Skip to main content
WeLoveTrump.com may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on the site. Read our full Disclosure here.

INCONVENIENT TRUTH: India Proves 100% Ivermectin Works!


9,917 views

The wheels continue to fall off from the censorship campaign against ivermectin. 

Why is this an “inconvenient truth”?

It’s inconvenient for the “powers that should not be”.

So far, the best real-world example of ivermectin thwarting COVID-19 is the Indian state of Uttar Pradesh

With roughly two-thirds of the population size of America, Uttar Pradesh provided a large sample to analyze the widespread impact of ivermectin. 

The state has utilized the Nobel Prize-winning drug for prophylaxis and early treatment of COVID-19 with tremendous success. 

Yet, many people refuse to believe the evidence and listen to the lies perpetuated by mainstream media. 

Public health officials at the FDA and CDC scream there’s zero scientific evidence ivermectin is effective against COVID-19. 

Although their statements are false, another study has debunked their claims. 

The latest article was published on January 15, 2022, and analyzed a citywide, population-scale observational study for ivermectin as prophylaxis against COVID-19.

The study consisted of 223,128 subjects from Itajaí, a southern city in Brazil in the state of Santa Catarina.

“The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of regular ivermectin use on subsequent COVID-19 infection and mortality rates.”

Here’s what the researchers found in the peer-reviewed study:

As stated on Cureus:

Abstract

Background: Ivermectin has demonstrated different mechanisms of action that potentially protect from both coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection and COVID-19-related comorbidities. Based on the studies suggesting efficacy in prophylaxis combined with the known safety profile of ivermectin, a citywide prevention program using ivermectin for COVID-19 was implemented in Itajaí, a southern city in Brazil in the state of Santa Catarina. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of regular ivermectin use on subsequent COVID-19 infection and mortality rates.

Materials and methods: We analyzed data from a prospective, observational study of the citywide COVID-19 prevention with ivermectin program, which was conducted between July 2020 and December 2020 in Itajaí, Brazil. Study design, institutional review board approval, and analysis of registry data occurred after completion of the program. The program consisted of inviting the entire population of Itajaí to a medical visit to enroll in the program and to compile baseline, personal, demographic, and medical information. In the absence of contraindications, ivermectin was offered as an optional treatment to be taken for two consecutive days every 15 days at a dose of 0.2 mg/kg/day. In cases where a participating citizen of Itajaí became ill with COVID-19, they were recommended not to use ivermectin or any other medication in early outpatient treatment. Clinical outcomes of infection, hospitalization, and death were automatically reported and entered into the registry in real time. Study analysis consisted of comparing ivermectin users with non-users using cohorts of infected patients propensity score-matched by age, sex, and comorbidities. COVID-19 infection and mortality rates were analyzed with and without the use of propensity score matching (PSM).

Results: Of the 223,128 citizens of Itajaí considered for the study, a total of 159,561 subjects were included in the analysis: 113,845 (71.3%) regular ivermectin users and 45,716 (23.3%) non-users. Of these, 4,311 ivermectin users were infected, among which 4,197 were from the city of Itajaí (3.7% infection rate), and 3,034 non-users (from Itajaí) were infected (6.6% infection rate), with a 44% reduction in COVID-19 infection rate (risk ratio [RR], 0.56; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.53-0.58; p < 0.0001). Using PSM, two cohorts of 3,034 subjects suffering from COVID-19 infection were compared. The regular use of ivermectin led to a 68% reduction in COVID-19 mortality (25 [0.8%] versus 79 [2.6%] among ivermectin non-users; RR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.20-0.49; p < 0.0001). When adjusted for residual variables, reduction in mortality rate was 70% (RR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.19-0.46; p < 0.0001). There was a 56% reduction in hospitalization rate (44 versus 99 hospitalizations among ivermectin users and non-users, respectively; RR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.31-0.63; p < 0.0001). After adjustment for residual variables, reduction in hospitalization rate was 67% (RR, 0.33; 95% CI, 023-0.66; p < 0.0001).

Conclusion: In this large PSM study, regular use of ivermectin as a prophylactic agent was associated with significantly reduced COVID-19 infection, hospitalization, and mortality rates.

Underlying-data-for-the-study-on-ivermectin-prophylaxis-used-for-COVID-19.

*Source*

Summary-of-the-findings.

*Source*

Cont. from Cureus:

Discussion

This prospective, citywide COVID-19 ivermectin prophylaxis program resulted in significant reductions in COVID-19 infections, hospitalizations, and deaths. The ivermectin non-users were two times more likely to die of COVID-19 than ivermectin users in the overall population analysis. Since groups were compared for the exposure during the same period, in a parallel manner, changes in transmission rates would affect ivermectin users and non-users equally.

The city of Itajaí, in the state of Santa Catarina, Brazil, started a citywide program of prophylaxis with ivermectin in July 2020 as part of several initiatives to reduce the burden of COVID-19. The use of ivermectin was based on the existing literature at that time and on the virtual absence of risks. The National Health System (SUS) functions as full healthcare support to the entire population allowed the city to establish a non-restricted population program. This program included a support structure consisting of a large outpatient clinic located at the Convention Center of Itajaí. This outpatient clinic became the main locale of assistance for COVID-19 patients, supported by multiple public facilities where general practitioners regularly saw patients.

The use of ivermectin was optional unless contraindicated and given upon medical discretion. A structured medical-based program with a medical visit and evaluation of basic demographic characteristics and comorbidities offered ivermectin as optional prophylaxis to those who agreed to participate in this preventive treatment program. Health status was assessed and data were entered prospectively throughout the period of the program, in a fully digitized system provided by the National Health System (SUS). Since the system existed prior to the pandemic, a significant number of the population were already registered with their health information, including past and current diseases, use of medications, and other characteristics. The adaptations made to the SUS for the pandemic preparedness, prior to the initiation of this ivermectin outpatient program, allowed a structured, well-organized collection of the data that monitored any missing values, reinforcing the reliability of the results.

An important conservative bias was present. Major risk factors for severe COVID-19 and mortality due to COVID-19, including aging, diabetes, and hypertension, were more present among ivermectin users, which may have underestimated the benefits of ivermectin as it was demonstrated to be particularly effective in subjects above 49 years old in terms of reduction of absolute risk, which corresponds to the group at the highest risk for COVID-19. This allows the understanding that prophylactic use of ivermectin can be particularly impactful in older subjects. In addition, ivermectin seemed to reduce the exceeding risk of hypertension, T2D, and other diseases.

In accordance with the literature, subjects with higher age, diabetes, and males were less likely to survive (p < 0.05 for all), and only aging remained as an independent risk factor after PSM (p < 0.0001). However, prophylactic ivermectin use appears to mitigate the additional risk of COVID-19 death due to T2D, hypertension, and cardiovascular diseases.

The narrative that using preventive and early treatment therapies will have people relax their caution of remaining socially and physically distanced to allow more COVID-19-related infections is not supported here. These study data demonstrate that the use of preventive ivermectin significantly lowers the infection rate and that benefits outweigh the speculated increased risk of changes in social behaviors. Hence, we can speculate that the prophylactic use of ivermectin could play an important role in the reduction of the pandemic burden.

Want more information about Ivermectin?

Check this out…

Time for a reality check!

Truth check!

That’s what we do here at WeLoveTrump on all topics, and today’s topic is the REAL news about Ivermectin….

Real, unfiltered news with no bias.

Just the facts, ma’am!

Like this one for example:

Two Separate Doctors Claim OVER 100 Members of Congress Treated With Ivermectin!

Anyone else mad yet?

And today I have a new video to show you.

Someone sent this to me really explaining what Ivermectin is, it’s history and so much more.

They don’t want you to see this which is exactly why I’m sharing it with you.

Watch it here on Rumble:

Remember this disclaimer:

I am not a doctor.  I am not giving you medical advice.  I’m not saying any one thing will treat or cure COVID.  We clear?

I’m a REPORTER.  I research and I report and I give you the full story open and honestly so YOU can decide.  Consult your doctor before taking any vitamin, supplement or medicine.  

Now let’s go to another video.

This woman below documented her own journey with Ivermectin on video.

She starts off looking not so good but makes a swift turnaround in just a few days.

This is not me talking, listen to her share and document her own story….

Here is the video from Rumble:

Now let’s talk about the MSM disinformation campaign, which is a nice way of saying “outright lies and propaganda”.

Look, I will give you one disclaimer before we get started:  I am a journalist and not anyone with any medical expertise.  I’m not a doctor and I’m not giving medical advice.  

I’m just presenting you with the results of my research that the MSM really seems to want to hide….

And I know how to do my research.

So let’s start with this:

Now let’s unpack all the lies the MSM has been telling you about Ivermectin.

You would assume based on all the MSM propaganda that Ivermectin is only approved for Horses and not Humans.

The only problem with that?

It’s not true.

Not even close.

Here’s the real truth:

Yes folks, that is a statement taken from PolitiFact’s very own fact-checking page about Ivermectin.

But what they do with their “Face Check” is so insidious….

Here’s how PolitiFact tries to claim that the TRUE statement is still somehow false, watch these mental gymnastics:

This post was flagged as part of Facebook’s efforts to combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed. (Read more about our partnership with Facebook.)

It is true that ivermectin was approved by the Food and Drug Administration that year — but not to treat the coronavirus. The drug was approved for strongyloidiasis, a disease caused by a roundworm, and onchocerciasis, or river blindness, which is caused by a parasitic worm.

The drug was approved for humans under the brand name Stromectol, National Geographic reported, and since then it’s been recognized as a safe treatment for several tropical diseases caused by parasites. In 2015, two scientists even won a Nobel Prize for their discovery of ivermectin and its use to treat diseases caused by parasites.

But unlike, say, river blindness, COVID-19 is caused by a coronavirus, not by parasites. And as PolitiFact recently reported in a story exploring ivermectin, there’s no conclusive evidence that ivermectin is effective against COVID-19.

The lying and the deception is just so evil, really makes me angry.

If you gave me a full year, I couldn’t come up with all the twists and turns these people take to turn the TRUTH into a lie.

It’s sickening.

But we’re just getting started.

Next come the scare tactics and VERY misleading headlines.

Like this article from WIVB Channel 4 News:

After a recent resurgence in several states, health officials are warning residents to be aware of a dangerous of an unauthorized “treatment” for COVID-19 — often being taken with dangerous consequences.

It’s called ivermectin and it’s used to treat and prevent parasites in animals, the Food and Drug Administration explains. The tablets are not FDA approved for treatment of COVID-19 in humans and isn’t even an anti-viral drug — meaning it has no impact on the coronavirus. And because the large-concentration tablets are intended for large animals, these can be treacherous for humans.

In addition to not being authorized for treatment, there’s no evidence ivermectin treats COVID-19.

“There’s a lot of misinformation around, and you may have heard that it’s okay to take large doses of ivermectin. That is wrong.”

FDA
The FDA and several state officials say they’ve seen an uptick in calamitous use of the drugs, particularly tablets used to treat parasitic worms in horses. While ivermectin is approved for humans to treat certain skin conditions (rosacea) and certain external parasites like head lice, the FDA warns this ivermectin is different than the one used in animals.

On Friday, the Mississippi Department of Health was forced to send out a warning to residents about the dangers of the drug after several poisonings.

The Mississippi Poison Control Center said at least 70% of recent ivermectin-related calls are tied to people taking livestock or animal formulations they bought a livestock supply stores or through online markets.

Eighty-five percent of callers had mild symptoms — these include rash, nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain — but one person needed evaluation because of how much they’d taken.

More severe dangers of ivermectin ingestion include neurologic disorders, seizures, coma and death.

Use of ivermectin should only be taken if prescribed by a doctor for an FDA-approved use. Regardless of the usage and prescription, the FDA warns ivermectin overdose is still possible. Possible interaction with other medications is also a possibility.

I highlighted the key parts.

A 70% SURGE in Ivermectin Poison Center calls sounds like a lot doesn’t it?

NPR even reports a 245% surge!  Oh my!

Sounds bad until you realize according to NPR that the 245% surge is going from 133 calls to 459 calls….NATIONWIDE!

According to the National Poison Data System (NPDS), which collects information from the nation’s 55 poison control centers, there was a 245% jump in reported exposure cases from July to August — from 133 to 459.

Yes folks, out of 333 MILLION people, there were 459 calls to poison centers.

So 0.00000137% of the population.

And those are just calls.

According to the bold part of the Channel 4 article, 85% of those people who called or had symptoms had MILD symptoms like a rash.

The horror!

According to the article, only ONE person needed a further evaluation.

But is this what you hear in the MSM?

No.

If you listed only to the MSM fear-porn, you’d think we had a crisis of Ivermectin deaths.

The truth is the polar opposite.

Anyone else REALLY tired of being lied to?

It’s why I’m here.

I will continue to shout the truth from the rooftops!

But I’m not done yet.

Did you know that Ivermectin has actually been listed even by the corrupt WHO as one of the most “essential medicines” out there?

It’s true, you can read it right here until they take it down.

But I’m not done yet!

Let’s cut right to the chase and go to a medical journal to see the true toxicity data on Ivermectin in humans.

Seems like something JOURNALISTS should do, don’t you think?

Let’s go to INCHEM.org, the WHO’s own website for “Internationally Peer Reviewed Chemical Safety Information”.

They lay it out in black and white and even a non-medical person like me can understand it.

Now let’s go down to Section 7.2 of their report which is about Toxicity in Humans:

I’m going to bold the key part:

  7.2 Toxicity
       7.2.1 Human data
             7.2.1.1 Adults
                     Amounts approaching the therapeutic doses in 
                     animals (100 to 200 ðg/kg bodyweight) are not 
                     hazardous to humans.  Ingestions of large 
                     quantities (10 to 100 times the animal 
                     therapeutic dosage) may produce symptoms 
                     resembling those observed in animal toxicology 
                     studies at high toxic levels.
                     
                     An adult female accidentally self-injected a 
                     small quantity (approximately 200 ðg/kg) 
                     subcutaneously.  Twelve hours later she 
                     experienced colicky pain with nausea but 
                     recovered within 12 hours (MSD, 1988).
                     
                     Clinical studies of oral ivermectin given in 
                     doses from 2 to 200 ðg/kg (maximum 12 mg) have 
                     shown a pattern of adverse experiences that 
                     included only one serious event (transient 
                     stupor).  The remaining adverse experiences were 
                     considered not serious and were chiefly of the 
                     type expected based on the characteristics of 
                     the underlying disease and the responses seen 
                     after treatment with other microfilaricidal 
                     drugs, except for reports of "depression" (not 
                     psychiatrically tested) in four patients in open 
                     studies (MSD, 1988).
             7.2.1.2 Children
                     A 16-month-old boy weighing 15 kg ingested 
                     approximately 100 to 130 mg of ivermectin (as an 
                     injectable solution).  Ten hours post-ingestion 
                     he had mydriasis in one pupil, with frequent 
                     vomiting, pallor, 35°C temperature, tachycardia, 
                     somnolence and variable blood pressure.  He 
                     developed urticaria the following day, and had 
                     recovered after three days (MSD, 1988).

Let’s start with the very first line: even if you take the ANIMAL dosage, it is “not hazardous to humans”.

Case closed folks.

Seriously, why is this not front page news?

Is it because Ivermectin WORKS and actually treats COVID-19 and they can’t let that happen?

Just asking.

How soon will it be do you think before they take down the WHO website or “edit” it?

Good thing I took screenshots!

Ok, now to address the question everyone is asking: how can I get it?

Here is a new update from the FLCCC, which stands for Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance.

From their page “Prevention and Treatment Protocols” I give you the following:

I also highlight their disclaimer:

And then you can TAP HERE to get the full list of doctors who can assist you.

And if that doesn’t work, I have a second source.

Let’s go to America’s Frontline Doctors, who as their name suggests, are on the frontline of this battle.

They took an oath to heal their patients and they believe many of the things the MSM wants to scare you away from may actually help heal you.

Not my words, theirs…..take a look:

From their website:

Tap here to go to their site.


And here is even more, also from America’s Frontline Doctors…..

Here is a graphic that has been circulating:

And now let’s go right to their website….

Here is what they’re calling their Wellness Protocol and it sure seems very normal and common sense to me, how about you?

Then we have their Treatment Options, which again look very reasonable.

Folks, I’m not going to tell you what to do or not do, you have to make up your own mind and consult with your own doctor.

But as a non-medical person, doesn’t this stuff sound like a good idea?

And here it is in a diagram:

I will reiterate here once again what they posted on their website:

THIS IS NOT MEDICAL ADVICE. Every situation is unique and every person must check with his or her own physician, especially if you are taking any other medication.

Good advice.  For everyone.

If you are interested in where to buy some of these items, scroll down and I have links for you to some of the best ones.

Want even more?

Then you need to hear from my friend Chris Burres who joined me last weekend on my show to talk about the power of C60.

No, he’s not saying it treats COVID or cures COVID.

But he is saying it appears to supercharge your immune system and help your body in many different ways…..anyone else interested in that?

Me too, and that’s why I had him on my show.

I had a lot of questions for him about C60 and I found the whole thing fascinating!

Yes, I (Noah) personally take C60 and I’ve been taking it for over a year now.

I first started hearing about it online about a year ago and I did my own research on it to find out what it is, where can I get it, and is it really that good….?

First, let me give you my disclaimer once again in bold font: I’m not a doctor and I’m not giving you medical advice.  I’m not telling you this is going to treat or cure any condition you have.  I’m just telling you what I have personally experienced. 

So here’s what I found.

I found that C60 is a powerful antioxidant often described as the “perfect carbon molecule”.

It’s an antioxidant that has been measured to be 172x more powerful than Vitamin C!  How about that?

Not only is it an antioxidant, but it’s an anti-viral and an anti-bacterial and an anti-inflammatory.

I’ll tell you this….ever since I saw the Deep State going after Carbon and trying to tax carbon emissions with their Al-Gore Carbon Tax, I immediately knew one thing:  I bet Carbon is actually pretty good for you!

Turns out I was right.

Especially the Carbon-60 “perfect carbon molecule.”

So once I learned more about it, I then set out to find where to buy it from the most reputable company.

I found there are a lot of companies selling C60 that might actually be bad for you and toxic, so I found the one that has the highest standards and safest, most continually-tested product out there….and that was C60 Evo.

I’ve been personally taking C60 for over a year and feel amazing so in light of all the health issues plaguing our nation right now, I decided I’d have one of the founders of the company on my show to break all this down.

Chris Burres was kind enough to speak with me today (on a weekend) and I thought it was a WONDERFUL discussion!

I learned a lot myself….

He explains what C60 is, why its discovery won a Nobel prize, and the benefits many people experience when taking it.

I believe in this product so much after using it for a year I asked the company if I could actually become an affiliate and get all of you a discount….

And they agreed!

So watch the video below and then scroll down to grab my code which will get you 10% if you want to try it.

Watch here on Rumble:

To visit their website go to 👉 https://www.c60evo.com/welovetrump/

Use promo code EVNOAH to save 10%.

Backup here on YouTube:

To visit their website go to 👉 https://www.c60evo.com/welovetrump/

Use promo code EVNOAH to save 10%.

Want even more on an immune-boosting health plan?

Look no further than my friend Clif High.

Clif has routinely promoted C60 in the past and here is even more of what he recommends.

Take a look:

If that Tweet gets taken down, here is a screenshot of what he posted:

I’m going to give you my disclaimer once again…..

DISCLAIMER: I’m not a doctor and I don’t practice medicine.

And neither is Clif!

Neither of us is giving you medical advice.

Ok?

Ok.

I’m just reporting on what others have said.

But let’s be honest….I think I can probably do better than the “doctors” like Dr. Fraudci, Dr. Birxx who lie to you and serve you up a big heaping pile of propaganda!

You can probably take whatever they tell you to do and just do the opposite and you’d probably be pretty close to an ideal course of action!

So no, I’m not a doctor, but if being a doctor puts you in the same class as Dr. FRAUDci, then I take not being a doctor as a badge of honor.

I’m a reporter.

I simply report what I hear and see from others.

To paraphrase a once great network: I report, you decide!

But what I can report is that it sure looks like some very basic stuff can drastically help you recover and protect your body going forward!

Vitamin C, Vitamin D, Chaga Mushroom Tea, C60, and of course hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin may be highly effective!

If you scroll down, I have links for you.

And let’s consider the worst case scenario…..taking more vitamins is almost never a bad thing, right?

Your body needs them regardless of what virus is floating around out there.

As long as you don’t take too much of the fat-soluble vitamins, it’s almost NEVER a bad thing to give your body more vitamins.

Now let me give you a little more background on Clif and why he’s making these recommendations….

Watch this video where Clif High explains what the spike protein is actually doing to your body, why it is definitely a bio-weapon, and how each of the items listed above can help:

Here is one more where he goes into even more detail and in this one he talks about the power of C60 and why you need to get some!

Ever since you were a kid, you were told to get your vitamins!

It’s basic advice that was good then and is still good now!

You need large doses of the right kind of Vitamin C, 10-15,000 IU’s of Vitamin D to maintain certain blood levels, and then Clif recommends C60 too.

Watch the interview here from Rumble (they discuss it in the first 10 minutes) and then scroll down for links to where you can get the best of each item:

If you want to follow Clif’s advice, here are some links to the products I like to use.

Unfortunately, I can’t give you a link to NAC on Amazon because Amazon banned it.

One of the oldest and most trusted supplements in the bodybuilding industry and Amazon suddenly banned it right now.

Interesting.

So we go with the rest of the list….

First is Glutathione:

You want to get “Liposomal” Vitamin C, very important.

And in case that sells out, which tends to happen, this is another good Liposomal Vitamin C:

Now on to Vitamin D.

Here is my current favorite and the one I personally take:

And a backup Vitamin D3:

And Chaga Mushroom Tea:

And here is the Zinc Balance:

And we end with C60.

As I mentioned above, I’ve been personally taking C60 for over a year and I have not came down with COVID.  Not saying it treats or prevents COVID, I’m just saying my experience.

Regardless of COVID, I love taking it and have noticed multiple benefits.

Here’s what many people have reported:

C60 is a powerful antioxidant (172x the power of Vitamin C), antiviral, antibacterial and anti-inflammatory.  

I liked it so much I actually contacted the company and got everyone who is reading this a deal.

The company is called C60Evo.

Go to their website here and then be sure to use promo code EVNOAH and you’ll get 10% off your order!

I love this stuff and I think you will too.

Cheers to good health and a big thank you to Clif High for putting out this information!

No, I’m not promising you won’t get COVID, but I am saying that TAKING YOUR VITAMINS and powerful ANTIOXIDANTS is a good idea!

Be smart.

Be safe.

Be healthy!



 

Join the conversation!

Please share your thoughts about this article below. We value your opinions, and would love to see you add to the discussion!

Thanks for sharing!