Heads up folks!
It appears that the U.S. Supreme Court is about to confirm the power of States to nullify and overturn an election if that election is found to be fraudulent.
That would kind of be a big deal, right?
How do I know this is about to happen?
Because Hillary Clinton just made a very panicked video warning about this happening and bloviating about how dangerous this will be.
The decision has already been made and she’s in a panic over what will happen next.
So is all of D.C.
The video is short but tells you all you need to know…
Watch here on Rumble:
Hillary Clinton seems extremely concerned about how much power individual states are retaining. It’s almost like Trump’s original promise to bring power out of DC and back to the people is literally happening right now.
Does she realize the Constitution already put the state legislatures in control of this process?
What do I mean by that?
It’s simple…it’s all in the Constitution.
It’s called Article II, Section 1, Clause 2 and it reads like this:
Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress: but no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector.
The power has ALWAYS been with the States.
Because our founders were smart.
They knew a powerful, centralized Federal Government would eventually turn corrupt.
Spoiler alert: they were right.
They knew the best chance they had of success for our country was to distribute power among the 50 states, to keep power decentralized and democratized.
So the wrote Article II, Section 1, Clause 2.
It’s all very simple actually.
Congress.gov gives more explanation (I’ve bolded and underlined the key part):
The wordappointas used in Clause 2 confers on state legislaturesthe broadest power of determination.1 Upholding a state law providing for selection of electors by popular vote from districts rather than statewide, the Court described the variety of permissible methods.Therefore, on reference to contemporaneous and subsequent action under the clause, we should expect to find, as we do, that various modes of choosing the electors were pursued, as, by the legislature itself on joint ballot; by the legislature through a concurrent vote of the two houses; by vote of the people for a general ticket; by vote of the people in districts; by choice partly by the people voting in districts and partly by the legislature; by choice by the legislature from candidates voted for by the people in districts; and in other ways, as, notably, by North Carolina in 1792, and Tennessee in 1796 and 1800. No question was raised as to the power of the State to appoint, in any mode its legislature saw fit to adopt, and none that a single method, applicable without exception, must be pursued in the absence of an amendment to the Constitution. The district system was largely considered the most equitable, and Madison wrote that it was that system which was contemplated by the framers of the Constitution, although it was soon seen that its adoption by some States might place them at a disadvantage by a division of their strength, and that a uniform rule was preferable.2
Although Clause 2 seemingly vests complete discretion in the states, certain older cases had recognized a federal interest in protecting the integrity of the process. Thus, the Court upheld the power of Congress to protect the right of all citizens who are entitled to vote to lend aid and support in any legal manner to the election of any legally qualified person as a presidential elector.3 Its power to protect the choice of electors from fraud or corruption was sustained.4If this government is anything more than a mere aggregation of delegated agents of other States and governments, each of which is superior to the general government, it must have the power to protect the elections on which its existence depends from violence and corruption. If it has not this power it is helpless before the two great natural and historical enemies of all republics, open violence and insidious corruption.5
More recently, substantial curbs on state discretion have been instituted by both the Court and the Congress. In Williams v. Rhodes,6 the Court struck down a complex state system that effectively limited access to the ballot to the electors of the two major parties. In the Court’s view, the system violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment because it favored some and disfavored others and burdened both the right of individuals to associate together to advance political beliefs and the right of qualified voters to cast ballots for electors of their choice. For the Court, Justice Black denied that the language of Clause 2 immunized such state practices from judicial scrutiny.7 Then, in Oregon v. Mitchell,8 the Court upheld the power of Congress to reduce the voting age in presidential elections9 and to set a thirty-day durational residency period as a qualification for voting in presidential elections.10 Although the Justices were divided on the reasons, the rationale emerging from this case, considered with Williams v. Rhodes,11 is that the Fourteenth Amendment limits state discretion in prescribing the manner of selecting electors and that Congress in enforcing the Fourteenth Amendment12 may override state practices that violate that Amendment and may substitute standards of its own.
Whether state enactments implementing the authority to appoint electors are subject to the ordinary processes of judicial review within a state, or whether placement of the appointment authority in state legislatures somehow limits the role of state judicial review, became an issue during the controversy over the Florida recount and the outcome of the 2000 presidential election. The Supreme Court did not resolve this issue, but in a remand to the Florida Supreme Court, suggested that the role of state courts in applying state constitutions may be constrained by operation of Clause 2.13 Three Justices elaborated on this view in Bush v. Gore,14 but the Court ended the litigation—and the recount—on the basis of an equal protection interpretation, without ruling on the Article II argument.
Is this how President Trump returns?
I think it’s very possible.
Explaining “Devolution” and Trump’s Return
Have you been hearing more and more about “devolution”?
Confused about what it means?
I’ve got you covered.
Let’s start here:
Praying Medic did a great summary that will get you started in understand this concept:
A few weeks ago, my wife came across a series of articles written by an anonymous blogger who proposed the possibility that President Trump’s administration is covertly being preserved by the U.S military through a process called devolution. I realize that this idea may sound unbelievable and many people who could not mentally adjust to Trump’s election loss convinced themselves that he had somehow managed to remain President. In their minds, Trump was still occupying the oval office, and Biden was on a TV set somewhere. This is not one of those theories. Rather, it is the logical conclusion one might arrive at if they had conducted an enormous amount of research.
The word “devolution” as it is used in the context of government refers to the delegation of powers from a central government to regional or local entities. As it pertains to this discussion, it suggests that Trump and the military have established regional hubs of governmental authority and this fact is known only to those who are directly involved. A number of people have uncovered documents and pieced together key events supporting the idea that Trump put in place a mechanism by which he could remain Commander in Chief, even as Joe Biden appears to be President.
The premise that Trump could do this is based on the idea that America has been in an undeclared war with China since at least January of 2020. Trump has said on several occasions that when China allowed covid-19 to escape Wuhan, they committed an act of war. When the U.S. is at war—even when it is an undeclared war—the President has powers not available to him in peacetime. These powers do not require congressional approval and many times when they are exercised, the public is not aware. The President can, in wartime, take whatever steps are deemed necessary to save the Republic.
The devolution theory revolves around a number of presidential memoranda, executive orders, and odd personnel changes made in 2020 related to national security. The key players involved are Chris Miller, Kash Patel, and Ezra Cohen-Watnick, who held positions in the Pentagon and the National Counterterrorism Center prior to, and after the election.
Central to the devolution theory is that Trump knew the election would be stolen by a foreign power, and he viewed this as an act of war. In response, he preemptively and covertly took steps to invalidate the outcome of the election. The measures he took are known only to a handful of people, but they effectively make him the true Commander in Chief. A decision was made to allow the public to believe Joe Biden is President, but at a later date, we will be informed of the truth.
Further, the theory proposes that a few key military assets around the country are covertly supporting Trump, while most of the military believes Biden is calling the shots. At a future time—perhaps when indisputable evidence of election fraud is made public—the military and Trump will make their big reveal.
One objection to the theory is the adoption of “woke” ideology by military leaders. Critics say that the military has gone soft and would not support Trump today. The U.S. military is comprised of approximately one million people who come from all walks of life, who espouse diverse ideologies and have different loyalties. It’s a gross oversimplification to say “the military is corrupt,” or “the military is woke.” The military is highly compartmentalized. The ideologies and loyalties of one group are not universally embraced by other groups.
Members of Special Operations teams are selected from a large number of applicants based on specific criteria including loyalty. You’re not going to find wokeism being promoted in their ranks. These men and women are patriots, and the devolution articles suggest that these are the very people Trump is working with.
The Devolution Won't Be Televised!…https://t.co/6CFsVQpPTM
— OptimalRedPiller (@PillerRed) August 1, 2021
You can watch the interview here:
Devolution is happening. Big reveal soon!https://t.co/DSmGVHLpoc
— John Maneri (@JohnManeri) July 31, 2021
More here from Patel Patriot:
What is Devolution?
The concept of Devolution is fundamental and part of the government’s top-secret continuity of government plans. I will cover the continuity of government plans in detail in a future post. Check out this Newsweek article from 2020. While the report presents Devolution in the context of the pandemic, it still provides enough detail to prove that Devolution exists and was a topic explored by Trump.
From the Newsweek Article
The article was published March 18, 2020, and claims, “Standby orders were issued more than three weeks ago to ready these plans…”. That means in February of 2020. Trump had ordered the military to review and prepare the continuity of government plans. I think the timeline of this is essential.
Note this article regarding a “fringe theory” being thrown around by Senator Tom Cotton and notice the date. A “theory” stating the virus originated from a biosafety lab pops up around the same time Trump is ordering the military to prepare continuity of government plans.
Today we know that this “theory” is almost certainly true. It’s safe to assume military intelligence was all over this at the time, even though Trump didn’t publicly state that he had seen evidence that the virus came from the lab until May 1, 2020.
There is so much disinformation still surrounding the Covid-19 pandemic and that is by design. Was it an accident? Was it a bio-weapon? Depending on the platform you use, you may not even be allowed to ask those questions. However the answer to those questions is key to the Devolution theory because it was the launching pad for the theft of the 2020 election and ultimately the pretext for Trump having our military prepare for Devolution.
If you look objectively at Trump’s handling of China, his policies were pro-American rather than the pro-China approach of previous administrations. In August of 2017, he directed the Office of the United States Trade Representative to investigate Chinese economic practices. Their subsequent report attacked many aspects of China’s monetary policy.
Trump began imposing tariffs on Chinese products referencing “a trade deficit of $500 Billion a year with Intellectual Property Theft of another $300 Billion.” (I’ll cover this IP theft in a future post) These tariffs led to a “trade war” that culminated in the Phase One trade deal signing on January 15 of 2020.
Why is that date important? Because the very next day, Trump’s impeachment trial in the senate began.
Think back to August 2019.
The pressure is building on the Biden family for their ties to Ukraine and China. It almost feels like Durham would drop the hammer any day on the Obama administration for Spygate. The “Whistle-blower” comes forward with the quid-pro-quo accusation, and an impeachment inquiry in the House of Representatives is underway. However, with a Republican majority in the Senate and no evidence of a quid-pro-quo, everybody knows the President will be acquitted.
The America-first platform Trump campaigned on was working. The economy was booming. He was winning the “trade war” with China. None of the scandals thrown at him had stuck. He was unscathed through Impeachment. Along with the other two most significant threats to America (Democrats and the media), China was desperate to get Trump out of office. China favored a Biden presidency, and as found on Hunter Biden’s Laptop; they would have an equity stake in the Biden administration.
Although the fake polls said otherwise, the Democrats appeared to have little chance in 2020. The momentum was palpable. The only way the democrats would be able to win the election was to steal it.
How convenient that Covid-19 would present them such an opportunity.
Now you can decide for yourself whether the leak was intentional or not, but what did PDJT himself say?
“We went through the worst attack we’ve ever had on our country”.
Everything about the election of 2020 was controversial. Sitting Presidents don’t gain votes and not get re-elected. Obama had 3 million less votes and was re-elected with a total of almost 66 million votes. Trump gained almost 12 million votes and lost with a total of over 74 million votes. It was evident Covid-19 was a pretext for mass numbers of mail-in voting. A famous politician once said:
“Mail-in ballots are extremely susceptible to fraud” – Jerry “Pampers” Nadler
Local Democrat officials and RINOs unconstitutionally changed election laws in swing states to create more mail-in voting.
Trump saw this coming a mile away.
There are thousands of examples out there just like these and even a few prior to 2020:
So what do you do as President when you know fraudulent activity runs rampant through our federal elections? You take action. Everybody underestimated Trump during the 2016 election. There was still fraud, but he was able to overcome it. They were underprepared because they believed their own fake polls and thought Trump had no chance. He knew just like everybody else, that cheating was their only path to victory so he prepared for it.
On May 11, 2017, he established the Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity.
In September, he signed an Executive Order Imposing Certain Sanctions in the Event of Foreign Interference in a United States Election.
In November of 2018, he created the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency.
In December of 2019 Trump created the Space Force.
I will cover his time in office in detail in a future post but these actions signify that Trump was proactively taking steps to deter an election theft.
The Actual Theory
President Trump, with assistance from the United States Military, caught our foreign adversaries aiding the democrats with the theft of an election. This is bigger than just mere corruption and scandal.
This is war.
They let Biden assume office but it doesn’t mean anything. Any damage done can and will be reversed. They are basically playing house. Their time “in office” will only lead to more people wanting Trump back. Biden has no meaningful operational control over the military (I will cover that in a future post) and they won’t let any real harm come to us while the battlefield is prepped for whatever reveal is coming.
If you look at actions Trump took leading up to the election he was prepared for anything the democrats might pull. Our military intelligence (Space Force) monitored and captured the true vote count. I believe the audits will be eye-opening and kick everything off.
“If Trump had the vote count, why didn’t he do anything? Why haven’t we seen any “real” proof of voter fraud”?
Covid changed everything. When Trump said Covid was an attack, he stated that it was “worse than Pearl Harbor.” If PDJT had information that the Democrats would steal the election with help from China, that would be considered an act of war. Do you think that is something Trump would allow? Would our military let China install a puppet as President? We prepared for Devolution after gathering information on the lab leak and activated it sometime between November 3rd and January 20th.
“It’s too late, the electoral college voted for Biden”… “there is no legal precedent outlined in the constitution for him to be reinstated”.. Blah Blah Blah.
We are in a completely unprecedented situation.
If the military came out tomorrow and showed you definitive proof that China assisted the democrats in stealing the election, would you say, “oh well, no precedent. Can you show me to my assigned gulag?” or would you say “F&@% that, this can’t be allowed to stand.” Trump chose the latter.
We need to step back and review everything that has happened since the release of Covid. Our enemies conspired to attack the U.S.A. with a bioweapon to steal an election with one of our political parties. That is the actual coup.
We’ve been thinking too small.
Do you know who hasn’t been thinking too small?
President Donald John Trump
Much more here:
Devolution – Part 1: https://patelpatriot.substack.com/p/devolution
Devolution – Part 2: https://patelpatriot.substack.com/p/devolution-part-2
Devolution – Part 3: https://patelpatriot.substack.com/p/devolution-part-3
Devolution – Part 4: https://patelpatriot.substack.com/p/devolution-part-4
Devolution – Part 5: https://patelpatriot.substack.com/p/devolution-part-5
Devolution – Part 6: https://patelpatriot.substack.com/p/devolution-part-6
Devolution – Part 7: https://patelpatriot.substack.com/p/devolution-part-7
Patel Patriot’s Telegram chat: https://t.me/patelpatriotchat
And I’ll give you even more if you want it…
Clif High: The Three Routes for Trump’s Comeback!
Yesterday, I covered Clif High’s recent interview with Greg Hunter and how you can fight back and reclaim your health if you took the poison vax and now regret it!
If you want more on that, I’ve copied it below.
But right now I want to cover a different part of the interview that was absolutely fascinating.
Keep in mind, Clif is a data guy.
He ran a key department of Microsoft in the 1990’s and he knows how to mine and analyze big chunks of data. That’s his specialty.
And from that big data he has become very successful at predicting what is coming next in our world.
I write more about that below if you want examples.
But for right now, let’s talk about his latest data and how it affects President Trump and his return.
Greg Hunter asked Clif what his data is showing for Trump’s return and he had some really interesting comments.
First he says the data is showing with almost 100% certainty that Biden and the whole Biden Administration is OUT in 2021. Almost no doubt to that.
But what comes next is what’s a little more open ended right now.
Clif’s data show’s three possibilities of how things may play out and he discusses each of those in the interview below.
Watch the interview here from Rumble (it comes towards the middle to end of the interview):
And if you want more from Clif on health and the vaccine, keep reading….
***SPECIAL REPORT ON FIGHTING BACK AFTER TAKING THE POISON VAX***
The two most frequently asked questions I get from readers are: (1) Why is President Trump pushing the vax? And (2) what can I do if I already took it, am I doomed?
To answer #1, I published a post a couple days ago with some thoughts.
You can read that here:
Now to deal with Question #2.
A brand new interview between Greg Hunter and Clif High gives some great direction.
First, let me make a disclaimer: I am not a doctor. Greg Hunter is not a doctor. And Clif High is not a doctor.
But for anyone who knows Clif, he tends to be right about a lot of things because he runs massive data gathering bots that have proven over the years to be highly accurate.
Here’s just one example: he said back in 2018 or so that eventually Bitcoin would rise to $64,000 and then stop. He said it would be the “$64,000 dollar question” and then it would drop by about half it’s value before heading back up again to $100,000.
Keep in mind this was back when Bitcoin was something like $3,000 and no one thought it would ever go over $20,000.
Well….what just happened last month?
It did EXACTLY what Clif said. It hit $64,000 and then stopped and then fell to $30,000.
That’s just one example, but I’ve seen many, many more from Clif.
So suffice it to say when “Uncle Clif” speaks about something, I tend to listen!
When he went on Greg Hunter’s show, Greg asked him if there’s anything people can do to recover their health if they took the C-19 vaccine….
Clif says yes, and the “prescription” is actually quite simple.
I’m going to give you a big disclaimer right off the bat…..
DISCLAIMER: I’m not a doctor and I don’t practice medicine.
And I’m not giving you medical advice.
But let’s be honest….I think I can probably do better than the “doctors” like Dr. Fraudci, Dr. Birxx who lie to you and serve you up a big heaping pile of propaganda!
You can probably take whatever they tell you to do and just do the opposite and you’d probably be pretty close to an ideal course of action!
So no, I’m not a doctor, but if being a doctor puts you in the same class as Dr. FRAUDci, then I take not being a doctor as a badge of honor.
I’m a reporter.
I simply report what I hear and see from others.
To paraphrase a once great network: I report, you decide!
But what I can report is that it sure looks like some very basic stuff can drastically help you recover and protect your body going forward!
Vitamin C, Vitamin D, Chaga Mushroom Tea, C60, and of course hydroxychloroquine may be highly effective!
If you scroll down, I have links for you.
But first I want to give you some more background.
Watch this video where Clif High explains what the spike protein is actually doing to your body, why it is definitely a bio-weapon, and how each of the items listed above can help:
Here is one more where he goes into even more detail and in this one he talks about the power of C60 and why you need to get some!
Ever since you were a kid, you were told to get your vitamins!
It’s basic advice that was good then and is still good now!
You need large doses of the right kind of Vitamin C, 10-15,000 IU’s of Vitamin D to maintain certain blood levels, and then Clif recommends C60 too.
Watch the interview here from Rumble (they discuss it in the first 10 minutes) and then scroll down for links to where you can get the best of each item:
If you want to follow Clif’s advice, here are some links to the products I like to use.
You want to get “Liposomal” Vitamin C, very important.
And in case that sells out, which tends to happen, this is another good one:
Now on to Vitamin D.
Here is my current favorite and the one I personally take:
And a backup:
And Chaga Mushroom Tea:
And we end with C60.
I’ve been personally taking C60 for over a year and I have not came down with COVID. Just saying.
Regardless of COVID, I love taking it and have noticed multiple benefits.
Here’s what some people have reported:
As I understand it, C60 is a powerful antioxidant (172x the power of Vitamin C), antiviral, antibacterial and anti-inflammatory.
I liked it so much I actually contacted the company and got everyone who is reading this a deal.
The company is called C60Evo.
I love this stuff and I think you will too.
Cheers to good health and a big thank you to Clif High for putting out this information!
No, I’m not promising you won’t get COVID, but I am saying that TAKING YOUR VITAMINS and powerful ANTIOXIDANTS is a good idea!