Establishment media and the Left have been silent about the recent data dump Pfizer was ordered to release by a Trump-appointed judge. There’s so much of it, that they are having to release it in batches. The latest documents confirm what many had suspected regarding the safety and efficacy of their vaccine. MedPage Today details how the data dump came to be.
The agency released 55,000 pages of COVID-19 vaccine review documents last Tuesday, following a loss in court months earlier that forced it to expedite its process to make the information available to the public.
In a January court order, U.S. District Judge Mark Pittman of the Northern District of Texas required the FDA to release around 12,000 documents immediately, and then 55,000 pages a month until all documents are released — totaling more than 300,000 pages.
Thousands of conservatives and medical professionals are still in the early stages of sifting through the mountain of data. However what people are finding paints a very ugly picture of what many have been mandated to inject into their bodies. Stuff is coming out into the open and it stinks to high heaven.
FDA was FOIA’d to provide data on Pfizer’s mRNA product. They wanted it hidden for 75 yrs.
Truth is finally being exposed. 80,000 docs have dropped. We’re finding out why they wanted it hidden. This is just the beginning which is bad enough#pfizerdocuments #Pfizer https://t.co/7MPCCr2yI1
— Diane4Peace⌛️ #FreeAssange! (@Soozieceu) May 5, 2022
Things did seem fishy when Pfizer started negotiating with the FDA to drip-feed the required data a little bit at a time. Turns out they wanted to make the American people wait up to 75 years to get a full picture of what really happened in the development of the vaccine.
In a November joint status report, the FDA proposed releasing around 500 pages of the documents each month — which would fulfill the organization’s FOIA request in about 55 to 75 years.
In spite of what looks like the FDA and Pfizer working together to stonewall the full truth from coming out, the whole development process was so botched that there isn’t any amount of redacting that can hide the nightmare that this was.
In case you missed it in the thread above, we will share the clip below. A respected medical researcher, Dr. Robert Malone explained to The New American how Pfizer’s withholding of data could constitute medical fraud. See the clip below:
URGENT PFIZER NEWS: Pfizer and the CDC committed fraud for willfully withholding critical data from the public resulting in harm and death to thousands. The CDC is spreading medical misinformation. What they have done is obscene. We are completely vindicated.
Thread 1 of 3 pic.twitter.com/311Ie9IcdH
— Truth Justice (@LakovosJustice_) May 4, 2022
One of the most disturbing portions of the report is in regards to pregnant and nursing women taking the vaccine. A scroll through Twitter and you will find all sorts of claims about this. It’s easy to fall for some outlandish accusations that are uncorroborated. But there are plenty of findings linked directly to the report that is troubling enough.
Take this for example.
Pfizer documents release confirm the vaccine should NOT (was not recommended due to the unknown outcomes) have been given to pregnant women. This must be a crime against humanity as this was promoted as ‘safe’ by U.K. govt for pregnant women.
— Gail Hannaford🌷 (@weddingexpert) May 5, 2022
The report, which would have logically been provided in part to the leaders of national and international health organizations did not stop governments from recommending pregnant and nursing women take the vaccine. As the Twitter user references, the U.K. greenlit the action when the data specifically excluded pregnant women from their study.
This should anger everybody. Here are medical professionals, declaring with absolute certainty that the vaccine is safe in any trimester.
This is even more terrifying. pic.twitter.com/K4TSy6C0WE
— Erin Elizabeth Health Nut News (@unhealthytruth) May 4, 2022
This seems medically irresponsible. Here are screenshots straight from the Pfizer report confirming that they had no basis to believe what they were saying was in fact true :
— Kevin Kiumbe (@Kiumbe_k) May 4, 2022
Pfizer’s official doc. PH advice was for pregnant women to speak to their docs. Docs did not have this information so could not give informed consent. Document says clearly to avoid if pregnant. Pfizer tried to block realise of doc for 75 years. Do people get it yet? #pfizer pic.twitter.com/KxsDiy7x1z
— Alex Gentry (@AGentry_92) May 6, 2022
But what about after the report? There must have been additional testing specifically for pregnant patients. The answer is yes. But the context of what kind of testing is outrageous.
Dr. Naomi Wolf, who is in the process of going through the entire report, highlights Pfizer went about testing the safety of their vaccines for pregnant women.
Dr. Naomi Wolf: “This 42-day study on 44 pregnant rats led them to conclude that there were ‘no effects on female fertility,’ [but the people conducting this study] were employed by and held stock in either Pfizer or BioNTech. pic.twitter.com/nxZWZjBVoA
— Freedom Media (@WeAreTheMSM) May 3, 2022
Yup. Rats. 44 pregnant rats. More evidence that what’s under the hood may not always match the brochure of what they are trying to sell us.
The purpose of this article is not to provide medical advice of any kind. The only goal is to give our readers the information so that they can make their own informed decisions. Based on the data that is out there, the days of taking things at face value are long gone.