By now we know that January 6 was not an “insurrection.”
This is a narrative that was spun by the media.
But here’s the thing: apparently the media knew they were being dishonest.
The media knew that they were lying to the public and trying to make January 6th worse than it actually was.
Now, we have footage of a New York Times reporter caught on camera.
This reporter confirms that January 6 was full “of FBI informants.”
While he didn’t mention Ray Epps specifically, this appears to confirm that multiple FBI agents were involved.
Furthermore, the NYT reporter called it fake trauma and suggested that the controversy around January 6 is fake news!
Sound too good to be true?
Listen to the reporter in his own words!
Folks, this is not any New York Times reporter.
This isn’t some low level person.
This is a Pulitzer Prize Winning reporter.
He’s respected by his liberal colleagues as well as the rest of the mainstream media.
In other words, if someone this high profile on the left is saying this, then you know that their false narrative is falling apart!
According to the Daily Caller:
A national security correspondent for The New York Times said the media’s coverage of the Capitol Riot was “overblown” and that the events of Jan. 6, 2021 were “no big deal,” according to undercover video released Tuesday by Project Veritas.NYT correspondent Matthew Rosenberg and his colleagues have described the reported presence of FBI plants among the rioters outside of the U.S. Capitol a year earlier as a “reimagining” of the “attack.” But in the Project Veritas video, which appears to have been recorded without his knowledge, Rosenberg paints a different picture and claims that “there were a ton of FBI informants amongst the people who attacked the capitol.”“I know I’m supposed to be traumatized,” Rosenberg said in the video, “but like, all these colleagues who were in the (Capitol) building and are like, ‘Oh my God it was so scary!’ I’m like, ‘fuck off!’”In the video, Rosenberg described the day of the Capitol Riot as “fun,” although he previously reported that the event was “a violent interruption to the transition of power,” according to Project Veritas. “It was like, me and two other colleagues who were there outside and we were just having fun,” Rosenberg said.
Folks, we’ve always said that the truth would come out.
But what we didn’t expect was for the truth to come from mainstream media reporters!
“NYT National Security Correspondent, Matthew Rosenberg, contradicts his own January 6 reporting: “There were a ton of FBI informants amongst the people who attacked the Capitol.””https://t.co/vBe2pE2fBU
— Rasmussen Reports (@Rasmussen_Poll) March 9, 2022
“There were a ton of FBI informants amongst the people who attacked the Capitol.”
NYT national security reporter Matthew Rosenberg was caught in undercover video contradicting his own reporting. He also admits his colleagues exaggerated Jan. 6 dangers.https://t.co/rASt0aemBD
— Andy Ngô 🏳️🌈 (@MrAndyNgo) March 9, 2022
Many in the media are claiming that they are “traumatized” from January 6.
Nevermind the fact that NONE of these reporters were actually on the ground when January 6 happened.
They are just pretending to be traumatized so that they can bash President Trump and the rest of the conservative movement.
But this NYT reporter appears to bash his colleagues.
According to the Washington Examiner:
Project Veritas posted footage of a New York Times reporter alleging media coverage of Jan. 6 was excessive.
The conservative group published a video on Tuesday of New York Times National Security Correspondent Matthew Rosenberg alleging some of his colleagues overreacted to the events.
“All these colleagues who were in the building, and they’re young and are like, ‘Oh my God, it was so scary,'” Rosenberg said in a clip posted by Project Veritas. “I’m like, ‘F*** off.'” He later added that “[the Times is] not the kind place I can tell somebody to man up, but I kind of want to be like, ‘Jude, come on, like, you were not in any danger.'”
In a separate clip, Rosenberg listed several colleagues who were reportedly at the Capitol on Jan. 6, only to describe some of them as “f***ing b****es” due to their claims of being traumatized by the Jan. 6 events.
Rosenberg went on to say he wasn’t as in favor of his Jan. 6 reporting as it may appear. Rosenberg’s managing editor asked him, “Can we do like part two of that like, what’s going on a year since Jan. 6, kind of like memory-holing it,” the national security correspondent said in the video. “Like maybe ‘it’s no big deal.’ Yeah. We can do that. It’s a little quick turnaround. So, that’s what we’ve been doing the last few days.”
Rosenberg added he believes the Left overreacted as much as some on the Right underreacted to Jan. 6.
So what do you think?
Is Rosenburg right?
Will more reporters in the mainstream media begin to speak out and tell the truth about January 6th?
How will this end?
Let us know your thoughts and predictions in the comments section below!