Federal Judge Scolds Prosecutors Who Pushed False Kamala Harris January 6th Narrative

It’s nice to see a federal judge come out against the rampant prosecutorial misconduct in this country.

We saw some of the most egregious misconduct during the Kyle Rittenhouse case, but Rittenhouse’s story is far from being unique in any way—there is a pattern to this behavior.

The latest reports highlight a federal judge issuing a sharp rebuke of prosecutors who falsely claimed that Kamala Harris was in the Capitol on January 6th.

With this behavior becoming all too common in our political and legal systems, how can we continue to trust anything that these people say or do?

Does the rule of law even matter when they are so brazenly and rampantly undermining it systematically?

Can we continue to call ourselves ‘a nation of laws’ if the law and justice itself is increasingly trampled over to fulfill notions of ‘progressivism’ and ‘liberalism’?

Our biggest problem as a nation right now is that there is a group of people in this country who believe that the ends justify the means.

They think that lying, falsely prosecuting people, and spreading their false narratives is ok so long as it fulfills an agenda that purportedly stands for equity, welfare, democracy, and health—yet none of those things are ever achieved…

Even if these people could accomplish what they purportedly set out to do, it still doesn’t alleviate the fact that the road to hell is paved with great intentions.

Here’s more on the story:

So @TheJusticeDept is fessing up that @VP elect WASN'T st the Capitol on January 6 but at @DNC where coincidentally one Pope bomb was found. The idea that taxpayers aren't allowed in the Capitol is weak. Civilians are allowed at the Capitol & @WhiteHouse as we pay for them!

— Thankful4USA (@Thankful4Usa) February 10, 2022

Biden’s DOJ for months has lied in charging documents and presumably to a grand jury to support its most prevalent misdemeanor charges related to J6 probe.

DOJ repeatedly said Kamala Harris was in the Capitol during the “attack.”

But she wasn’t… https://t.co/KzCgLB4cqo

— Julie Kelly 🇺🇸 (@julie_kelly2) January 25, 2022

According to The Epoch Times:

The government claiming Harris was in the building despite previously admitting she was not “suggests a certain lack of attention and care in the prosecution of this case, undermining any confidence the Court can have in the Government’s representations,” U.S. District Judge Trevor McFadden, a Trump nominee, wrote in an order.

JUST IN: Judge Trevor McFadden dings DOJ for failing to correct charges against #CapitolRiot defendant Nicholas Rodean to remove false claim that VP Harris was in Capitol when it was stormed. Doc: https://t.co/mWurZDC85w Earlier: https://t.co/CvtUZ0Roaf

— Josh Gerstein (@joshgerstein) February 10, 2022

Left-wing Politico had this to say:

Although the mistake may have limited legal significance, it’s an indication that even some fundamental facts about the insurrection remain murky — such as, where was the vice president-elect and why did she leave the Capitol?

Harris is one of the two Secret Service protectees who was in the building that day. Pence was the other. Many of the 650-plus defendants arrested for breaching the Capitol are facing charges that they illegally entered a “restricted” area where someone under Secret Service protection was visiting.