Skip to main content may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on the site. Read our full Disclosure here.

Could There Be Collusion Between Dr.Fauci And CCP Dr.Zhong?

An interview surfaced last year, which is now receiving more attention. In the interview both support long lock downs, and mass vaccinations.


Could there be possible collusion between these two?

Maybe. Each seems to be in favor of long lockdowns, and there are a lot of people who say that Fauci & Zhong are in some sort of collusion.

Do I think this is the case?

I don’t know. What I do know is that the two are awfully friendly for health experts from adversarial countries.

They also seem to be really focused on social, and economic considerations here.

Why are health experts focused on this? Shouldn’t they be more focused on the health aspects?

What about preventative health?

Covid-19 does not seem to affect athletes the same way, so why aren’t proper diet and exercise being championed here?

Proper diet and exercise seem to prevent a lot of negative health consequences, so why aren’t these “Public health experts” talking about that more?

They are scientists right?

Why aren’t they talking about DNA, RNA, The vaccine process, etc?

Why aren’t they discussing science more, and social/economic policy less?

Stop Big Tech From Tracking You Online: PureVPN

Watch the video below, and take a look through these reports, and decide for yourselves what you think may be going on.

Take a look:

Just The News had more on the story: 

Zhong has a long career in the Chinese Communist Party hierarchy, having served for years in delegatory positions in both the CCP's National Congress and its National People's Congress. He has also served on numerous state research initiatives and is the founder of the state-funded Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Diseases.

On the panel, Fauci and Zhong both expressed hopes that COVID-19 restrictions worldwide would continue well into the future.

Zhong himself claimed that efforts to develop natural immunity to COVID-19 are inadvisable from a national policy standpoint. "It doesn't work this way," he said. "And it's not realistic, and less scientific, and ... inhumane."

Zhong argued that "mass vaccinations" are the "commonsense" approach to engendering herd immunity in the population, but "to do that … will take about two or three years time with global collaboration."

NPR had an earlier report on Dr.Zhong: 

Dr. Zhong also draws comparisons to Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and a prominent adviser to the federal government on its COVID-19 containment efforts. Like Fauci, Zhong, who is a former track and field star, is a fitness buff – and is is widely seen as a reliable source of information in contrast to the some government figures.

"There's a parallel in both countries in that manner," said Dr. Jeffrey Koplan, a vice president of global health at Emory University, who worked alongside Zhong in the aftermath of the 2003 SARS epidemic. "In many instances, politics can play a role that's helpful by mobilizing resources and helping the public health effort in a very positive way. But it also can be a hindrance."

On January 20, it was Zhong who confirmed in a state television interview that the new coronavirus could spread from person to person, warning the public that the virus may be highly contagious.


Join the conversation!

Please share your thoughts about this article below. We value your opinions, and would love to see you add to the discussion!

We Love Trump
Thanks for sharing!
Send this to a friend