Adam Schiff knowingly took part in something which has now been proven to be 100% false…
He didn’t just take part in it, he had a central role in a conspiracy that makes Watergate look like a charitable action. The most disgusting thing is that at the time the mainstream media trumpeted his claims.
Then something interesting happened: Schiff’s FISA report was shown to be bogus, a complete scam.
Roughly 2 years later, it is accepted knowledge that Adam Schiff peddled blatant lies for political gain, and that the Democratic Party will end up paying for Russiagate.
John Durham’s investigation is in full swing, Sussmann’s trial is starting next month, and it won’t be too long before the evidence compels Hillary Clinton to make a court room appearance…
Before all of this happened though, investigative reporters and internet sleuths had to uncover and piece together the information which indicated a massive conspiracy on Schiff’s part:
Until yesterday's release, it was hard to 100% disprove Schiff's memo just from the FISA itself. You could rely on the 2019 IG report, but Schiff can claim he didn't know the IG's findings when he wrote his memo
Not true: Schiff knew he was lying at time, in Jan 2018
— Undercover Huber (@JohnWHuber) April 17, 2020
The latest declassification reveals *for the first time publicly* that Section II, p.10 said that:
"[Carter] Page…has been identified by source reporting as an intermediary with Russian leadership" in "a well-developed conspiracy of co-operation" to influence the 2016 election pic.twitter.com/xYDg4kew1R
— Undercover Huber (@JohnWHuber) April 17, 2020
The Gateway Pundit reminds us:
Horowitz found that FBI and DOJ officials did in fact omit critical material information from the FISA warrant, including several items exculpatory to Page.
Material facts were not just omitted but willfully hidden through doctoring of evidence.
That's a major problem for FBI/DOJ:
—FBI/DOJ submitted this FISA, which relies on Person 1 as a key source, on Oct 21 2016
—The FBI had opened a counterintelligence case on Person 1 for their alleged links to Russian intel *before* the FISA, likely between Oct 3-12 2016
— Undercover Huber (@JohnWHuber) April 17, 2020
Washington Examiner reports:
Horowitz said FBI interviews with Steele’s primary subsource “raised significant questions about the reliability of the Steele election reporting.”
The inspector general also said the main source’s account “contradicted the allegations of a well-developed conspiracy” in Steele’s dossier.
Declassified footnotes now show the FBI was aware that Steele’s dossier might have been compromised by Russian disinformation.
Join the conversation!
Please share your thoughts about this article below. We value your opinions, and would love to see you add to the discussion!