It’s not a secret that pharmaceutical companies have zero liability for vaccine injuries in the United States.
You can’t sue the manufacturers for damages caused by vaccine injuries.
Confirmed: You Can’t Sue Pfizer or Moderna for Severe Covid Vaccine Side Effects https://t.co/e60HeMykR2
— Kyle Becker (@kylenabecker) November 7, 2021
Just in case your forgot…or never knew – you have little to no recourse if you have vaccine side effects. #WhatILearnedToday https://t.co/yDnyDG9dp7
— Brad Staggs – Conspiracy Observer (@realBradStaggs) November 9, 2021
The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 (NCVIA) prevents you from taking Big Pharma manufacturers to court over adverse reactions.
As the CDC indicates, vaccine manufacturers faced several lawsuits over claims of vaccine injuries.
Due to the litigation and reduction of profits, manufacturers threatened to stop making vaccines.
That’s where the NCVIA provided a lifeline to Big Pharma and made vaccine development a lucrative business for massive profits.
From the CDC:
During the mid-1970s, there was an increased focus on personal health and more people became concerned about vaccine safety. Several lawsuits were filed against vaccine manufacturers and healthcare providers by people who believed they had been injured by the diphtheria, pertussis, tetanus (DPT) vaccine. [4] Damages were awarded despite the lack of scientific evidence to support vaccine injury claims. [4] As a result of these decisions, liability and prices soared, and several vaccine manufacturers halted production. A vaccine shortage resulted and public health officials became concerned about the return of epidemic disease. To reduce liability and respond to public health concerns, Congress passed the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA) in 1986. This act was influential in many ways.
While the federal government has a vaccine injury compensation program, it’s filled with red tape and extremely difficult to navigate.
However, private employer mandates may have opened another avenue to sue for damages.
For businesses that mandated their employees to take the experimental COVID-19 jabs, they could face a litany of lawsuits from vaccine-injured victims.
A flight attendant for a major U.S. airline plans to sue the company for adverse effects that caused hospitalization and ongoing health issues.
Lisa Williams, a single mom from Tampa, Florida, is part of a 2,000-member coalition of airline workers filing a lawsuit against their airline.
In a press conference, Williams cited unreasonable accommodations of indefinite unpaid leave if refusing the experimental injection.
Williams stated, “We are not anti-vaccine. We are anti-mandate,” Williams said. “My employer has done everything possible to prevent folks like me from exercising our Title 7 rights to protect our faith and our medical autonomy on the American with Disabilities Act.”
She explained how she took the Johnson & Johnson COVID-19 jab under duress from the coercion of losing her job.
Williams suffered adverse reactions from the injection and nearly died from her injuries.
Watch her presser below:
Breaking🚨Coerced flight attendant who took forced injection under duress suing airline after being hospitalized with adverse effects and ongoing pain/health issues post-jab. pic.twitter.com/cnkJBtYNAp
— Erin Elizabeth Health Nut News 🙌 (@unhealthytruth) November 9, 2021
A flight attendant is suing “a major airline” over its vaccine mandate after she experienced severe adverse reactions from the jab.https://t.co/iNLxUaaFw5
— Jamie White (@WhiteIsTheFury) November 9, 2021
Flight Attendant Lisa Williams FL, representing 2000 colleagues suing their Airline companyhttps://t.co/iSI3NjYk4A
— Ωman🇨🇦 (@omegaman19711) November 9, 2021
VAX ADVERSE REACTIONS ARE REAL: Coerced flight attendant who took forced injection under duress suing airline after being hospitalized with adverse effects, ongoing pain and health issues post-jab.#TerminateTheMandate#FreedomNotForce #NoJabsForJobs pic.twitter.com/ddLFzOGccp
— John Cremeans USA (@JohnCremeansUSA) November 9, 2021
This lawsuit comes on the heels of a U.S. Federal Appeals Court suspending Biden’s COVID-19 jab mandate on businesses with 100+ employees.
The court cited “grave statutory and constitutional issues.”
Despite the court’s ruling, the Biden Administration told businesses to continue enforcing the illegal mandate.Â
While Williams didn’t name the specific airline, Florida Politics stated she’s a Tampa-based United Airlines flight attendant:
Lisa Williams, a Tampa-based flight attendant for United Airlines with 31 years of experience, is part of a group of more than 2,000 employees, called “Airline Employees for Health Freedom,” suing the airline for forcing them to get the shot or face unpaid leave. DeSantis has the group’s full support, she relayed.
“We are not anti-vaccine. We are anti-mandate,” Williams said.
Williams said she “caved” and got the Johnson & Johnson vaccine after missing the deadline to declare a faith-based exemption to the airline’s rule. However, she said she was rushed to the hospital because of her adverse reaction and nearly lost her life.
Williams’ side effects still linger and she suffers from chronic pain. However, the airline won’t give her compensation for its role in getting the shot.
It’s obvious Williams was coerced into taking an experimental injection to keep her job.
According to the Nuremberg Code, voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential:
This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved, as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that, before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject, there
should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person, which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.
Like many others across the globe, Williams was coerced into taking this injection.
Who will be held responsible for these violations?
Join the conversation!
Please share your thoughts about this article below. We value your opinions, and would love to see you add to the discussion!