The New York grand jury case can be summed up as communism on full display—that’s really what it is, not a legal proceeding.
According to the latest reports, text messages between Stormy Daniels, and President Trump’s lawyer, Joe Tacopina, could potentially remove Tacopina as President Trump’s legal counsel.
Citing New York law reports claim that because Tacopina allegedly discussed the Stormy Daniels case with members of his office, he may potentially have to come off the case. …
They’re really trying to pull out all the stops to indict President Trump. …
Even going so far as to remove his legal counsel—a play right out of Stalin’s playbook. …Here are the latest developments in the ongoing case:
BREAKING: Messages between Stormy Daniels and Donald Trump’s Attorney throw a new curveball into Trump’s $130,000 extramarital affair “hush money” case.
The fix is in.
The Democrats are doing everything in their power to pin this 100% on Trump. https://t.co/AqGBiEF8mO
— Proud Elephant 🇺🇸🦅 (@ProudElephantUS) March 22, 2023
They're trying to STRIP President Trump of his legal representation in the Stormy Daniels case—communism 101.
— WeLoveTrump (@WeLovePresTrump) March 22, 2023
CNN broke the story:
The exchanges – said to date back to 2018, when Daniels was seeking representation – raise the possibility that the Trump attorney, Joe Tacopina, could be sidelined from his defense of the former president in a case pertaining to Trump’s alleged role in a scheme to pay hush money to Daniels.
Daniels’ communications with Tacopina and others at his firm include details relating to Daniels’ situation, according to her current attorney Clark Brewster, who believes the communications show a disclosure of confidential information from Daniels.
President Trump is still in the dark regarding potential charges. …Will Alvin Bragg actually come to his senses and do the right thing?https://t.co/49gwWiwzV9
— WeLoveTrump (@WeLovePresTrump) March 22, 2023
— DailyNoah.com (@DailyNoahNews) March 22, 2023
Trending Politics explains:
Attorney complications are the latest sign that the president’s legal team is already facing a formidable challenge in defending him against DA Bragg’s attempts to show that President Trump directed his former attorney and fixer Michael Cohen to disguise the payment to Daniels as a business transaction.
Prosecutors would need to show that the payment amounted to a political campaign contribution to avoid damaging political headlines in the run-up to the 2016 election. The untested legal argument has spectators wondering how convincing the charges against President Trump will be should he face prosecution.
Join the conversation!
Please share your thoughts about this article below. We value your opinions, and would love to see you add to the discussion!