WATCH: Boris Johnson Acknowledges COVID-19 Jabs Don’t Stop Transmission of the Virus

How many people have to say this before the others wake up?

Fraudci and CDC Director Rochelle Walensky admitted months ago that COVID-19 jabs don’t prevent transmission of the virus.

Vaccinated & unvaccinated carry identical viral loads and can each spread the virus to others.

That makes vaccine passports useless.

Not only are they discriminatory and create segregated societies, but COVID-19 passes make zero scientific sense.

Even politicians openly admit the COVID-19 jabs can’t stop transmission.

UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson admitted it in this clip below:

So for the dozens of people berating me today for saying vaccines don't stop infection or transmission, here is Boris Johnson. Thanks @EssexPR https://t.co/BIQNMGwYEs

— Hugh Osmond (@hughosmond) October 22, 2021

If you notice, it’s another changing of the goal posts.

When the COVID-19 jabs first became available, millions across the globe believed they wouldn’t catch the virus and their lives would return to normal.

They thought one or two doses would end everything.

But the waning effectiveness and decreased immunity caused by the jabs made more people vulnerable to catching COVID-19.

That’s where the discussion changed to boosters.

The Daily Sceptic asked these questions after Johnson’s admission:

But if being double-vaccinated doesn’t prevent you being infected or transmitting the virus after just a few months, why will a booster be much better? Why is it so important to prevent transmission and infection through boosters anyway, when protection against serious illness and death is holding up well and that’s all that really matters?

Another question for the Prime Minster: What now is the point of vaccine passports and mandates? Why sack hundreds of thousands of care home workers and health care staff who decline vaccination, most of whom have served faithfully throughout the pandemic, if vaccination makes no difference to how infectious you are and so does not protect others?

Now that the Prime Minister himself has let the cat out of the bag on the vaccines not preventing spread, will the media start reporting on this data properly? And will the Government now join the dots and abandon vaccine coercion?

I’ll take the conversation a step further.

Why do we need any COVID-19 jabs when there are early treatments available?

WLT has reported on safe, effective treatments like Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine.

If the experimental injections couldn’t stop transmission with the first two doses, why bother giving out millions of boosters?

Shouldn’t we focus on making early treatments available instead?

But I think that’s a question to ask the Big Pharma companies earning record profits for the experimental COVID-19 injections.

And the politicians that own their stocks.

#COVID19 vaccines have minted at least NINE new pharma billionaires

Moderna CEO is now worth a whopping $4.3b after his company was granted emergency use authorization in the US in December

But it's all about 'public health'. Trust us. https://t.co/R7iioKOMNd via @MailOnline

— Doctors for Covid Ethics (@Drs4CovidEthics) May 23, 2021

Of the most widely held stocks by members of Congress…
Pfizer is Number Five on the Top Ten list.
There will be boosters from now until Doomsday. pic.twitter.com/ZRB6I6nohD

— Ben Salomonsky (@Ben_Salomonsky) October 23, 2021

https://twitter.com/Pamela_Jones/status/1451993539068506119