It happened again folks.
Joe Biden posting videos and messages from an obviously FAKE White House set.
We’ve covered this before here:
And here:
Biden Mocked for Using Fake White House Set with Digital Windows, Rose Garden
But it just happened again and it's getting REALLY weird.
This all begs the simple question: if you have access to the REAL White House, why do you need to create a Fake set somewhere else?
But let's back up a minute and address the so-called "Fact Checkers".
Or as I like to call them, the Ministry of Propaganda.
Because they don't truly "fact check" jack shit.
Their sole job is to try and sway a story and confuse the public from what is obvious truth.
Exhibit A?
We'll let's go right to a "Fact Check" on the whole Fake White House story from back in October when this first broke.
Back in October, WeLoveTrump was one of the first in the Media to jump on the story of the Fake White House set.
Before it was common news, we posted here at WeLoveTrump that the window behind Joe Biden looked very odd...almost cartoonish in coloration.
Very shortly after that post it was being widely reported that it was indeed a Fake Set of the White House.
In fact, here is one of the photos which was a total BOMBSHELL when it was first released. It very clearly shows the Fake Set:
Nothing is real with these people, it’s all smoke and mirrors. But we’re supposed to entrust them with all of our personal health decisions? pic.twitter.com/9N5FPYm7pI
— Charlie Kirk (@charliekirk11) September 29, 2021
And this:
If you go to Facebook to this very day, this is what you see when you load that photo.
"MISSING CONTEXT".
Hilarious folks....
It's a picture and we can all determine the context with our own two eyes!
But the Ministry of Propaganda has to TELL YOU what you can think...
They have to TELL YOU what your eyes are seeing...
So sad.
Here's another one:
Oh what do you know...more "Missing Context".
Friends, let me key you in on a little truth...
I'll translate this for you from Facebook-speak to Plain-English Truth.
Ready?
Missing Context = this is actually 100% true and even we can't BS enough to label it false so we're going to find some minor detail or idea we make up and claim that due to something that has 0.01% impact on the story it is "Missing Context".
Hope that helps.
But it's not just FakeBook and their propaganda...
Let's now go to Reuters who published this "fact check" back in October:
Any rational human-being reading that report would conclude it must be fake news!
See (says Normie Poindexter)....See! I told you it was fake news that Biden was on a fake White House set!
Except....keep reading.
Let's just skip down to the END of the article where they admit (1) he WAS in fact on a film set, and (2) it wasn't in the White House at all, it was in the Eisenhower Building!
Look:
Compare that first section with the last section...
Even within their own article they are caught lying!
And yet these bastards hold themselves out as Fact-Checkers.
GIVE ME A BREAK!
I've had massive dumps in a toilet that hold more truth that your garbage fact checks.
But I digress...
Let's get back to the story and advance the ball because the Fake Set was just used again!
Here is the new photo released by the White House which they claim is a photo of his call with Ukrainian President Zelensky:
I spoke with Ukrainian President Zelenskyy to discuss our coordinated diplomatic efforts and reaffirm our support for Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity. We will respond decisively — along with our Allies and partners — if Russia further invades Ukraine. pic.twitter.com/hRaUIxyxCd
— President Biden (@POTUS) January 28, 2022
Yes, note that is the official Twitter account.
Notice anything weird?
It's those weird cartoonish colorized windows again!
And what do we see outside them?
TREES WITH LEAVES!
Of course, I don't need to tell you that it's winter in D.C. and no trees have green leaves on them right now.
But just in case, here are two photos from live feeds of the White House taken today and yesterday:
Right, no leaves.
Winter time.
Why in the world would you need to build a FAKE OVAL OFFICE set?
The obvious answer is because you don't have access to the genuine article.
Make of that what you will.
Follow up question: why do they KEEP doing it?
My theory is when they did it the first time, they never thought they would get caught.
We were one of the first to notice and start asking questions, so we take pride in being on the front end of this story.
After they were caught, I think they had two choices:Â (1) lie about it and claim it didn't happen, or (2) embrace it and keep doing it and pretend like it was intentional.
They clearly went with Choice #2.
Even Newsweek was brought in to carry water for the second option.
Check out this load of propaganda they published trying to explain why they just HAD to create a Fake Oval Office:
Why was a fake Oval Office built?
The event space is being used for White House events that are being broadcast. The area is bigger than the actual Oval Office, and provides an area for journalists.
Martha Kumar, director of the White House Transition Project explained that this room in the Eisenhower Executive Office Building is being used more regularly due to it being more accessible.
Previously, the room known as Room 450 was used for such media events.
"You have to slug your way up flights of stairs because the small elevators would hold only a limited number of people," Kimar explained to the Washington Examiner.
"That means you often had to walk. White House staff, as well as presidents, would have to make their way there, too, though they had the luxury of an elevator. With its easy access, the South Court site was welcomed by all."
While former White House events director Josh King explained that the use of the new area is down to "PoliOptics."
"Every week in Washington has an element of theater and stagecraft, one side or another working to take full advantage of visual storytelling," King told the newspaper.
"Presidents can fly on Air Force One across the country—or even around the world—for a photo worthy to print on the top of the fold of U.S. newspapers."
King said that the South Court Auditorium is usually a "generic, stadium-style meeting room with four or five rows of seats; space in the back of the room for cameras sitting on tripods; a small buffer area in front of the stage for still photographers to capture the key moment; and handy backstage doors for easy ingress and egress by the principals."
LOL, ok thanks Newsweek.
Got it...they just had to create a Fake Set because the other one had too many stairs!
How long did it take to come up with that line of BS and how many people sat around a table spitballing ideas until you decided that was the best one to run with?
Maybe I'm being too tough.
Maybe it's true!
I'll turn it over to you....what do YOU think?
Join the conversation!
Please share your thoughts about this article below. We value your opinions, and would love to see you add to the discussion!