President Trump is taking “woke” head on.
And peak woke is the climate hoax, which is really just another way to extort money from the American people.
This is one of his best clips, watch here:
President Trump: "we have to defeat the climate hoaxsters!" pic.twitter.com/6ElugFGpY5
— DailyNoah.com (@DailyNoahNews) November 23, 2022
He’s 100% right!
Always fighting for America.
The scam has been exposed:
No human experiences 'climate change' in a lifetime, only seeing 'seasonal' weather. Climate change takes hundreds, thousands or tens of thousands of years. These forces are not short-term – for example, it takes a thousand years to lay down 1cm of sedimentary rock. It's a hoax. pic.twitter.com/PTnt7hcOmO
— Peter Clack (@PeterDClack) November 18, 2022
A hoax about carbon dioxide & the climate has caused a global energy & economic disaster. This is because the United Nations lied about CO2 & climate to peddle its own importance. CO2 sustains all life on earth but it's in long-term decline. Now we face the return of an ice-age. pic.twitter.com/iDlqa6eySO
— Peter Clack (@PeterDClack) November 20, 2022
I love this:
Thank you Jim for your honesty here:
Biden agrees to use U.S. taxpayer money for climate reparations to Third World countries. Of course, the climate change agenda is a hoax. But giving away your money is quite real.https://t.co/U3PMOICp68
— Jim Rickards (@JamesGRickards) November 19, 2022
Now let’s go deeper…
Have you heard of this?
Blood and Gore: The Untold Story Behind Al Gore’s Carbon Tax Company
You’d think I were making this up, but sadly I’m not.
Remember the whole Carbon Tax thing that Obama and the Dems were pushing?
Literally a tax on the air.
Funny, who is described in the Bible as the Prince of the Air?
Anyway, I digress.
Well, here’s the part I bet you didn’t know.
Al Gore was deep into it and had even formed a company with his friend David Blood to capitalize on the new Carbon Tax.
Yup, that’s right.
The Blood and Gore company.
You just CAN’T make this stuff up folks!
And in case you think I’m making it up, I’ve got a link to a Forbes article below to show you it’s sadly very real.
First, take a look at this:
Here are all the details folks, from Forbes no less:
Surprise! Al Gore and his carbon credit huckstering partner David Blood, both principals at Generation Investment Management (GIM), warn in their October 30 Wall Street Journal op/ed feature of peril to fossil fuel investments due to “The Coming Carbon Asset Bubble”. They argue that such “unwise and increasingly wreck less” investment strategies pose three broad risks which will cause carbon assets to become “stranded” and lose economic value: through direct government carbon regulation; as a result of market-share losses to “already competitive” renewable technologies; and due to “sociopolitical pressures” causing carbon-intensive businesses to lose their “license to operate”.
Marketing Climate Alarm:
Of course this carbon regulation is posited upon saving the Earth based upon a “consensus within the scientific community that increasing the global temperature by more than 2oC will likely cause devastating and irreversible damage to the planet.” And where it comes to promulgating and capitalizing upon carbon-climate-crazed sociopolitical pressure, you would be hard-pressed to find two better authorities.
Gore and Blood, the former chief of Goldman Sachs Asset Management (GSAM), co-founded London-based GIM in 2004. Between 2008 and 2011 the company had raised profits of nearly $218 million from institutions and wealthy investors. By 2008 Gore was able to put $35 million into hedge funds and private partnerships through the Capricorn Investment Group, a Palo Alto company founded by his Canadian billionaire buddy Jeffrey Skoll, the first president of EBay Inc. It was Skoll’s Participant Media that produced Gore’s feverishly frightening 2006 horror film, “An Inconvenient Truth”.
In 2007, following an investigation of the movie, Sir Michael Burton, a judge in London’s High Court, ruled that it can be shown in secondary schools only if accompanied by guidance notes for teachers to balance Mr. Gore’s “one-sided” views. Judge Barton pointed out that its “apocalyptical vision” was politically partisan, and not an impartial analysis. He stated: “It is built around the charismatic presence of the ex-vice president Al Gore, whose crusade is to persuade the world of the dangers of climate change caused by global warming…It is now common ground that this is not simply a science film- although it is based substantially on science research and opinion, but it is [clearly] a political film.”
As for taking their recent investment advice, it might be worth mentioning that some of GIM’s earlier low-carbon deals haven’t always worked out so great.
Optimistic that a Democrat-controlled Congress would pass cap-and-trade legislation Gore lobbied for, GIM and David Blood’s old GSAM firm took big stakes in the Chicago Climate Exchange (CCX) for carbon trading. Accordingly, CCX was poised to make windfall profits selling CO2 offsets if and when cap-and-trade was passed. Speaking before a 2007 Joint House Hearing of the Energy Science Committee, Gore told members: “As soon as carbon has a price, you’re going to see a wave [of investment] in it…There will be unchained investment.”
After all, what better way to reduce evil carbon than to make it a profitable commodity? But unfortunately for GIM and CCX investors, trading hot air credits proved just too good to be true.
Between May of 2008 and October of 2009 the CCX market value for one metric ton of carbon plummeted from $7 per metric ton to $0.10 along with the shareholders’ investment values. Losers included the Ford Motor Company, Amtrak, DuPont, Dow Corning, American Electric Power, International Paper, and Waste Management, along with the states of Illinois and New Mexico, seven cities, and a number of universities.
By 2010, GIM approximately doubled a 9.6% stake it had purchased in Camco International Ltd., a manager of products to limit greenhouse gases. But by October of that year disaster struck again. Republicans took control of the House, dashing all cap-and-capitalize hopes along with huge profit prospects for either Camco or CCX. The latter shut down operations in November of that year.
On top of that bad news, First Solar Inc., another GIM investment, got squeezed out of the solar panel market by cheaper Chinese products. According to Bloomberg, GIM dumped its last First Solar stock at a $165.9 million loss in 2012.
You can read the entire story here.
Also from their website, just in case you think I’m somehow making this all up, here they are so proudly together:
Here’s a full breakdown:
More on the Climate Scam here:
Bill Gates Says The World Is Ending Due To Climate Change
Oh, here we go again!
Another “the world is ending” prediction by another creepy “elite”.
Who is it today?
All good guesses.
It’s that depopulation freak, Bill Gates!
Apparently, being obsessed with pandemics isn’t enough for Gates, he’s now moved on to pushing “climate change” down our throats.
Take a look:
Ending the pandemic is "very, very easy" compared to solving climate change, says Bill Gates https://t.co/UWcHW7oAc1
— BBC News (World) (@BBCWorld) February 16, 2021
— World Climate Foundation (@wclimate) February 15, 2021
Ending the pandemic is "very, very easy" compared to solving climate change, says Bill Gates https://t.co/oFrangZxbx
— BBC News (World) (@BBCWorld) February 15, 2021
Raise your hand if you don’t give a damn what this guy thinks?
Actually, I take that back.
Raise your hand if you think the safest thing for humanity is to do the EXACT OPPOSITE of whatever this creep is pushing?
From Fox News:
Microsoft co-founder and philanthropist Bill Gates warned that there will be dire consequences if the world does not achieve zero net carbon emissions by the year 2050.
In his new book, “How to Avoid a Climate Disaster,” Gates says that it is imperative that the world go from the current 51 billion tons of emissions to zero within the next 30 years to avoid catastrophe.
“The migration that we saw out of Syria for their civil war, which was somewhat weather dependent, we’re going to have 10 times as much migration because the equatorial areas will become unlivable,” Gates told “Fox News Sunday” host Chris Wallace, warning what will happen if the goal is not reached. “We won’t be able to farm or go outside during the summer. Wildfires, even the farming productivity in the south of the U.S. – the droughts – will reduce productivity in the area dramatically.”
Gates went on to say that the loss of life would be greater than even the worst part of the coronavirus pandemic.
“The instability overall will be five times as many deaths at the peak of the pandemic and going up every year,” he said.
While 2050 is Gates’ cutoff point, he said this is really just a matter of “degree.”
“If we wait 10 more years it’s not as bad as if we wait 20 or we wait 30, because the temperature just keeps going up,” he said. Gates said he is looking at 2050 because it “happens to be the soonest realistic date for the world to change all of these sorts of emissions.”
Gates defended himself against criticisms from the left and right. Those on the left claim that he is not going far enough, and that he needs to support the Green New Deal, with efforts to reduce net emissions to zero by 2030.
“It’s completely unrealistic,” Gates said about the 2030 goal, saying that it will take at least 30 years to accomplish this.
Gates has also gotten flack for talking about the need to reduce emissions while he himself has a tremendous carbon footprint by living in a large home and flying on a private jet. He said his other actions make up for this.
“I am offsetting my carbon emissions by buying clean aviation fuel, and funding carbon capture and funding low-cost housing projects to use electricity instead of natural gas,” Gates said. He noted how expensive these efforts have been and said those costs must be driven down.
Bill, you are a massive creep and in my estimation extremely dangerous to the human population.
But let’s set that aside for a minute.
Let’s take a moment to enjoy all the “World Is Ending” predictions that have never happened.
When will we stop falling for it?
And what is this “offsetting my carbon” BS?
Does anyone have critical thinking skills anymore?
It’s ok for Gates and Kerry and all these losers to fly their private jets constantly all over the world as long as they buy some carbon credits in some stock market?
Are you kidding me?
Let’s assume for a moment that climate change is real and a big problem (I’m not in agreement, but let’s assume) and so let’s say your burning all sorts of carbon with your jets….and buying some piece of paper on a stock market is going to somehow fix that?
How stupid do they think we are?
Actually….sadly, they think we are VERY stupid.
Because they just keep running the same lame play time and time again and we fall for it every time.
Take a look:
Then I found this incredible list from AIE.org:
Below are the 41 failed doomsday, eco-pocalyptic predictions (with links):
1. 1967: Dire Famine Forecast By 1975
2. 1969: Everyone Will Disappear In a Cloud Of Blue Steam By 1989 (1969)
3. 1970: Ice Age By 2000
4. 1970: America Subject to Water Rationing By 1974 and Food Rationing By 1980
5. 1971: New Ice Age Coming By 2020 or 2030
6. 1972: New Ice Age By 2070
7. 1974: Space Satellites Show New Ice Age Coming Fast
8. 1974: Another Ice Age?
9. 1974: Ozone Depletion a ‘Great Peril to Life (data and graph)
10. 1976: Scientific Consensus Planet Cooling, Famines imminent
11. 1980: Acid Rain Kills Life In Lakes (additional link)
12. 1978: No End in Sight to 30-Year Cooling Trend (additional link)
13. 1988: Regional Droughts (that never happened) in 1990s
14. 1988: Temperatures in DC Will Hit Record Highs
15. 1988: Maldive Islands will Be Underwater by 2018 (they’re not)
16. 1989: Rising Sea Levels will Obliterate Nations if Nothing Done by 2000
17. 1989: New York City’s West Side Highway Underwater by 2019 (it’s not)
18. 2000: Children Won’t Know what Snow Is
19. 2002: Famine In 10 Years If We Don’t Give Up Eating Fish, Meat, and Dairy
20. 2004: Britain will Be Siberia by 2024
21. 2008: Arctic will Be Ice Free by 2018
22. 2008: Climate Genius Al Gore Predicts Ice-Free Arctic by 2013
23. 2009: Climate Genius Prince Charles Says we Have 96 Months to Save World
24. 2009: UK Prime Minister Says 50 Days to ‘Save The Planet From Catastrophe’
25. 2009: Climate Genius Al Gore Moves 2013 Prediction of Ice-Free Arctic to 2014
26. 2013: Arctic Ice-Free by 2015 (additional link)
27. 2014: Only 500 Days Before ‘Climate Chaos’
28. 1968: Overpopulation Will Spread Worldwide
29. 1970: World Will Use Up All its Natural Resources
30. 1966: Oil Gone in Ten Years
31. 1972: Oil Depleted in 20 Years
32. 1977: Department of Energy Says Oil will Peak in 1990s
33. 1980: Peak Oil In 2000
34. 1996: Peak Oil in 2020
35. 2002: Peak Oil in 2010
36. 2006: Super Hurricanes!
37. 2005 : Manhattan Underwater by 2015
38. 1970: Urban Citizens Will Require Gas Masks by 1985
39. 1970: Nitrogen buildup Will Make All Land Unusable
40. 1970: Decaying Pollution Will Kill all the Fish
41. 1970s: Killer Bees!
Update: I’ve added 9 additional failed predictions (via Real Climate Science) below to make it an even 50 for the number of failed eco-pocalyptic doomsday predictions over the last 50 years.
42. 1975: The Cooling World and a Drastic Decline in Food Production
43. 1969: Worldwide Plague, Overwhelming Pollution, Ecological Catastrophe, Virtual Collapse of UK by End of 20th Century
44. 1972: Pending Depletion and Shortages of Gold, Tin, Oil, Natural Gas, Copper, Aluminum
45. 1970: Oceans Dead in a Decade, US Water Rationing by 1974, Food Rationing by 1980
46. 1988: World’s Leading Climate Expert Predicts Lower Manhattan Underwater by 2018
47. 2005: Fifty Million Climate Refugees by the Year 2020
48. 2000: Snowfalls Are Now a Thing of the Past
49.1989: UN Warns That Entire Nations Wiped Off the Face of the Earth by 2000 From Global Warming
50. 2011: Washington Post Predicted Cherry Blossoms Blooming in Winter
But somehow this time will be different, and the ‘experts’ and 16-year olds of today will suddenly be correct in their new predictions of eco-doom and eco-disaster? Not.