2,000 Mules ‘Fact Checkers’ Get Fact Checked

The left-wing doublespeak is unreal with this one…

If we are talking about using cell phone data to track abortion—in that case, the efficacy of the geolocation data is all too accurate, so accurate, that it poses an Orwellian-style threat to the freedom of women everywhere.

However, when ‘fact-checkers’ are discussing using cell phone geolocation to gain insight into election fraud, according to them, the data is too ‘inaccurate’ to draw any conclusions—the tech simply isn’t that precise.

2,000 Mules has been attacked by mainstream media propaganda pushers claiming that the methods used to pin down ballot trafficking are unreliable at best.

In what appears to be a coordinated attack, the Associated Press, PolitiFact, and Reuters all claim that tracking cell phone data can only provide extremely rough estimates of where a particular subject is…

These assertions contradict claims made by mainstream outlets in the past which claim that tracking cell phone data is an excellent means of understanding and gaining insight into criminal activity.

Let’s examine their claims and the pushback:

A documentary by Dinesh D’Souza claims it can prove widespread fraud was carried out during the 2020 US presidential election. @ReutersFacts examined the main claims and did not find any concrete evidence definitively showing proof of fraud. https://t.co/ChpCwyejpi

— Cambridge Skeptics (@cambskeptics) May 29, 2022

2000 mules says it all. For the libflakes who say geo location is not accurate , the earth is round too. Fact check that.

— Alva Nordstrom (@Fordshomaga) May 23, 2022

The left-wing ‘fact-checkers’ at Politifact claim:

Mayer, the University of Wisconsin-Madison political scientist, said it’s not credible to rely on the cell phone data to conclude that these 400,000 ballots were illegal.

Such geospatial data is not precise enough to prove without uncertainty that a person submitted a ballot to a drop box, only that they came within a short distance of it, the Associated Press reported.

 

I continue my takedown of the bogus "fact checks" on "2000 Mules", revealing their shallowness, stupidity and naked bias. pic.twitter.com/uJQ7FwIAn5

— Dinesh D'Souza (@DineshDSouza) May 25, 2022

The mainstream establishment media are sweating bullets and are trying to convince people that the material in the movie is false. https://t.co/ifPlHlUcZU

— David J Harris Jr (@DavidJHarrisJr) May 26, 2022

Our friends over at the Red State Observer fired back:

That’s simply not true. In the first sentence of the quote, the writer says that experts say that a smartphone can be reliably tracked within a few meters.

Depending on what “a few” means in this case, that could be six or nine feet. That’s hardly leaving a healthy amount of uncertainty. Also, we’re not just talking about one visit to a ballot box.

Pieces in the Washington Post and the New York Times also characterize cellphone location data as quite specific and reliable.