Skip to main content
We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here.

Is Hunter Biden to Blame for the What’s Going on Between Russia and Ukraine?


3,948 views

Is Hunter Biden to blame for the war in Ukraine?

It’s impossible to blame any single one person for this war with the exception of Vladamir Putin.

But why did Putin act? Why did Putin feel safe attacking Ukraine now under Joe Biden?

Did Hunter Biden have anything to do with that?

It appears that the U.S. government believes so.

When have you heard that in the news?

The U.S. Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs and the U.S. Senate Committee on Finance Majority Staff Report published a report on Hunter Biden.

Folks, this report sounds pretty damning.

Just take a look at the title:

Hunter Biden, Burisma, and Corruption: The Impact on U.S. Government Policy and Related Concerns

Based on the title of the study alone, it’s clear that our own government appears to blame Hunter Biden for a shift in American foreign policy.

Can you imagine if the government published a study about one of the Trump kids?

Don’t you think the media would cover it?

Yet after the publication of this study, the media doesn’t seem to care.

But they should.

Because Russia has invaded Ukraine.

Russia has threatened nuclear war against the United States.

Russia has proclaimed that World War 3 has started.

Putin is clearly out of control…

But do you honestly think that any of this would have happened under President Trump?

I think we all know that the answer is no!

According to the Senate:

Hunter Biden’s position on the board created an immediate potential conflict of interest that would prove to be problematic for both U.S. and Ukrainian officials and would affect the implementation of Ukraine policy.

In other words, YES, the Burisma story was a critical, real, and important story, especially concerning national security.

Because President Trump was the Commander in Chief, this means that investing Hunter Biden was his responsibility.

Why?

Because as Commander in Chief, all national security interests were his responsibility.

To make matters worse, apparently Obama knew about this conflict of interest:

What the Chairmen discovered during the course of this investigation is that the Obama administration knew that Hunter Biden’s position on Burisma’s board was problematic and did interfere in the efficient execution of policy with respect to Ukraine.

Not only did Obama know this, but it appears that Obama’s foreign policy itself was weakened because of Hunter Biden.

The investigators discovered:

The Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs (HSGAC) and the Senate Committee on Finance undertook this investigation into potential conflicts of interest, and the involvement of the Biden family in foreign business ventures while Joe Biden was vice president, following allegations that the Obama administration’s Ukraine policy could have been affected by Hunter Biden’s position on the board of Burisma, and that family members may have improperly sought to benefit from their relationship with the vice president.

In other words, Hunter Biden was a clear conflict of interest for our foreign policy.

But that wasn’t enough: his family profited from this connection.

They didn’t just profit from it — they appeared to intentionally extort it.

Again, can you imagine if President Trump or any of his kids did this?!

https://twitter.com/17StQrm/status/1509198998669860881

But that’s not all that was in the report:

Because the vice president’s son had a direct link to a corrupt company and its owner, State Department officials were required to maintain situational awareness of Hunter Biden’s association with Burisma. Unfortunately, U.S. officials had no other choice but to endure the “awkward[ness]” of continuing to push an anticorruption agenda in Ukraine while the vice president’s son sat on the board of a Ukrainian company with a corrupt owner. As George Kent testified, he “would have advised any American not to get on the board of Zlochevsky’s company.” 429 Yet, even though Hunter Biden’s position on Burisma’s board cast a shadow over the work of those advancing anticorruption reforms in Ukraine, the Committees are only aware of two individuals who raised concerns to their superiors. Despite the efforts of these individuals, their concerns appear to have fallen on deaf ears.

Basically, this means that federal officials were not efficiently able to fulfill their duties.

Their duties were impeded by the apparent conflict of interest by Hunter Biden.

But wait… it gets worse.

We all know by know that Hunter Biden was involved in shady dealings in Ukraine.

But did you know that he apparently also had shady dealings in Russia as well?

SIGN THE PETITION: We Need National Voter ID!

In other words, no matter which way the war goes, money will be flowing into pockets…

Hunter Biden and his associate, Archer, had a financial relationship with Russian businesswoman Elena Baturina. Baturina is the former wife of the late Yuri Luzhkov, who was the mayor of Moscow and was fired in 2010 by then-Russian president Dmitry Medvedev over corruption allegations.

You can read the entire report here.

If you learned something reading this article, please share this article with your friends.

The American people deserve to know the truth.

Again, the full text of the report is here.



 

Join the conversation!

Please share your thoughts about this article below. We value your opinions, and would love to see you add to the discussion!

Hey, Noah here!

Wondering where we went?

Read this and bookmark our new site!

See you over there!

Thanks for sharing!