Skip to main content
We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here.

COVER UP? Former Wisconsin State Justice Michael Gableman Exposes Wisconsin Mayors


I saw someone on Twitter post this graphic that said “Wisconsin had safe and secure elections”…..

I almost spit out my drink at the absurdity of that statement. First of all, I seriously doubt that there has ever been a ‘safe and secure’ election in U.S. history.

Secondly, Wisconsin allegedly had 23,000 ballots which came from one address, 82,000 ballots which were ‘lost’, and 200,000 voters who were quietly removed from the voter rolls after the election.

At this point the only person thinking that Wisconsin had safe and secure elections is either a sheep or a Teamster.

This isn’t even addressing the point of Zuckerberg and his wife allegedly funneling more money into U.S. elections, via 503-c non-profit corporations, than the federal government did….

Former Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice Michael Gableman has had enough of all of this, and is now trying to jail certain Wisconsin mayors which he claims are covering up the fraud.

They’re covering up the fraud and so much more…

Take a look:

RSBN brought us more:

Gableman issued subpoenas for the administrator of the Wisconsin Election Commission and the Executive Director of the Milwaukee Election Commission, along with several county clerks. Much of the investigation surrounds the involvement of records of grants related to the Center for Technology and Civic Life (CTCL), which is funded by Mark Zuckerberg, the CEO of social media giant Facebook, Gateway Pundit reported.

The CTCL, with Zuckerberg at the helm, have come under fire for reportedly gaining access to election operations in several Wisconsin cities, including Madison and Green Bay.


According to The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, Gableman is trying to jail these mayors:

Gableman this week sought court orders requiring Madison Mayor Satya Rhodes-Conway and Green Bay Mayor Eric Genrich to answer his questions or be jailed if they decline to do so.

In his filings, he contended the pair had defied his request that they meet with him in November. The two have disputed they were required to meet with him then.


Join the conversation!

Please share your thoughts about this article below. We value your opinions, and would love to see you add to the discussion!

Hey, Noah here.

I post all day long over in Telegram.

If we’re not already connected, please follow me over there.

I’ll see you there!

We Love Trump
Thanks for sharing!