Court Rules Pennsylvania Senate’s Audit of 2020 Election Results in the State Will Move Forward

It’s official:

The Pennsylvania Senate will move forward with its investigation of the 2020 presidential election results.

The media wants to cover this up.

They call President Trump’s claims “the big lie.”

But if that’s the case, why are multiple states moving forward with massive audits and investigations?

Why have audits (such as the one in Maricopa) exposed tens of thousands of irregularities, including duplicate ballots?

We expect the media to ignore this Pennsylvania bombshell.

.@JakeCorman on election integrity in PA:

“Today’s ruling upholds the General Assembly’s clear legal and constitutional authority to provide oversight of our election system"https://t.co/6vFp4pf1WN

— Steve Cortes (@CortesSteve) January 12, 2022

The truth will always come out.https://t.co/JNSs3pVl5H

— Dee 💯 🇺🇸 ☠️ (@Derameth) January 12, 2022

NEW: Court Rules Pennsylvania Senate’s Investigation of the 2020 Election Results in the State Will Move Forward (GatewayPundit)

— HeadlineHunter!🚨U.S. (@HHunter_US) January 12, 2022

A Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court has denied a request by legislative Democrats and Attorney General @JoshShapiroPA to block the release of voters’ information to the Senate Intergovernmental Operations Committee investigating the 2020 general electionhttps://t.co/NjBzrNUyfH

— Real America's Voice (RAV) (@RealAmVoice) January 12, 2022

If Democrats have nothing to hide, then why were they trying to block this audit?

You see, Democrats filed a lawsuit to try to stop this investigation from taking place.

But a court has ruled that the Senate can move forward to investigate.

Per Just the News:

A Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court has denied a request by legislative Democrats and Attorney General Josh Shapiro to block the release of voters’ information to the Senate Intergovernmental Operations Committee investigating the 2020 general election and 2021 primary.

The Senate committee subpoenaed the Pennsylvania Department of State in September for the personal information of about 9 million Pennsylvania voters as part of a review of the 2020 general and 2021 primary elections, led by Iowa-based firm Envoy Sage.

The Department of State, which oversees elections, partially complied with the subpoena but refused to provide voters’ driver’s license numbers and partial Social Security numbers the Senate committee contends is necessary to confirm voters’ identities.

In oral arguments last month, attorneys for Senate Republicans pointed to the Department of State sharing the same information with the League of Women Voters in 2012 and past auditor general reviews. Challengers argued the move could put voters’ information at risk of fraud or identity theft.

Shapiro and legislative Democrats also argued Envoy Sage has not outlined sufficient security measures to protect the information and cited the company’s lack of election auditing experience. In addition, Democrats argued the state is bound by federal law to protect “critical infrastructure information” on the state’s election systems.

A panel of five judges ruled Monday the Department of State did not provide “a clear legal right to quash the subpoena on the theory that it furthers no legitimate legislative purpose.”

The judges also found, however, “there is a substantial factual question surrounding the federal protection requirements and the capability of the Senate Committee’s contracted vendor, Envoy Sage, LLC, to protect the infrastructure information.”

It appears that Pennsylvania will NOT use Cyber Ninjas, which was part of the Maricopa audit.

If another state with another firm shows the same results (thousands of discrepancies), then more people will continue to doubt the outcome of the 2020 election.

Look at this Democrat Senator freaking out.

The Insurrection continues: Pennsylvania Senate committee to hold hearings on its audit of the 2020, 2021 elections https://t.co/nPPZjZSZbb

— Senator Hughes (@SenatorHughes) January 7, 2022

They know what’s coming!

Why are they so against transparency?

If there’s nothing wrong, then why block the investigation of the ballots?

Local WFMZ News confirms:

A Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court has denied a request by legislative Democrats and Attorney General Josh Shapiro to block the release of voters’ information to the Senate Intergovernmental Operations Committee investigating the 2020 general election and 2021 primary.

The Senate committee subpoenaed the Pennsylvania Department of State in September for the personal information of about 9 million Pennsylvania voters as part of a review of the 2020 general and 2021 primary elections, led by Iowa-based firm Envoy Sage.

The Department of State, which oversees elections, partially complied with the subpoena but refused to provide voters’ driver’s license numbers and partial Social Security numbers the Senate committee contends is necessary to confirm voters’ identities.

[…]

Senate President Pro Tempore Jake Corman, R-Bellefonte, commended the court for upholding the Senate committee’s authority to issue a subpoena for the voter information.

“Today’s ruling upholds the General Assembly’s clear legal and constitutional authority to provide oversight of our election system,” Corman said. “… The Senate Intergovernmental Operations Committee is conducting this review in a way that is transparent, fair and legally sound, and I am thankful this ruling completely validates our thoughtful approach to this deeply contentious issue.

“We have always intended to take every step necessary to protect the personal information of voters. Our resolve to protect this data has never wavered, and we look forward to proving beyond a shadow of a doubt that we can safeguard this information effectively.”

Try An "Extreme Altitude Wine" ... From Patriot Wines

Shapiro, meanwhile, is touting the court’s reluctance to immediately release the voter information, and vowed to continue to fight against its release.

If Joe Biden truly won fair and square, then this investigation should prove it.

But instead, Democrat leaders are obstructing transparency.

Why?

What are they trying to cover up?

What don’t they want the public to know?