The baby of a mother who received two doses of the experimental Moderna COVID-19 injection during her last trimester passed away the day after his birth.
The mother had the two doses on July 19th and August 13th, and her baby boy was expected on October 15th.
Her baby boy arrived on the morning of October 6th, but the birth had multiple serious complications.
As LifeSiteNews notes:
Trending: What Was In Those Bush Sr. Funeral Envelopes? The “First Arrest” To Shock The World Revealed?
A baby whose mother received two COVID vaccine shots during her last trimester of pregnancy was born bleeding from his mouth and nose, and died the day after his birth, according to a recent report to the U.S. government’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System from a foreign “regulatory authority.”
The baby also had an unstable heartbeat during labor.
Warning: this article is absolutely heartbreaking, read at your own peril.
This infant death is 1 of 52 reported deaths among 30,550 adverse events recorded by VAERS for children under 17 years old as of December 3https://t.co/D690lPeErV
— LibertySavage (@AxelSavage4) December 13, 2021
“In the NICU, his result of examination showed abnormal blood coagulation, pulmonary hemorrhage [acute bleeding from the lungs], and cardiac dysfunction.” His father believes it was from the vaccine. https://t.co/aomBzkriCX
— Jenny Hatch (@JennyHatch) December 11, 2021
“The doctor said that after the patient was born, there was a cry. When the umbilical cord was cut for newborn care, the nursing staff found that the patient had symptoms of oral and nose bleeding, and immediately asked the pediatrician to intubate and give him oxygen, and he was admitted to the NICU,” according to the report received by the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) November 18 from an unidentified foreign health agency. “In the NICU, his result of examination showed abnormal blood coagulation, pulmonary hemorrhage [acute bleeding from the lungs], and cardiac dysfunction.”
According to the VAERS report (No. 1879991) on the death following “transplacental exposure” to the mRNA vaccine, it was unknown if an autopsy was performed and no cause of death was reported, but the infant’s father suspected it was related to the vaccine.
VAERS ID 1879991 first appeared in the system on 11/19/2021.
Another disturbing report is VAERS ID 1901192, which involved an 8-year-old boy from Wyoming.
Before taking the first dose of the experimental Pfizer COVID-19 jab, the boy was “totally healthy and active.”
Within 2 days of receiving the injection, the boy was hospitalized in the ICU with myocarditis.
As stated in VAERS ID 1901192:
This is a spontaneous report from a non-contactable consumer. An 8-year-old male patient received bnt162b2 (BNT162B2), via an unspecified route of administration on Nov2021, at the age of 8-years-old, (Batch/Lot number was not reported) as DOSE 1, SINGLE for covid-19 immunisation. The patient’s medical history and concomitant medications were not reported. The patient received Pfizer vaccine and was in ICU with myocarditis within 2 days (unspecified day of Nov2021). He was “totally healthy and active” prior to vaccination. The outcome of the event was unknown. Treatment was received for the events. The lot number for (BNT162B2), was not provided and will be requested during follow-up.
In the recent VAERS data update, there was a reported death of a 2-year-old boy from Alaska following the COVID-19 injection.
The report of his death briefly appeared in reports posted on VAERS. The record said the boy “began bleeding out the mouth, eyes, nose and ears within six hours of the shot” and died the same evening. The report appeared briefly on the VAERS website on Thanksgiving Monday in a batch of 14,529 records which were downloaded, according to a VAERS analysis website run by an anonymous data tracker. The retracted reports were then reloaded onto the website on December 3, but the record of the two-year-old’s death was not among them.
While no COVID-19 injection is authorized for children under 5, we’ve reported incidents around the world of toddlers receiving it by mistake.
One Maryland Walgreens gave a 4-year-old the COVID-19 injection instead of the flu shot.
The same mistake happened to an Indiana family and 3-year-old Canadian girl.
And in Brazil, a two-month-old girl and a four-month-old boy were hospitalized due to a similar medical mishap.
LifeSiteNews contacted the CDC to confirm the case and asked why it was removed from the database.
The agency did not respond to the questions.
The report’s removal raises the question of whether the CDC has scrubbed other VAERS reports from the system to make them unviewable for the public.
VAERS Analysis discusses the scrubbed report:
Something very interesting happened this past week over the Thanksgiving holidays. The regular Friday weekly VAERS data release (11/26) did not happen, presumably because of the holiday. Instead, the release happened on Monday, 11/29. However, what was unusual was that initially at the time of release, the download files contained an extra 14,529 records which were not supposed to be there. These files were quickly replaced with the correct ones, but not before Albert Benavides (aka WelcomeTheEagle88 — the CDC can’t get anything past Mr. Eagle Eyes!), was able to download the files first. Anyone else who subsequently downloaded the data release files, ended up downloading files which didn’t contain the extra 14,529 records. These extra records which Albert received were obviously slotted to be released the subsequent week (for the 12/3 release).
So what would happen during this Friday’s (12/3) weekly data release? Would we see these 14,529 records in the data release? Would there be any missing? What actually ended up happening?
Well, all of the 14,529 extra records from 11/29 did in fact show up in the Friday 12/3 data release…EXCEPT for this one below, a 2 year-old from Alaska who died on the same day as he received the Covid injection:
Below is the missing VAERS record of the 2-year-old boy:
VAERS Analysis asked these important questions:
This here folks, is proof that the CDC does in fact withhold records from public viewing. This record was clearly included in the 14,529 records that someone (the holiday crew perhaps?) mistakenly published alongside the regular records on 11/29 (though the extra records were quickly removed).
Will this record show up in a future release? Perhaps. But what should concern us all is the following:
(1) Why were there records being withheld if they were already available to be made public? If this is indeed the most “Intense Safety Monitoring in US History“, then why wait to make any relevant data public? Are they throttling the data by design? The excuse that perhaps these records were being held up because the CDC still needed to make changes to the records does not hold up to scrutiny, since the 14,529 records (minus 1) which were mistakenly included on 11/29 were identical to the records which showed up on 12/3.
(2) Why did they choose to withhold the record for the 2 year old, such that no one would even know it had ever existed if they hadn’t accidentally “published” it temporarily on 11/29?
(3) Why is anyone even injecting 2 year olds (injection date was very recent on 11/18/21)? These products have not been authorized for 2 year olds…
(4) What is it with them needing to remove VAERS records of 2 year olds?
In VAERS ID 1887456, it says the patient began bleeding out of the mouth, eyes, nose, and ears within six hours of the shot.
Bleeding disorders are described in thousands of VAERS reports including 2,177 records of deaths following COVID vaccination. Many of these reports include descriptions of patients experiencing nosebleeds, blood in stool from gastric bleeds, brain bleeds, bruising, and bleeding from the mouth.
One VAERS report describes a five-month-old breastfeeding baby who died from a rare autoimmune bleeding disorder, Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura (TTP) after developing a rash the day following his mother receiving a COVID vaccine.
For the sake of our children, please toss these toxic injections in the dumpster.
Join the conversation!
Please share your thoughts about this article below. We value your opinions, and would love to see you add to the discussion!