Several months ago, a Trump-appointed judge demanded Pfizer release its data to the public. For months we were told to simply trust in the pharmaceutical company’s claims and accept the bullying of politicians telling us to take it.
The judge’s demand has given us a glimpse at the data Pfizer hasn’t wanted us to see and it’s not looking good. Pfizer is releasing the data in a series of massive data dumps. The latest one was just released a few days ago and tops out at a whopping 80,000 pages.
This should be huge news yet why is the mainstream media refusing to report on, well, any of it? One reason could be the glaring inconsistencies between what we were told on their news networks and what the data actually shows.
Dr. Claire Craig, launched into a Twitter thread exposing the errors in their reporting when it came to follow-up after the second dose of the vaccine. It turns out that the post-treatment surveys may have been completed by only a fraction of the test patients.
Where are the 25,706 patients missing from the Pfizer data?
There’s a *big* gap between Pfizer’s claims and what their latest data release shows.
— Dr Clare Craig (not one of her impersonators) (@ClareCraigPath) May 5, 2022
Another thing to notice is the odd assortment of test patients they used for their study. 83% were White while Black or African Americans only made up 9%. If certain reports. and claims are to be believed, something like this could indicate their desire to suppress the potential effects their vaccine would have on minority populations.
The appearance of something like this would not play well on the airwaves of mainstream media. Especially given their desire to appear “woke”.
There is a huge issue with the timeline Pfizer is claiming to have used in their report. The dates just don’t add up. Unless they have found a way to access a Marvel-like multiverse where time and space fold on themselves, things look very suspicious.
The first patient to be recruited was recruited on 27th July 2020.
So the number who had 2 months follow up after the 2nd dose was a big fat zero.
Perhaps this was the world’s worst typo and they meant 2 months follow up after the first dose – what then? pic.twitter.com/PMLdJOaO2n
— Dr Clare Craig (not one of her impersonators) (@ClareCraigPath) May 5, 2022
Most major news outlets pride themselves on the objective accuracy of their reporting. This latest data dump is proving that is a falsehood. It’s clear most of their reporting was based on marketing literature and not data.
BREAKING: Pfizer-BioNTech says its Covid-19 vaccine is safe and effective for children ages 5 to 11, and that the companies will submit their data to the FDA for emergency use authorization. https://t.co/SWNaavAJZA
— MSNBC (@MSNBC) September 20, 2021
Here’s another clip of mainstream pundits assuring people, on national television that sticking an untested vaccine in your toddler’s arm is a good idea.
1/ Good news today for many parents!
Pfizer is applying for FDA authorization of 2 doses of its COVID vaccine in kids aged 6 months to 5 years.
The COVID vaccine is SAFE in all kids 6 months to 5 years.
Kids 2-5 years may need a 3rd dose.
with @MSNBC‘s @KatyTurNBC pic.twitter.com/w8S3ii6cDT
— Céline Gounder, MD, ScM, FIDSA 🇺🇦 (@celinegounder) February 1, 2022
That tweet did not age well. You have to also love how mainstream media outlets have amnesia when it comes to their misleading reporting. After months of telling parents, they were crazy to not let their children have the vaccine when offered, they turn tail and tell us the vaccines are not actually safe for their 5-year-old.
So now that the FDA has paused Johnson&Johnson vaccine for blood clots are YouTube and MSNBC all the websites that tried to SILENCE people for saying these vaccines are NOT SAFE going to make COMPENSATION to people for SPREADING MISINFORMATION?https://t.co/Pz42Duv65J
— Black Authority (@TheBlackChannel) April 13, 2021
Really, geniuses? An experimental drug with no long-term or exhaustive testing may not be safe for my child that can’t even read yet. You don’t say.
The reason the mainstream media is under-reporting such significant data is that they refuse to take responsibility for their own actions. They bullied, vilified, and demonized Americans for having questions about the vaccine.
Mainstream media could not believe anyone would dare question the integrity of a FOR-PROFIT, publically traded company whose main responsibility is to its shareholders, not the American public.
Pfizer sent this graph to the FDA in December 2020.
They said it was from their trial data & it showed near complete protection from contracting SARS-COV-2 for up to 120 days with only 1 mRNA shot.
Reality & 18 months of data since then shows this to be a complete fabrication. pic.twitter.com/KhrM7rDxJk
— KB (@halftwottered) May 6, 2022
And yet, as is often the case, conservatives and free independent thinkers are proven to be right. We can ask the question, but we already know the answer. The media is going to keep suppressing the truth because it does not fit their narrative.
Thankfully, with true conservatives still willing to take a stand, there are other ways to get the truth out there.
Join the conversation!
Please share your thoughts about this article below. We value your opinions, and would love to see you add to the discussion!