Skip to main content may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on the site. Read our full Disclosure here.

South Dakota Fights Back Against Biden

Sources reveal legislation in South Dakota which aims to review and annul executive orders made by Biden that are deemed unconstitutional.


Premier Biden is at it again…..

One man should not be able to just erase years of hard work, jobs, and whole industries with the flick of a pen, but reports seem to indicate that this is Joe Biden’s M.O.  

According to reports, South Dakota is sick of it, and new legislation is being proposed to counter the threat of a guy who just cannot stop signing executive order after executive order.

I have said it time and time again: one guy in D.C. has no idea what is good for Alaska, Ohio, California, Nevada, and South Dakota, how could he?

Trending: Monique Morley Claims She Suffered A heart Attack Following Pfizer Jab

Besides, even the MSM is now reporting that this guy won because of a rigged election, so his orders really can’t count for anything.

Here are the latest reports:  

The Daily Wire had more on the story: 

State Rep. Aaron Aylward (R-Harrisburg) introduced HB 1194, which is described as an act “to authorize the review of certain executive orders issued by the President of the United States.”

The process to potentially nullify an executive order, which by nature bypasses congressional approval, “begins with a review by the Executive Council of the Legislative Research Board, followed by a referral from the Council to the attorney general and the governor,” South Dakota news station KELO-TV reported last week. “Once the referral has been made, the attorney general may examine the order to determine whether the state can seek an exemption or declare it unconstitutional.”

The bill specifies that Attorney General Jason Ravnsborg could exempt South Dakota from any law or order “that restricts a person’s rights or that is determined … to be unconstitutional”

Kelo reported: 

The bill takes a broad view, stating that no executive order may be implemented “that restricts a person’s rights.”

The proposed bill would also allow the attorney general to block implementation of any order deemed unconstitutional if the order refers to:

A pandemic or other public health emergency


The regulation of natural resources

The regulation of the agricultural industry

The regulation of land use

The regulation of the financial sector through the imposition of environmental, social, or governance standards

The regulation of the constitutional right to keep and bear arms

We reached out to Aylward to ask him why he is proposing this bill, and though he declined to give an on screen interview due to time constraints, he did agree to answer written questions.


Join the conversation!

Please share your thoughts about this article below. We value your opinions, and would love to see you add to the discussion!

We Love Trump
Thanks for sharing!
Send this to a friend