Skip to main content
We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here.

UK Group That Includes Former Pfizer VP Dr. Michael Yeadon Files Complaint in International Court For Crimes Against Humanity Against Gates, Fauci, Schwab, Daszak & Others


16,305 views

A group of UK activists has filed a complaint with the International Criminal Court (ICC) on behalf of UK citizens against high-profile names for crimes against humanity.

The group, which includes an astrophysicist and a funeral director, listed Big Pharma executives, UK officials, and figureheads of globalist organizations.

The complaint lists UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson, Bill and Melinda Gates, and World Economic Forum Founder Klaus Schwab.

LifeSiteNews shared additional names:

The UK group, including an astrophysicist and a funeral director, additionally charged Dr. Anthony Fauci; Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, director-general of the World Health Organization (WHO);  June Raine, chief executive of Medicines and Healthcare products regulatory agency (MHRA); Dr. Radiv Shah, president of the Rockefeller Foundation; and Dr. Peter Daszak, president of EcoHealth Alliance,  as “responsible for numerous violations of the Nuremberg Code … war crimes and crimes of aggression” in the UK and other countries.

After repeated unsuccessful attempts to raise a case with the English Court system, the applicants resorted to calling with “the utmost urgency” for the ICC “to stop the rollout of COVID vaccinations, introduction of unlawful vaccination passports and all other types of illegal warfare … being waged against the people of the UK.”

The 46-page legal filing submitted on December 6th accused the defendants of numerous violations of the Nuremberg Code and war crimes as defined by the Rome Statutes, Articles 6, 7, 8, 15, 21, and 53.

Below is a complete list of those accused for crimes against humanity:

  • Bill & Melinda Gates, Founders of Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
  • Anthony Fauci, Director of U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
  • Peter Daszak, President of EcoHealth Alliance
  • Albert Bourla, CEO of Pfizer
  • Stephane Bancel, CEO of AstraZeneca
  • Pascal Soriot, CEO of Moderna
  • Alex Gorsky, CEO of Johnson and Johnson
  • Tedros Adhanhom Ghebreyesus, Director-General of the WHO
  • Boris Johnson, UK Prime Minister
  • Christopher Whitty, UK Chief Medical Adviser
  • Matthew Hancock, former UK Secretary of State for Health and Social Care
  • Sajid Javid, current UK Secretary of State for Health and Social Care
  • June Raine, UK Chief Executive of Medicines and Healthcare products
  • Dr. Ravid Shah, President of the Rockefeller Foundation
  • Klaus Schwab, President of the World Economic Forum

The Desert Review added:

Attorney Hannah Rose and seven applicants brought the Nuremberg action on behalf of the victims, the entire population of the United Kingdom. She filed the legal proceeding with the International Criminal Court located at The Hague. The Hague is notable for its long history in helping victims seek redress for war crimes and defining appropriate ethical guidelines for conduct during war.

Following the Nazi atrocities committed during World War II, the war crime trials were held in Nuremberg, Germany. Following these, a set of principles was developed, which ultimately led to the development of the Nuremberg Code.

These principles essentially meant that anyone, no matter how wealthy or powerful, even a head of state, was not above the law. The fact that the law of their home nation would permit their action would not relieve the person from justice under international law.

In particular, the medical experiments conducted by the Nazi doctors led to strict rules and ethical principles regarding future human scientific trials, including the doctrine of necessary informed consent and freedom from coercion or threat in submitting to experimental drugs.

As we all know, before receiving a surgical procedure, there is a legal and ethical requirement that the patient be apprised of any significant potential risks, including infection, bleeding, nerve damage, or even death. The patient usually signs the consent form following this explanation. And as we all know, whenever we receive prescription medication, we are notified of the potential risks on a package insert and usually a discussion with the Pharmacist.

The vaccines should be no different, yet they are. A person about to receive the jab is rarely told that there are risks of blood clots, bleeding, cerebral thrombosis, myocarditis, and death, yet those risks exist.
As mentioned by The Rio Times, the group argued that suppression of effective treatments, such as hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, resulted in significantly more COVID-19 deaths.

They argue that the blockades were enacted under the guise of artificially inflated infection and death numbers from a modified virus, as well as the experimental “vaccines” that have resulted:

  • Massive short-term harm and death, with at least 395,049 reported adverse reactions to COVID “vaccines” in the U.K. alone;
  • a sharp increase in ChildLine calls from vulnerable children during lockdowns;
  • “Wealth and business destruction” through imposed lockdowns.”
  • “Severe deprivation of physical liberty in violation of fundamental rules of international law,” including travel and assembly bans, and forced quarantine and self-isolation;
  • apartheid due to segregation by possession or vaccination passport;
  • and “expected reduction infertility” following “vaccination,” among other harmful physical and psychological effects.

In addition, the petitioners contend that “the suppression of safe and effective alternative treatments for Covid-19 amounts to murder and warrants a full investigation by the court.”

They noted that in addition to censorship of online information and promotion of these alternative treatments, “some academic journals are blocking publication of studies demonstrating the effectiveness of drugs such as ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine.”

The petitioners also cited quotes from Holocaust survivors who have drawn “strong parallels between Covid’s restrictions and the beginning of the Holocaust.”

In an open letter, the Holocaust survivors have called on medical regulatory authorities to “stop this unholy medical experiment on humanity immediately,” which they contend violates the Nuremberg Code.

Download the 46-page criminal complaint here

Below are the applicants who filed the complaint on behalf of UK citizens:

  • Hannah Rose – Lawyer and human rights activist
  • Dr. Mike Yeadon – Qualified life science researcher with a degree in biochemistry in toxicology, and a research-based PhD in respiratory pharmacology, former Vice President and Chief Scientist ofallergy and respiratory research at Pfizer
  • Piers Corbyn – Astrophysicist and activist
  • Mark Sexton – Retired Police officer
  • John O’ Loony – Funeral Director and activist
  • Johnny McStay – Activist
  • Louise Shotbolt – Nurse and human rights activist


 

Join the conversation!

Please share your thoughts about this article below. We value your opinions, and would love to see you add to the discussion!

Hey, Noah here!

Wondering where we went?

Read this and bookmark our new site!

See you over there!

Thanks for sharing!