Skip to main content
We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here.

WATCH: Joe Biden: “What Am I Doing Here?”

In another public display, 78 year old Joe Biden shows further signs of cognitive decline. This comes after dozens of Democrats expressed concern over nuclear codes.


18,616 views

I cannot even be angry at Joe Biden……

Look at his face in the video.

What they did to this man was cruel. The Democratic Party ran a candidate who was in clear cognitive decline. He looks like he is struggling so much in the video.

There are a lot of times where I myself have poked fun at him, but the more time goes on, the less I can actually find it in myself to do that.

This is even more important in light of three dozen Democrats expressing concern over him having the nuclear codes…..

Take a look:  

Newsmax reported on the Biden visit to Texas: 

President Joe Biden traveled to Texas Friday as the state works to recover from a severe winter storm that caused serious damage to homes and businesses, left millions without power or clean water for days, and killed at least two dozen.

Biden and his wife, first lady Jill Biden, landed in Houston where he met Republican Governor Greg Abbott and Houston Mayor Sylvester Turner to discuss the recovery from last week’s storm.

Biden was scheduled to meet with volunteers at a Houston food bank and tour a health center where COVID-19 vaccines are being distributed.

Deputy National Security Adviser Elizabeth Sherwood-Randall told reporters on Air Force One during the trip that Texas's lack of energy regulation had hurt it during the storm.

Politico had this to report on the nuclear codes: 

Nearly three dozen House Democrats on Monday called on Biden to relinquish his sole authority to launch nuclear weapons, in the latest appeal to reform the command-and-control structure so that no single person can initiate a nuclear war.

“...Vesting one person with this authority entails real risks,” states the letter spearheaded by Rep. Jimmy Panetta of California. “Past presidents have threatened to attack other countries with nuclear weapons or exhibited behavior that caused other officials to express concern about the president’s judgment.“

“While any president would presumably consult with advisors before ordering a nuclear attack, there is no requirement to do so,” the letter adds. “The military is obligated to carry out the order if they assess it is legal under the laws of war. Under the current posture of U.S. nuclear forces, that attack would happen in minutes.”

They offer a number of alternatives, including requiring other officials in the line of succession, such as the vice president and the speaker of the House — “neither of whom can be removed by the president if they disagree — to concur with a launch order.”



 

Join the conversation!

Please share your thoughts about this article below. We value your opinions, and would love to see you add to the discussion!

Hey, Noah here!

Wondering where we went?

Read this and bookmark our new site!

See you over there!

Thanks for sharing!