Now that the “paper of record” (the New York Times) has FINALLY confirmed what the rest of us have known for the last two years, the New York Post is having a field day.
You see, the New York Post is the news source that first published the truth about Hunter Biden’s laptop from hell.
But 51 members of the intelligence community wrote and signed a letter saying that the story was false.
They called it “Russian misinformation.”
And now, the New York Post is calling them out!
Look at the front page of the paper!
Spies who lie: The @nypost contacted the senior ex-intelligence officials who signed the shameful 2020 letter declaring Hunter Biden’s laptop and its emails we ran were Russian disinformation. Not one apologized. Most refused to comment. A few like James Clapper doubled down pic.twitter.com/EVYBXun02K
— Miranda Devine (@mirandadevine) March 19, 2022
It's unfortunate that the @NYPost is one of the few large US outlets willing to hold accountable the cretins in the US security state for the lies they told about the Biden emails being "Russian disinformation" – designed to manipulate the 2020 election – but that's our reality: https://t.co/u7ZXJlejMG
— Glenn Greenwald (@ggreenwald) March 19, 2022
Here’s the sad part:
Now that we know the truth…
Now that these officials were caught in the middle of a lie…
They are being confronted.
And hardly anyone is apologizing or retracting their statement!
Instead, they’re doubling down on their lies!
According to the New York Post, these are the 51 liars:
Do the officials who tried to flip the 2020 election feel any regret for their actions? The Post reached out to those who signed the letter. Most would not answer the question. A few doubled-down, including Clapper. No remorse. No shame. And no apologies:
Mike Hayden, former CIA director, now analyst for CNN: Didn’t respond.
Jim Clapper, former director of national intelligence, now CNN pundit: “Yes, I stand by the statement made AT THE TIME, and would call attention to its 5th paragraph. I think sounding such a cautionary note AT THE TIME was appropriate.”
Leon Panetta, former CIA director and defense secretary, now runs a public policy institute at California State University: Declined comment.
John Brennan, former CIA director, now analyst for NBC and MSNBC: Didn’t respond.
Thomas Fingar, former National Intelligence Council chair, now teaches at Stanford University: Didn’t respond.
Rick Ledgett, former National Security Agency deputy director, now a director at M&T Bank: Didn’t respond.
John McLaughlin, former CIA acting director, now teaches at Johns Hopkins University: Didn’t respond.
Michael Morell, former CIA acting director, now at George Mason University: Didn’t respond.
Mike Vickers, former defense undersecretary for intelligence, now on board of BAE Systems: Didn’t respond.
Doug Wise, former Defense Intelligence Agency deputy director, teaches at University of New Mexico: Didn’t respond.
Nick Rasmussen, former National Counterterrorism Center director, now executive director, Global Internet Forum to Counter Terrorism: Didn’t respond.
Russ Travers, former National Counterterrorism Center acting director: “The letter explicitly stated that we didn’t know if the emails were genuine, but that we were concerned about Russian disinformation efforts. I spent 25 years as a Soviet/Russian analyst. Given the context of what the Russians were doing at the time (and continue to do — Ukraine being just the latest example), I considered the cautionary warning to be prudent.”
Andy Liepman, former National Counterterrorism Center deputy director: “As far as I know I do [stand by the statement] but I’m kind of busy right now.”
John Moseman, former CIA chief of staff: Didn’t respond.
Larry Pfeiffer, former CIA chief of staff, now senior advisor to The Chertoff Group:
Jeremy Bash, former CIA chief of staff, now analyst for NBC and MSNBC: Didn’t respond.
Rodney Snyder, former CIA chief of staff: Didn’t respond.
Glenn Gerstell, former National Security Agency general counsel: Didn’t respond.
David Priess, former CIA analyst and manager: “Thank you for reaching out. I have no further comment at this time.”
Pam Purcilly, former CIA deputy director of analysis: Didn’t respond.
Marc Polymeropoulos, former CIA senior operations officer: Didn’t respond.
Chris Savos, former CIA senior operations officer: Didn’t respond.
John Tullius, former CIA senior intelligence officer: Didn’t respond.
David A. Vanell, former CIA senior operations officer: Didn’t respond.
Kristin Wood, former CIA senior intelligence officer, now non-resident fellow, Harvard: Didn’t respond.
David Buckley, former CIA inspector general: Didn’t respond.
Nada Bakos, former CIA analyst and targeting officer, now senior fellow, Foreign Policy Research Institute: Didn’t respond.
Patty Brandmaier, former CIA senior intelligence officer: Didn’t respond.
James B. Bruce, former CIA senior intelligence office: Didn’t respond.
David Cariens, former CIA intelligence analyst: Didn’t respond.
Janice Cariens, former CIA operational support officer: Didn’t respond.
Paul Kolbe, former CIA senior operations officer: Didn’t respond.
Peter Corsell, former CIA analyst: Didn’t respond.
Brett Davis, former CIA senior intelligence officer: Didn’t respond.
Roger Zane George, former national intelligence officer: Didn’t respond.
Steven L. Hall, former CIA senior intelligence officer: Didn’t respond.
Kent Harrington, former national intelligence officer: Didn’t respond.
Don Hepburn, former national security executive, now president of Boanerges Solutions LLC: “My position has not changed any. I believe the Russians made a huge effort to alter the course of the election . . . The Russians are masters of blending truth and fiction and making something feel incredibly real when it’s not. Nothing I have seen really changes my opinion. I can’t tell you what part is real and what part is fake, but the thesis still stands for me, that it was a media influence hit job.”
Timothy D. Kilbourn, former dean of CIA’s Kent School of Intelligence Analysis: Didn’t respond.
Ron Marks, former CIA officer: Didn’t respond.
Jonna Hiestand Mendez, former CIA technical operations officer, now on board of the International Spy Museum: “I don’t have any comment. I would need a little more information.”
Emile Nakhleh, former director of CIA’s Political Islam Strategic Analysis Program, now at University of New Mexico: “I have not seen any information since then that would alter the decision behind signing the letter. That’s all I can go into. The whole issue was highly politicized and I don’t want to deal with that. I still stand by that letter.”
Gerald A. O’Shea, former CIA senior operations officer: Didn’t respond.
Nick Shapiro, former CIA deputy chief of staff and senior adviser to the director: Didn’t respond.
John Sipher, former CIA senior operations officer: Declined to comment.
Stephen Slick, former National Security Council senior director for intelligence programs:
Cynthia Strand, former CIA deputy assistant director for global issues: Didn’t respond.
Greg Tarbell, former CIA deputy executive director: Didn’t respond.
David Terry, former National Intelligence Collection Board chairman: Couldn’t be reached.
Greg Treverton, former National Intelligence Council chair, now senior adviser at the Center for Strategic and International Studies: “I’ll pass. I haven’t followed the case recently.”
Winston Wiley, former CIA director of analysis: Couldn’t be reached.
I don’t know about you, but to me, this sounds like a coordinated cover up by the Deep State.
They did everything they could to make sure Donald Trump could be re-elected, so they plotted behind his back.
When Republicans retake the majorities this November, we need REAL hearings.
We don’t need sham hearings like the January 6th Commission.
Rather, we need hearings to look into why the Hunter Biden laptop from hell was hidden from the public.
Who knew, and when did they know it?!
The American people deserve to know!
Hunter Biden’s laptop was real.
The emails were real.
The eyewitness was real.
The only think fake? The news.
— Rep. Jim Jordan (@Jim_Jordan) March 18, 2022
Here are the names of the 50 intel officials who signed a letter saying Hunter Biden's laptop was "Russian disinformation." As @RichardGrenell has pointed out, none of these officials had a single piece of raw intel indicating it was disinformation. They made it up to help Biden. pic.twitter.com/l8rRXuDW1L
— Nick Short (@PoliticalShort) March 19, 2022
The next time the leftist media preach about "disinformation" remember these are the SAME people that brought us
– The Russia Hoax
– Hunter Biden's Laptop Is Disinformation
– Jussie Smollett Didn't Do It
– Nick Sandman Did It
– Cloth Masks Work
– Mostly Peaceful Protests
— Sean Spicer (@seanspicer) March 19, 2022
Lotta people are talking about the media covering up the Hunter Biden laptop story to get Joe elected.
Not enough people are talking about all the former heads of the CIA who did the same thing.
There is NOTHING more dangerous happening right now than the Administrative State.
— Jesse Kelly (@JesseKellyDC) March 19, 2022
But as we’ve always said, the truth always comes out in the end.
It might be a long grind to get there, but the truth prevails.
In fact, did you know that a federal probe into Hunter Biden is still ongoing?
Yes, the mainstream media might not want to talk about it, but the Hunter Biden probe is still active.
According to Newsmax:
A federal grand jury continued to examine evidence in a wide-ranging examination of Hunter Biden’s international business dealings even after President Joe Biden’s son paid off a significant tax liability, The New York Times reported.
A tax inquiry probe under the Obama administration widened in 2018 to include possible criminal violations of tax laws, as well as foreign lobbying and money laundering rules, sources told the Times.
The newspaper reported Wednesday that the federal grand jury, as recently as last month, heard testimony in Wilmington, Delaware, from two witnesses, one of whom was a former employee of Hunter Biden.
It was unclear whether the criminal probe was focused solely on Hunter Biden, or if he was among a group of individuals and companies being scrutinized, the Times said.
Sources told the newspaper that prosecutors have asked about potential Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA) violations by a Washington consulting firm, Blue Star Strategies, which worked for a Ukrainian energy company in an arrangement that Hunter Biden helped broker.
Hunter Biden confirmed in December 2020 — little more than a month after his father defeated then-President Donald Trump in the presidential election — that his taxes were under federal investigation.
Less than a week later, it was reported that a subpoena seeking documents from Hunter Biden asked for information related to more than two dozen entities, including Ukraine gas company Burisma.
Unfortunately, most people probably don’t know about this story.
Because the mainstream media has covered it up!
And don’t forget that social media giants such as Twitter blocked the New York Post temporarily from their platform for simply publishing the story!
It’s up to us to spread the word!
Please consider sharing this article with your family and friends.
It’s up to all of us to make sure that free speech and freedom of the press survive these dark days.