The democrats are off their rocker-again.
Especially the Governor of California, per his usual.
Newsom states he wants to follow the model of the Anti-Abortion Law which allows a private citizen to sue someone who helps a woman get an abortion in the state of Texas, for gun control.
This would allow private citizens to sue corporations and private individuals who assist in manufacturing and or selling “ghost gun kits” and AR-15’s.
Trending: Q Post 55: “Look To Twitter”
Thereby completely ignoring Federal Law (The Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act 2005)
SCOTUS is letting private citizens in Texas sue to stop abortion?!
If that's the precedent then we'll let Californians sue those who put ghost guns and assault weapons on our streets.
If TX can ban abortion and endanger lives, CA can ban deadly weapons of war and save lives. https://t.co/N5Iur9PEUZ
— Gavin Newsom (@GavinNewsom) December 12, 2021
Of course other democrats want to follow his lead:
WATCH NY Attorney General show support of this on “The View”
BREAKING: New York Attorney General @TishJames tells The View sheâll follow California Gov. @GavinNewsomâs lead in creating a law to empower private citizens to enforce a ghost guns ban: "âŠwe need to hold gun manufacturers and gun distributors liable." pic.twitter.com/SwzBfegkhm
— Shannon Watts (@shannonrwatts) December 14, 2021
I have news for you Newsom….
Abortion (killing babies) is NOT in the constitution, owning firearms are.
Here are some reactions to the recent news:
So can people sue you that get hurt from the criminals that you allow to get out of prison? Or can companies sue you for allowing robberies to happen and then the crooks get released with a slap on the wrist?
— Christine (@cmlshsu) December 12, 2021
Is this guy fucken real? How idiotic. If he (or you) canât see the difference, heâs an idiot.
— The Engineer ðºðž ðŠ (@The_EEngineer) December 12, 2021
ð§µCalifornia hasâand has had for yearsâthe strictest gun laws in the nation, by a country mile
Q: Why do the toughest gun laws in the nation result in only the 24th lowest gun homicide rate?
A: Because they are designed for, and used against, legal owners and *not* criminals 1/ https://t.co/NNCbvLV23L pic.twitter.com/sYTYcyDxyf
— skepticalifornia (@skepticaliblog) December 12, 2021
This man is an idiot…abortion is not in BILL OF RIGHTS like Gun Rights and religion are. Praying against this fool!
Gavin Newsom says he'll use Texas abortion law as model for gun-control measure https://t.co/jsjfeHrcmm #FoxNews
— Make CA Great Againððð (@TrappedInNorCal) December 12, 2021
Can we use the same law framework to sue CA government for increase in violence, homelessness, and tax waste?!
— nav (@realnavsandhu) December 12, 2021
Gavin Newsom is trying to compare apples to oranges and ultimately, his argument is invalid.
According to the Texas Tribune, the Senator who wrote the anti-abortion law, had this to say about it:
State Sen. Bryan Hughes, R-Mineola, who wrote the law, was dismissive of Newsomâs effort to restrict gun rights by using Texasâ legal strategy to ban many abortions. He said he didnât think his enforcement mechanism would be âeffective against firmly established constitutional rights.â
âI would tell Gov. Newsom good luck with that,â Hughes said Monday. âIf California takes that route, theyâll find that California gun owners will violate the law knowing that theyâll be sued and knowing that the Supreme Court has their back because the right to keep and bear arms is clearly in the Constitution, and the courts have clearly and consistently upheld it.â
Gun Control never works, never will work.
Gun Rights are in the constitution, abortion is not.
Sorry Newsom and democrats, your argument is invalid, as it usually is.
Join the conversation!
Please share your thoughts about this article below. We value your opinions, and would love to see you add to the discussion!