Infants have a statistically 100% survival rate from COVID-19.
This virus isn’t a threat to their lives.
It’s immoral, reckless, and pure evil to inject children with something that only presents potential harm.
Medical experts raised concerns about rushing to test infants due to their extremely low risk of COVID-19 complications.
I’ll take that statement a step further.
Giving the experimental COVID-19 to a child should be a crime.
— John Chamberlain, MHA, LFACHE (@misterchambo) November 10, 2021
Testing the jabs on 6 month olds is absurdly dangerous and nonsensical.
There are locales where close to 100% of residents are vaccinated and still COVID blazes on. What else does anyone need to know?
The jabs don't stop the spread! They speed it up!https://t.co/objCcuffM1
— Dr. Syed Haider (@DrSyedHaider) November 10, 2021
NO means NO!!! Leave our infants alone!!!
— Dee 💯 🇺🇸 ☠️ (@Derameth) November 10, 2021
Moderna testing COVID-19 vaccine on infants nationwide despite 'negligible' risk from virus…
All adults, then 5 years old and up, and now Big Pharm wants to jab infants. This is seriously evil shit. https://t.co/FkbSXUFcpp
— judy morris (@judymorris3) November 10, 2021
The Moderna COVID-19 vaccine is being tested on infants across the country, even as medical experts question the wisdom of moving so fast on novel vaccine development in a population with such low risk from COVID.#JustTheNewshttps://t.co/Q1O1LHRXHS
— Just the News (@JustTheNews) November 10, 2021
Read further details of the KidCOVE Study:
The primary purpose of the KidCOVE Study is to test the safety and effectiveness of the study vaccine, called mRNA-1273, that may protect children between the ages of 6 months to < 12 years from getting sick if they come into contact with SARS-CoV-2, which causes COVID-19.
Moderna plans to enroll this study in two parts, staggering the recruitment of three different age groups. The first age group will start in children between the ages of 6 years to less than 12 years old. The second age group, recruiting later on, will be for children between the ages of 2 years to less than 6 years old. Finally, the third, and last group to start, will be for children ages 6 months to less than 2 years old. Please be aware that it may be several months before your child’s age group and/or a site near you opens.
The study includes 79 locations in 31 states around the nation.
You’ll find more study details listed on ClinicalTrials.gov:
Brief Summary:The primary goal for this study is to evaluate up to 3 dose levels of mRNA-1273 vaccine given to healthy children in 2 doses, 28 days apart.
This is a Phase 2/3, 2-part, open-label, dose-escalation, age de-escalation, randomized, observer-blind, placebo-controlled, expansion study intended to infer the effectiveness of mRNA-1273 in children aged 6 months to less than 12 years.
|Actual Study Start Date :||March 15, 2021|
|Estimated Primary Completion Date :||June 12, 2023|
|Estimated Study Completion Date :||June 12, 2023|
*Source – ClinicalTrials.gov*
Just the News reported:
More than 13,000 children will receive “up to 3 dose levels” of the vaccine or a placebo, according to Moderna’s KidCOVE summary. Excluded from eligibility: children with a “known history” of COVID infection or “close contact” with an infected person within two weeks of the trial, as well as those who have received monoclonal antibodies in the past six months.
Asked about the ethical implications of testing a vaccine on a population at such low risk, especially relative to their risk from seasonal influenza, Hartman wrote in an email that “many kids” have developed COVID due to the Delta variant.
“This kept them out of daycare, out of school, and/or they went on to infect the people around them, including immunocompromised relatives,” he said, claiming 30,000 children were hospitalized in August.
He compared child COVID deaths to date — nearly 600 — with the flu season directly before COVID, which killed 188. COVID is arguably in its third season, having circulated in the U.S. as early as December 2019.
The argument that COVID-19 presents a risk to children is hogwash.
We now have a major crisis as the race is on to vaccinate our 5- to 11-year-old children who bring no risk to the table, with a vaccine that has been shown to be sub-optimal and potentially harmful. https://t.co/dz4dPuC4d3
— George Fareed (@GeorgeFareed2) November 6, 2021
Dr. Ben Carson speaks up:
“Do we want to put our children at risk, when we know that the risk of the disease to them is relatively small, but we don’t know what the future risks are? Why would we do a thing like that? It makes no sense whatsoever.” https://t.co/eh73nlgaO7
— Dr. Syed Haider (@DrSyedHaider) November 5, 2021
Dear Pfizer: Leave the Children Alone
There is very little risk and no data or evidence or science to justify any of the Covid-19 injections in children.
— P. D. Mangan Health & Freedom Maximalist 🇺🇸 (@Mangan150) November 6, 2021
Doctor @DrKellyVictory reiterates the fact that children have essentially zero risk to COVID-19, and have no need for the vaccine.
She says the vaccine has only been tested on children for a few months, and that's not enough to see the safety.https://t.co/AqCQsbgLuD
— KUSI News (@KUSINews) November 5, 2021
Harvard Medical School epidemiologist Martin Kulldorff responded to the previous statement at Just the News:
It’s true that children are “about as likely to be infected as adults,” including from Delta, but there’s “more than a thousand-fold difference in mortality risk between the old and the young,” he wrote in an email. The risk is “minuscule” even for children under one.
It’s wrong to blame the infection for keeping them out of school, “since most children are either asymptomatic or only mildly symptomatic,” he said. “What kept them out of school were the misguided pandemic restrictions.”
They are also “not major spreaders of COVID,” and vaccination is “not a burden that we should put on children” when older, high-risk people can be protected through vaccination, Kulldorff said.
He emphasized the CDC has never studied how many of the reported child COVID deaths were incidental to the virus versus caused by it; the 576 deaths cover the entire 0-17 age range; and flu season deaths among children vary widely from year to year.