FOIA Request Reveals CDC Did NOT Monitor VAERS for COVID-19 Jab Safety Signals

In response to a Freedom of Information Request submitted by Children’s Health Defense, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention last week admitted it never analyzed the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) for safety signals for COVID-19 jabs.

New FOIA Release Shows CDC Lied about Its VAERS Safety Monitoring Efforts. The reason they never found any safety signals is because they didn't look for them, then claimed absence of evidence was evidence of absence. Disgraceful. 🧵https://t.co/llkEgj7I8F@CDCgov @CDCDirector

— Josh Guetzkow (@joshg99) June 17, 2022

For roughly a year now, the VAERS data has undoubtedly shown the COVID-19 shots to be the most dangerous injections in United States history.

In the updated OpenVAERS data, there were 1.3 million total reports and nearly 29,000 reported deaths following the COVID-19 shots.

#VAERS injury numbers for the week through 6-10-22 now available at https://t.co/qbg1Z54mo8. #ThisIsInfanticide#CanWeTalkAboutIt pic.twitter.com/sIdSpPoPQf

— OpenVAERS (@OpenVAERS) June 17, 2022

And VAERS is notorious for under-reporting the actual number of vaccine-related injuries and deaths.

Although it’s far from perfect, the database provided clear indicators that the COVID-19 shots were incredibly dangerous.

However, the CDC turned a blind eye to the gargantuan number of reports, hospitalizations, and deaths following the toxic injections.

Josh Guetzkow explains in The Defender:

Since CDC officials stated publicly that “COVID-19 vaccine safety monitoring is the most robust in U.S. history,” I had assumed that at the very least, CDC officials were monitoring VAERS using the methods they described in a briefing document posted on the CDC website in January 2021 (and updated in February 2022, with minor changes).

I was wrong.

The lynchpin of their safety monitoring was to mine VAERS data for safety signals by calculating what are known as proportional reporting ratios (PRR’s).

This is a method of comparing the proportion of different types of adverse events reported for a new vaccine to the proportion of those events reported for an older, established vaccine.

If the new vaccine shows a significantly higher reporting rate of a particular adverse event relative to the old one, it counts as a safety signal that should then trigger a more thorough investigation.

The briefing document states, “CDC will perform PRR data mining on a weekly basis or as needed.”

And yet, in the agency’s response to the FOIA request, it wrote that “no PRRs were conducted by CDC. Furthermore, data mining is outside of the agency’s purview.”

The agency suggested contacting the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), which was supposed to perform a different type of data mining, according to the briefing document.

CDC officials repeatedly claimed they have not seen safety signals in VAERS.

*Source – The Defender*

After failing to monitor the catastrophic increase in vaccine side effects caused by the COVID-19 shots, the CDC has authorized the experimental shots for babies and toddlers.

JUST IN: CDC Director Rochelle Walensky signs off on Moderna and Pfizer/BioNTech COVID-19 shots for children five years and younger.

Inoculations for children aged six months and older can begin this coming week.

— DailyNoah.com (@DailyNoahNews) June 18, 2022

The agency is an utter disgrace and deserves to be disbanded for its corruption and incompetency.

Further details HERE.