Michael Sussmann has been found not guilty…
Critics say that the evidence against him was overwhelming, but the jury did not believe the evidence condemned Sussmann beyond a shadow of a doubt…
Sussmann was charged with lying to the F.B.I., and several damning texts were attributed to Sussmann which investigators claim directly proved his guilt.
It remains to be seen if Sussmann will end up in court again following new findings from the Durham investigation…
Trending: WATCH: Former Pfizer VP Urges All Women of Child-Bearing Age to Reject Experimental COVID-19 Jabs
Here’s what we currently know:
TURLEY: “I mean, he is facing a jury that has three Clinton donors, an AOC donor, and a woman whose daughter is on the same sports team with Sussmann’s daughter. With the exception of randomly selecting people out of the DNC headquarters, you could not come up with a worse jury” pic.twitter.com/RHqen6AMAc
— Benny Johnson (@bennyjohnson) May 26, 2022
Corporate media downplayed Sussman trial while its testimony confirmed their own corruption, and that of Clinton and FBI. Now that he's (as expected) been acquitted, tweets aplenty! they were and are active co-conspirators in one of greatest political scandals in our history.
— Mollie (@MZHemingway) May 31, 2022
Fox News confirmed:
After a two week trial, and more than a day of deliberations, the jury found that Special Counsel John Durham’s team had not proven beyond a reasonable doubt that Sussmann’s statement was a lie, and that he was, in fact, working on behalf of Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign and technology executive Rodney Joffe when he brought two thumb drives and a white paper alleging a Trump-Russia connection.
Michael Sussmann has been acquitted.
A DC jury protects its own. https://t.co/cu6S5nEFMO
— Techno Fog (@Techno_Fog) May 31, 2022
I mean, they admitted to it!!! What else was needed to convict???
“Sussmann, who worked for Clinton, acquitted of lying to FBI in 2016”
The verdict is a defeat for Special Counsel John Durham, appointed three years ago by then-At…
— See more on GETTR https://t.co/IuH7eMzxHt— Jason Miller (@JasonMillerinDC) May 31, 2022
The left-wing Washington Post explains:
The jury ultimately rejected those claims, apparently swayed by the argument from Sussmann’s lawyer, Sean Berkowitz, who said the prosecution was trying to turn a brief 30-minute meeting more than five years ago into a “giant political conspiracy theory.”
Join the conversation!
Please share your thoughts about this article below. We value your opinions, and would love to see you add to the discussion!