2016 Cures Act, Violation of Nuremberg Code?

This is a follow up to a prior post on stunning claims presented last week.

Let’s rewind:

An explosive report last week by Clayton Morris of Redacted revealed claims that the Department of Defense controlled the COVID-19 program from the very beginning.

“According to newly-obtained documents, the Pentagon used a combination of shady approval authorizations that are still in use, including the PREP Act, the emergency use authorization, and other transaction authority (the OTA), all of which shielded Big Pharma, agencies, medical participants that delivered unregulated vaccines from any liability and protected them,” Morris explained.

.

.

.

Watch the full video report from Clayton Morris of Redacted below:

Was COVID-19 ‘Pandemic’ a Department of Defense Operation Dating to Obama Era?

One act of legislation mentioned in the Redacted report was the 'Cures Act' and how it eliminated informed consent for participants in clinical trials.

No informed consent?

That sounds like a violation of the Nuremberg Code.

From the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum:

1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.

This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.

The person should give consent and exercise free power of choice without force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion.

If we review the 'Cures Act,' there is one shocking section that eliminates informed consent.

From H.R.34 - 21st Century Cures Act:

(Sec. 3024) Clinical testing of investigational medical devices and drugs no longer requires the informed consent of the subjects if the testing poses no more than minimal risk to the subjects and includes safeguards.

Some other peculiar sections buried in the legislation:

(Sec. 3084) BARDA may enter an agreement with an independent, nongovernmental nonprofit to foster and accelerate the development and innovation of medical countermeasures and related technologies. BARDA must direct and oversee the nonprofit's work and ensure transparency and accountability.

(Sec. 3085) BARDA's procurement of medical countermeasures no longer requires Presidential approval or an agreement between HHS and the Department of Homeland Security.

From Wikipedia:

The Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA) is a U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) office responsible for the procurement and development of medical countermeasures, principally against bioterrorism, including chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear (CBRN) threats, as well as pandemic influenza and emerging diseases.^[1]: 140 BARDA was established in 2006 through the Pandemic and All-Hazards Preparedness Act (PAHPA) and reports to the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response (ASPR). The office manages Project BioShield, which funds the research, development and stockpiling of vaccines and treatments that the government could use during public health emergencies such as chemical, biological, radiological or nuclear (CBRN) attacks.

The FDA stated about the 'Cures Act':

The 21st Century Cures Act (Cures Act), signed into law on December 13, 2016, is designed to help accelerate medical product development and bring new innovations and advances to patients who need them faster and more efficiently.

The law builds on FDA's ongoing work to incorporate the perspectives of patients into the development of drugs, biological products, and devices in FDA's decision-making process. Cures enhances our ability to modernize clinical trial designs, including the use of real-world evidence, and clinical outcome assessments, which will speed the development and review of novel medical products, including medical countermeasures.

So, the 'Cures Act':

• Eliminates informed consent in clinical testing of "investigational medical devices and drugs"
• Fast tracks the development of novel medical products, including medical countermeasures.

With the 'Cures Act' and other shady approval authorizations, the Nuremberg Code has been tossed in the fire.

The entire COVID-19 operation shattered the Nuremberg Code, including this 2016 bill that preceded the first diagnosed case of the pathogen.