JUST IN: The Twitter Files Part 7

It’s all coming out and the house of cards is finally starting to crumble…

The FBI deliberately set out to discredit the Hunter Biden laptop story before the story even became public knowledge—they did this through a targeted and concerted effort.

This isn’t new to readers at WeLoveTrump but perhaps it will come as a shock to the triple-masked and quadruple-vaxxed individuals running around in society…

Nearly 20% of Biden voters say that they wouldn’t have voted for him if they knew of the Hunter Biden laptop—the conclusion is clear—the FBI directly interfered in and successfully altered the results of the 2020 Presidential election.

Intelligence and government agencies pose the greatest threat to America, domestically and internationally—the quicker we dismantle these agencies, the quicker we can restore confidence in our ‘democracy’.

Michael Shellenberger revealed the shocking files in this thread, enjoy:

1. TWITTER FILES: PART 7

The FBI & the Hunter Biden Laptop

How the FBI & intelligence community discredited factual information about Hunter Biden’s foreign business dealings both after and *before* The New York Post revealed the contents of his laptop on October 14, 2020

— Michael Shellenberger (@shellenberger) December 19, 2022

The story begins in December 2019 when a Delaware computer store owner named John Paul (J.P.) Mac Isaac contacts the FBI about a laptop that Hunter Biden had left with him

On Dec 9, 2019, the FBI issues a subpoena for, and takes, Hunter Biden's laptop. https://t.co/TdaYhHMVRH pic.twitter.com/JxdkrkgAkI

— Michael Shellenberger (@shellenberger) December 19, 2022

Shortly before 7 pm ET on October 13, Hunter Biden’s lawyer, George Mesires, emails JP Mac Isaac.

Hunter and Mesires had just learned from the New York Post that its story about the laptop would be published the next day. pic.twitter.com/59RV5h8ZsM

— Michael Shellenberger (@shellenberger) December 19, 2022

8. The next day, October 14, 2020, The New York Post runs its explosive story revealing the business dealings of President Joe Biden’s son, Hunter. Every single fact in it was accurate. pic.twitter.com/TC2AnLNJAw

— Michael Shellenberger (@shellenberger) December 19, 2022

10. On Dec 2, @mtaibbi described the debate inside Twitter over its decision to censor a wholly accurate article.

Since then, we have discovered new info that points to an organized effort by the intel community to influence Twitter & other platforms https://t.co/1ZF3oottKR

— Michael Shellenberger (@shellenberger) December 19, 2022

Fox News previously reported:

It was later revealed that the first batch of “Twitter Files” were vetted without Musk’s knowledge by Twitter deputy general counsel Jim Baker, who previously served as the FBI’s general counsel and was involved in the Russia probe. Musk fired Baker shortly thereafter.

Baker was swept up Taibbi’s reporting about the suppression of the Hunter Biden story, telling his colleagues at the time, “I support the conclusion that we need more facts to assess whether the materials were hacked” but added, “it’s reasonable for us to assume that they may have been and that caution is warranted.”

 

12. And yet, during all of 2020, the FBI and other law enforcement agencies repeatedly primed Yoel Roth to dismiss reports of Hunter Biden’s laptop as a Russian “hack and leak” operation.

This is from a sworn declaration by Roth given in December 2020.https://t.co/IvTjyYw9iR pic.twitter.com/5iq2ATB3bW

— Michael Shellenberger (@shellenberger) December 19, 2022

14. Were the FBI warnings of a Russian hack-and-leak operation relating to Hunter Biden based on *any* new intel?

No, they weren't

“Through our investigations, we did not see any similar competing intrusions to what had happened in 2016,” admitted FBI agent Elvis Chan in Nov. pic.twitter.com/tFPMqbydbA

— Michael Shellenberger (@shellenberger) December 19, 2022

16. In fact, Twitter debunked false claims by journalists of foreign influence on its platform

"We haven’t seen any evidence to support that claim” by @oneunderscore__ @NBC News of foreign-controlled bots.

“Our review thus far shows a small-scale domestic troll effort…” pic.twitter.com/fWYNv7mMea

— Michael Shellenberger (@shellenberger) December 19, 2022

The New York Post writes:

Nearly four of five Americans who’ve followed the Hunter Biden laptop story believe truthful coverage would have changed the outcome of the 2020 presidential election.

Have any of those responsible for covering up the laptop story apologized for failing to do their job and verify the story when it mattered?

Nope. Have the more than 50 former senior intelligence officials who signed a letter saying the laptop story “has all the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation” issued a corrective statement, admitting their error? Again, no.