Skip to main content
BoomMag: Readers and Fans

We Love Trump

We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here.

Did Ted Cruz Just Stab President Trump In The Back At The Last Minute?

49.2k views
49,126 views

Do you trust Ted Cruz?

How about Lindsey Graham?

I really want to trust them both, but you know who they remind me of?

Trey Gowdy.

Trending: Adrenachrome “Black Eye Club” Finally Exposed In Detail…

Actually MOST Republican politicians all remind me of the same person….all bark, no bite.

They talk a bit game, especially when the cameras are on.

They hoot and holler and Tweet.

But when it comes to really getting anything done?

It always crumbles.

And sometimes when they have sat on an opportunity, they block others from making real change.

Is that’s what’s happening here with Ted Cruz and this “election challenge”?

I’m afraid it may be.

Initially, the news that Cruz was finally involved and leading the charge looked great:

https://twitter.com/SebGorka/status/1345445137514684417

Still noticeably absent are Marco Rubio and Rand Paul.

Interestingly Fox News reports that the group led by Ted Cruz is a SEPARATE effort from what Sen. Josh Hawley is doing:

A group of GOP senators led by Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, will object to the Jan. 6 certification of the presidential election results next week unless there is an emergency 10-day audit of the results by an electoral commission.

Cruz and the other senators claim the Nov. 3 election “featured unprecedented allegations of voter fraud and illegal conduct.”

Joining Cruz are Sens. Ron Johnson, R-Wis.; James Lankford, R-Okla.; Steve Daines, R-Mont.; John Kennedy, R-La.; Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn., and Mike Braun, R-Ind.; as well as Sens.-elect Cynthia Lummis, R-Wyo.; Roger Marshall, R-Kansas; Bill Hagerty, R-Tenn., and Tommy Tuberville, R-Ala.

Their effort is separate from one announced by Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., who said this week that he will object to what he claims was the failure of some states — most notably Pennsylvania — to follow their own election laws.

“Voter fraud has posed a persistent challenge in our elections, although its breadth and scope are disputed,” the lawmakers said Saturday in a statement. “By any measure, the allegations of fraud and irregularities in the 2020 election exceed any in our lifetimes.”

No evidence of widespread voter fraud that could change the outcome of the election has been presented to date. Dozens of legal challenges filed by the Trump campaign and its supporters have been dismissed by judges across the country.

A source familiar with the effort by the GOP senators told Fox News that it was Cruz who orchestrated the push just days before the joint session of Congress on Wednesday to officially approve the Electoral College votes electing former Vice President Joe Biden.

The lawmakers say there is a precedent of Democrats objecting to election results in 1969, 2001, 2005 and 2019. “And, in both 1969 and 2005, a Democratic Senator joined with a Democratic House Member in forcing votes in both houses on whether to accept the presidential electors being challenged,” they said.

Cruz: I agreed to argue Pa. election case because US needs ‘resolution’Video
The senators and senators-elect are calling for Congress to appoint a commission to conduct a 10-day emergency audit of the election returns in states where the results are disputed. They cite as precedent the 1877 race between Samuel Tilden and Rutherford Hayes in which there were allegations of fraud in multiple states.

“In 1877, Congress did not ignore those allegations, nor did the media simply dismiss those raising them as radicals trying to undermine democracy,” the lawmakers said in the statement. “Instead, Congress appointed an Electoral Commission — consisting of five Senators, five House Members, and five Supreme Court Justices — to consider and resolve the disputed returns.”

“We should follow that precedent. To wit, Congress should immediately appoint an Electoral Commission, with full investigatory and fact-finding authority, to conduct an emergency 10-day audit of the election returns in the disputed states. Once completed, individual states would evaluate the Commission’s findings and could convene a special legislative session to certify a change in their vote, if needed.”

If that doesn’t happen, the senators intend to vote against certification.

“Accordingly, we intend to vote on January 6 to reject the electors from disputed states as not ‘regularly given’ and ‘lawfully certified’ (the statutory requisite), unless and until that emergency 10-day audit is completed,” they said in the statement.

It is unclear whether they will rally more Republicans to their cause, given Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell’s public acceptance of Biden’s victory. While the lawmakers note that most Democrats and some Republicans will vote to certify the results, they argue that an audit would increase the public’s faith in the process.

More:

But now Mo Brooks who is indeed a great ally to President Trump is questioning Cruz and his motives or at least his efficacy.

Take a look at this:

NATIONAL POLL: Do You Trust Fox News?

So what do you think?

Is Cruz a snake in the grass?

Untrustworthy till the end?

Still harboring a grudge over “Lyin’ Ted”?


 

Join the conversation!

Please share your thoughts about this article below. We value your opinions, and would love to see you add to the discussion!

log in

Forgot password?

reset password

Back to
log in

Hey, Noah here!

Wondering where we went?

Read this and bookmark our new site!

See you over there!

Read Here
Thanks for sharing!
Thanks for sharing!
We invite you to become a WeLoveTrump insider. Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.