Skip to main content
BoomMag: Readers and Fans

We Love Trump

We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here.

Dr. Robert Malone Explains How mRNA Can Turn Into DNA Inside Cancer Cells

9k views
8,937 views

Dr. Robert Malone joined Emerald Robinson on The Absolute Truth and discussed the federal government’s endless COVID-19 lies.

During the interview, Malone explained how it’s possible for mRNA to turn into DNA inside cancer cells.

Malone criticized individuals who deny this isn’t a possibility.

WATCH:

Trending: Adrenachrome “Black Eye Club” Finally Exposed In Detail…

Dr. Malone isn’t the first scientist to talk about this phenomena.

Watch this prior clip from MIT senior research scientist Dr. Stephanie Seneff:

Dr. Stephanie Seneff joined Maria Zeee “to discuss complex findings as to the varied injuries caused by the COVID-19 injections, including explaining DNA damage, neurodegenerative diseases, behavioral issues and more that we are seeing, and will likely see a lot more of in the coming years.”

During the interview, Dr. Seneff discussed a scientific study that showed mRNA from the COVID-19 injection can get converted into DNA in the cell.

Dr. Stephanie Seneff: “You see these fact checkers who say, ‘Hahaha. These people that are saying that this RNA can get converted into DNA in the cell. No way. That doesn’t happen. Don’t worry about it.’ These guys [scientists] showed it happens in six hours with cancer cells.”

New Report Shows mRNA in COVID-19 Jabs Can Convert Into DNA!

Dr. Seneff is referencing the Swedish study, titled “Intracellular Reverse Transcription of Pfizer BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 In Vitro in Human Liver Cell Line.”

While mainstream media hasn’t touched this scientific paper, it’s been a hot debate topic amongst censored researchers.

mRNA From Pfizer COVID-19 Jab Can be Reverse Transcribed into DNA, According to Study

The Abstract states:

Preclinical studies of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine BNT162b2, developed by Pfizer and BioNTech, showed reversible hepatic effects in animals that received the BNT162b2 injection. Furthermore, a recent study showed that SARS-CoV-2 RNA can be reverse-transcribed and integrated into the genome of human cells. In this study, we investigated the effect of BNT162b2 on the human liver cell line Huh7 in vitro. Huh7 cells were exposed to BNT162b2, and quantitative PCR was performed on RNA extracted from the cells. We detected high levels of BNT162b2 in Huh7 cells and changes in gene expression of long interspersed nuclear element-1 (LINE-1), which is an endogenous reverse transcriptase. Immunohistochemistry using antibody binding to LINE-1 open reading frame-1 RNA-binding protein (ORFp1) on Huh7 cells treated with BNT162b2 indicated increased nucleus distribution of LINE-1. PCR on genomic DNA of Huh7 cells exposed to BNT162b2 amplified the DNA sequence unique to BNT162b2. Our results indicate a fast up-take of BNT162b2 into human liver cell line Huh7, leading to changes in LINE-1 expression and distribution. We also show that BNT162b2 mRNA is reverse transcribed intracellularly into DNA in as fast as 6 h upon BNT162b2 exposure.

Anyone who claimed the COVID-19 mRNA jabs could affect your DNA was censored or labeled a “conspiracy theorist.”

However, that’s what the researchers concluded in their analysis of the Pfizer COVID-19 jab’s impact on human liver cells.

“Alden et al, Lund University, Sweden, confirms one of our worst fears. The exogenous genetic material coding for the dangerous Spike protein is reverse-transcribed into the human genome; possible long-term constitutive expression/synthesis of disease promoting/lethal Spike,” said Dr. Peter McCollough.

cont. from the study:

In this study we present evidence that COVID-19 mRNA vaccine BNT162b2 is able to enter the human liver cell line Huh7 in vitro. BNT162b2 mRNA is reverse transcribed intracellularly into DNA as fast as 6 h after BNT162b2 exposure. A possible mechanism for reverse transcription is through endogenous reverse transcriptase LINE-1, and the nucleus protein distribution of LINE-1 is elevated by BNT162b2.
Intracellular accumulation of LNP in hepatocytes has been demonstrated in vivo [36]. A preclinical study on BNT162b2 showed that BNT162b2 enters the human cell line HEK293T cells and leads to robust expression of BNT162b2 antigen [37]. Therefore, in this study, we first investigated the entry of BNT162b2 in the human liver cell line Huh7 cells. The choice of BNT162b2 concentrations used in this study warrants explanation. BNT162b2 is administered as a series of two doses three weeks apart, and each dose contains 30 µg of BNT162b2 in a volume of 0.3 mL, which makes the local concentration at the injection site at the highest 100 µg/mL [31]. A previous study on mRNA vaccines against H10N8 and H7N9 influenza viruses using a similar LNP delivery system showed that the mRNA vaccine can distribute rather nonspecifically to several organs such as liver, spleen, heart, kidney, lung, and brain, and the concentration in the liver is roughly 100 times lower than that of the intra-muscular injection site [38]. In the assessment report on BNT162b2 provided to EMA by Pfizer, the pharmacokinetic distribution studies in rats demonstrated that a relatively large proportion (up to 18%) of the total dose distributes to the liver [26]. We therefore chose to use 0.5, 1, and 2 μg/mL of vaccine in our experiments on the liver cells. However, the effect of a broader range of lower and higher concentrations of BNT162b2 should also be verified in future studies.
In the current study, we employed a human liver cell line for in vitro investigation. It is worth investigating if the liver cells also present the vaccine-derived SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, which could potentially make the liver cells targets for previously primed spike protein reactive cytotoxic T cells. There has been case reports on individuals who developed autoimmune hepatitis [39] after BNT162b2 vaccination. To obtain better understanding of the potential effects of BNT162b2 on liver function, in vivo models are desired for future studies.
In the BNT162b2 toxicity report, no genotoxicity nor carcinogenicity studies have been provided [26]. Our study shows that BNT162b2 can be reverse transcribed to DNA in liver cell line Huh7, and this may give rise to the concern if BNT162b2-derived DNA may be integrated into the host genome and affect the integrity of genomic DNA, which may potentially mediate genotoxic side effects. At this stage, we do not know if DNA reverse transcribed from BNT162b2 is integrated into the cell genome. Further studies are needed to demonstrate the effect of BNT162b2 on genomic integrity, including whole genome sequencing of cells exposed to BNT162b2, as well as tissues from human subjects who received BNT162b2 vaccination.
Human autonomous retrotransposon LINE-1 is a cellular endogenous reverse transcriptase and the only remaining active transposon in humans, able to retrotranspose itself and other nonautonomous elements [40,41], and ~17% of the human genome are comprised of LINE-1 sequences [42]. The nonautonomous Alu elements, short, interspersed nucleotide elements (SINEs), variable-number-of-tandem-repeats (VNTR), as well as cellular mRNA-processed pseudogenes, are retrotransposed by the LINE-1 retrotransposition proteins working in trans [43,44]. A recent study showed that endogenous LINE-1 mediates reverse transcription and integration of SARS-CoV-2 sequences in the genomes of infected human cells [25]. Furthermore, expression of endogenous LINE-1 is often increased upon viral infection, including SARS-CoV-2 infection [45,46,47]. Previous studies showed that LINE-1 retrotransposition activity is regulated by RNA metabolism [48,49], DNA damage response [50], and autophagy [51]. Efficient retrotransposition of LINE-1 is often associated with cell cycle and nuclear envelope breakdown during mitosis [52,53], as well as exogenous retroviruses [54,55], which promotes entrance of LINE-1 into the nucleus. In our study, we observed increased LINE-1 ORF1p distribution as determined by immunohistochemistry in the nucleus by BNT162b2 at all concentrations tested (0.5, 1, and 2 μg/mL), while elevated LINE-1 gene expression was detected at the highest BNT162b2 concentration (2 μg/mL). It is worth noting that gene transcription is regulated by chromatin modifications, transcription factor regulation, and the rate of RNA degradation, while translational regulation of protein involves ribosome recruitment on the initiation codon, modulation of peptide elongation, termination of protein synthesis, or ribosome biogenesis. These two processes are controlled by different mechanisms, and therefore they may not always show the same change patterns in response to external challenges. The exact regulation of LINE-1 activity in response to BNT162b2 merits further study.
The cell model that we used in this study is a carcinoma cell line, with active DNA replication which differs from non-dividing somatic cells. It has also been shown that Huh7 cells display significant different gene and protein expression including upregulated proteins involved in RNA metabolism [56]. However, cell proliferation is also active in several human tissues such as the bone marrow or basal layers of epithelia as well as during embryogenesis, and it is therefore necessary to examine the effect of BNT162b2 on genomic integrity under such conditions. Furthermore, effective retrotransposition of LINE-1 has also been reported in non-dividing and terminally differentiated cells, such as human neurons [57,58].
The Pfizer EMA assessment report also showed that BNT162b2 distributes in the spleen (<1.1%), adrenal glands (<0.1%), as well as low and measurable radioactivity in the ovaries and testes (<0.1%) [26]. Furthermore, no data on placental transfer of BNT162b2 is available from Pfizer EMA assessment report. Our results showed that BNT162b2 mRNA readily enters Huh7 cells at a concentration (0.5 µg/mL) corresponding to 0.5% of the local injection site concentration, induce changes in LINE-1 gene and protein expression, and within 6 h, reverse transcription of BNT162b2 can be detected. It is therefore important to investigate further the effect of BNT162b2 on other cell types and tissues both in vitro and in vivo.

A panel of doctors and scientists, including Dr. Peter McCollough, discussed the study’s shocking findings.

Watch via Rumble:

Watch Emerald Robinson's full interview with Dr. Robert Malone for his latest comments:

Here's more from Malone:

Dr. Robert Malone, Joe Rogan and Dr. Zelenko!

If you missed Dr. Robert Malone on Joe Rogan's podcast, allow me to bring you up to speed.

Because it was FANTASTIC!

No offense to Joe Rogan, but who would have expected in 2022 an MMA, actor and comedian would be doing CIRCLES around the so-called Mainstream Media and showing them what REAL journalism looks like.

It's incredible.

Joe Rogan conducts a better interview than anyone on any of the MSM channels, and it's not even close.

This is what real news looks like!

This is what real questions look like...

This is what an unfiltered and unscripted interview looks like.

You can be forgiven for not recognizing it because other than Rogan there is almost no one doing this anymore.

Give Dr. Malone a follow on Gettr:

https://twitter.com/GETTRofficial/status/1477042345820442627

Now let's explore some clips:

https://twitter.com/Drrobertmalonee/status/1477154146851643398

True:

This one is a must-see:

https://twitter.com/BTurati/status/1477153312109903873

More:

https://twitter.com/BTurati/status/1477153312109903873

Exactly right:

Thank you Dr. Malone!

https://twitter.com/QuestCovidTruth/status/1477284154131714049

This part needs extra attention:

Now watch as he explains how the government killed HCQ and ivermectin:

PCR testing fraud:

Are you awake yet?

Truth:

Dr. Malone even took time to praise Dr. Zelenko and his ZStack Zelenko Protocol.

Watch here on Rumble:

The ZStack is finally back in stock.

You can check availability here and save 5% with promo code WLT2022.

Who loves ya baby?

GET THE TRUTH: DailyTruthReport.com

Now here's an idea....

How about we take this guy who tells the truth and replace Dr. Fraudci?

Would you support that?

Add your vote here:

NATIONAL POLL: Do You Support Dr. Malone Replacing Fauci?


, ,

 

Join the conversation!

Please share your thoughts about this article below. We value your opinions, and would love to see you add to the discussion!

log in

Forgot password?

reset password

Back to
log in

Hey, Noah here!

Wondering where we went?

Read this and bookmark our new site!

See you over there!

Read Here
Thanks for sharing!
Thanks for sharing!
We invite you to become a WeLoveTrump insider. Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.