COVID unless you're in the hospital with lung damage," Zelenko said. "Really?"

I have the full interview for you right here.

Don't miss this.

From Rumble:

NATIONAL POLL: Do You Still Support President Trump?

And don't miss this...

The famous Z-Stack formula is now in gummies specially formulated for kids!

Available now:

How Dr. Zelenko Bypassed The “Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) Ban” to Beat COVID-19


, ,

 

Join the conversation!

Please share your thoughts about this article below. We value your opinions, and would love to see you add to the discussion!

log in

Forgot password?

reset password

Back to
log in

Hey, Noah here!

Wondering where we went?

Read this and bookmark our new site!

See you over there!

Read Here
Thanks for sharing!
Thanks for sharing!
We invite you to become a WeLoveTrump insider. Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.