Skip to main content may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on the site. Read our full Disclosure here.

The Supreme Court May Finally Hear Election Cases

Reports are abuzz with claims that The United States Supreme Court may actually be considering taking on 2020 election cases.


Too little too late?

I understand why people are going to be angry about this, but just hold your horses for one second.
This is an opportunity.

With recent reports surfacing from Time Magazine alleging massive collusion to undermine the 2020 Presidential election, and the massive piles of evidence the courts would NOT review……

We may finally have a solid case.

Trending: The Ghislaine Maxwell Trial Begins Tomorrow, But The Judge May Be Compromised

Could this be the way Biden is removed from office?

Take a look:  

Trending Politics reported on the story: 

It is too little and too late but the Supreme Court is finally weighing in on high-profile election cases it will consider at its February conference.

The potential cases include challenges to the 2020 presidential election from controversial attorneys Lin Wood and Sidney Powell, both of whom have been banned from Twitter, along with Republican Rep. Mike Kelly’s Pennsylvania lawsuit, the Washington Examiner reported.The Supreme Court on Friday listed several high-profile election lawsuits for consideration at its mid-February conference.

The cases include challenges to the 2020 election from Trump-aligned lawyers Lin Wood and Sidney Powell, as well as Republican Rep. Mike Kelly’s Pennsylvania lawsuit. Nearly every lawsuit takes issue with the expanded use of mail-in ballots by many states.

The Washington Examiner came through with more details: 

In nearly every plea for expedition, lawyers backing former President Donald Trump told the court that if the cases were not heard before President Biden's inauguration, their success would be unlikely.

But after the court pushed them off, many lawyers said that the challenges were still important and could have long-term implications for election fairness. Trump lawyer John Eastman told the Washington Examiner that even with Trump out of office, it was important to settle the issues raised by expanded mail-in voting.

"Our legal issue," he said, referring to the way in which Pennsylvania conducted the 2020 election, "remains important and in need of the court’s review."


Join the conversation!

Please share your thoughts about this article below. We value your opinions, and would love to see you add to the discussion!

We Love Trump
Thanks for sharing!
Send this to a friend