Skip to main content
We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here.

Democrat Whistleblower Steps Forward: 35,000 “Fake Mail-In Ballots” in Pima County Alone; Letter Sent to DOJ


It was only a matter of time.

If there was truly election fraud in 2020, then there are people who know about it.

And it appears that one of them has stepped forward.

This whistleblower is not a Republican.

It is not a Trump supporter.

This whistleblower is a Democrat.

Is it possible that this whistleblower simply wants media attention and fame?

It’s highly unlikely.


Because instead of going to the media, this whistleblower contacted the Department of Justice directly.

There’s only one problem: under Joe Biden, the DOJ is not investigating this claim at all.

This Democrat whistleblower claims to have inside knowledge that 35,000 mail-in ballots for Joe Biden were forged and counted in Pima County alone!

Mark Fincham read the letter live during a Pima County Arizona Election Integrity hearing:

You can read the text of the letter, which has now been made public, below:

“Please be advised the Pima County Recorder, located at 240 N. Stone Avenue in Tucson, Arizona, 85701 in Pima County, Arizona, and the Democrat Party added fraud votes. In the initial count of the vote by mail (VBM) totals released at 8 pm on November 3, 2020, There are approximately 35,000 fraud votes added to each Democrat candidates’ vote totals. Candidates impacted include County, State, and Federal Election candidates. Through the utilization of the automated ballot count machines in Pima County Elections, My understanding is that 35,000 was embedded into each Democrat candidates’ total votes. Below are the meeting notes.”

“In a meeting I was invited to by the Democrat party in Pima County, Arizona on September 10, 2020, no phones or recording devices were allowed. A presentation was given including detailed plans to embed 35,000 votes in a spread configured distribution to each Democrat candidate’s vote totals.”

“When I asked, “How in the world would 35,000 votes be kept hidden, or from being discovered?” It was stated that spread distribution will be embedded across the total registered vote range and will not exceed the registered voter count. And the 35,000 was determined allowable for Pima County based on our county registered voter count.”

“It was also stated total voter turnout versus total registered voters determined how many votes we can embed. The embedding will also adjust based on voter turnout. Because the embedded votes are distributed sporadically, all embedded votes will not be found if audited because embeds are in groups of approximately 1,000. This is so the County Recorder can declare an oversight issue or error, as a group of 1,000 is a normal and acceptable error.”

“Maricopa County’s embed totals will be substantially larger than Pima, due to embeds being calculated based on the total number of registered voters. When I asked, “Has this ever been tested, and how do we know it works?” the response was, yes, this has been tested and has shown significant success in Arizona judicial retention elections, since 2014. Even undetectable in post audits because no candidate will spend the kind of funds needed to audit and contact voters to verify votes and the full potential of the total registered voters, which is more than 500,000 registered voters. This year our Secretary of State has removed precinct level detail from election night releases, so candidates can’t see precinct over-votes.”

“This is what I have from this meeting. Just thought I’d report this. Not sure if you can do anything since I was unable to have a recording device at this meeting. Thank You.”

Despite this letter from a whistleblower, the DOJ is not investigating the claim.

You would think they would at least investigate to “debunk” it, but the DOJ isn’t even doing that.

The claim was dead-on-arrival.

Fortunately, a hearing in Pima County exposed many discrepancies.

American Greatness has more details of regarding the identity of the whistlewblower:

He also said that his team was able to verify that the IP address of the computer that sent the email is in Tucson, Arizona, but unfortunately, they wee not able to verify the identity of the whistleblower. Joe Biden’s DOJ reportedly refuses to investigate the allegations.

During the hearing, election experts described other potential election shenanigans in Pima County.

For instance, in the small town of Sells, Arizona, 1,375 residents were determined to be of “voting age.” However, 2,762 people were registered to vote in the town – more than double the voting age population.

The same thing happened in Topawa, another small town in Pima County, where 182 people were considered to be of “voting age” in the town of roughly 400 residents. Somehow, 288 people were reported as registered voters.

Pima County election canvassers also discovered that out of 172 homes in Pima County, 62 early ballots were sent to the elections department from an address where the “voter” did not live, an error rate of 52 percent.

A college fraternity house was also found to have 27 registered voters with an average age of 45 years old.

Here’s the interesting part…

Just as this letter from a whistleblower was made public…

Just as Pima County held a hearing into alleged election fraud…

Joe Biden himself said something very strange:

It’s about who gets to count the vote and whether your vote counts at all.


Join the conversation!

Please share your thoughts about this article below. We value your opinions, and would love to see you add to the discussion!

Hey, Noah here!

Wondering where we went?

Read this and bookmark our new site!

See you over there!

Thanks for sharing!