Finally, a sliver of common sense arose from the FDA.
On Friday, the FDA Advisory Panel reviewed the Biden Administration’s plan to move forward with booster shots for the experimental Pfizer COVID-19 jab.
The panel overwhelming disapproved of boosters.
FDA Panel Rejects Pfizer Booster Jabs Scuttling Biden Administration's Plan https://t.co/QdadT4ZLYF
— zerohedge (@zerohedge) September 17, 2021
Trending: EXCLUSIVE: Pfizer & Moderna mRNA Jabs Could Lead to a Slew of Neurological Degenerative Diseases
FDA PANEL VOTES 16-3 AGAINST APPROVING COVID BOOSTER
— zerohedge (@zerohedge) September 17, 2021
https://twitter.com/Breaking911/status/1438950672603439105
BREAKING: FDA panel votes against approving a Pfizer booster dose for COVID-19, weeks after President Joe Biden promised all Americans would be able to get boosters beginning in late September.
— Dylan Housman (@Dylan_Housman) September 17, 2021
https://twitter.com/DrEliDavid/status/1438950907568345091
It’s a significant development since it clearly objects to Dictator Joe’s goal of starting boosters on September 20th.
For once, a federal agency took a stand against this administration.
It's a legit revolt. The White House is not happy. Here's the strategy to roll out boosters, right from their COVID plan. pic.twitter.com/WTK7W5Vdjd
— Jordan Schachtel @ dossier.today (@JordanSchachtel) September 17, 2021
But will Dictator Joe and his cronies simply ignore the FDA?
After the tyrannical mandates passed last week, that wouldn’t be a shocker.
No but it's good to finally have some dissent out in the open
— Jordan Schachtel @ dossier.today (@JordanSchachtel) September 17, 2021
Another thing that surprised me from the FDA’s review is the data they’re analyzing.
The alarming VAERS report and Israel’s dramatic surge came into the discussion.
FDA panel just voted 16-3 AGAINST approving the boosters
This slide was shown at their meeting pic.twitter.com/nB9lN0qVKx
— Dr. Benjamin Braddock (@GraduatedBen) September 17, 2021
Watch this clip from Dr. Jessica Rose:
BOMBSHELL Info During Todays FDA Vax Meeting
Dr Rose States Based on The VAERS Data… The Risks Far Outweigh The Benefits Especially For Children
Over A 1000% Increase In Adverse Events In 2021!
Questions If The Shots Are Driving The Variants
Clear Failure of These Products pic.twitter.com/ju7WV1Fk2j
— Spiro (@Spiro_Ghost) September 17, 2021
And they had this slide about the miniscule risks COVID-19 presents to younger age groups.
If you are young and relatively health, Covid is not dangerous for you…
Says the damn FDA… https://t.co/TG3XwycurM
— T (@SevenSeasGoonie) September 17, 2021
Unfortunately, I have my doubts common sense will prevail.
Because the panel reserves the right to amend the asked question.
The vote is in from the @US_FDA committee re boosters and the majority has voted no to the question below. However, they reserved the right to amend the question being asked in a second round of voting. pic.twitter.com/RR3wk8U3XN
— Dr. Sanjay Gupta (@drsanjaygupta) September 17, 2021
BREAKING: A panel of advisers to the FDA recommended against approval of a Pfizer booster shot for people 16 years and older. There may be another vote on boosters for a limited age group.https://t.co/wIBccypRER
— NPR (@NPR) September 17, 2021
U.S. FDA OFFICIAL SAYS ITS ADVISORY COMMITTEE COULD PROPOSE MODIFIED VOTING QUESTION IF IT VOTES AGAINST PFIZER'S COVID-19 BOOSTER VACCINE APPLICATION
— zerohedge (@zerohedge) September 17, 2021
Zero Hedge reported:
After the chairman of the FDA advisory committee said the question being evaluated might be modified amid growing concern about the balance between safety and efficacy of the Pfizer jabs, the committee has disappointed Big Pharma and the Biden Administration by voting against approving booster shots for the Pfizer-BioNTech jab.
The final tally was Yes: 2, No: 16, Abstain: 0
As CNBC’s Meg Tirrell reports, with advisors now considering a modified question, this might not be the final vote of the day.
The results hit just as Dr. Fauci was set to start an interview with the CNBC, where he was left twisting in the wind, insisting that he was totally unsurprised by the FDA’s decision not to rubber-stamp the Biden Administration’s non-science-based plan, while acting like he and the rest of the admin’s team wasn’t pushing for approval all along.
Pressed to explain Israel’s ongoing surge, which booster jabs have been unsuccessful in stamping out, Dr. Fauci droned on incoherently about the science behind “breakthrough infections”.
Update (1255ET): As The FDA Panel hears from various health officials during the public comment section on the pros and cons of a booster shot, some very uncomfortable facts are coming out about vaccine efficacy and vaccine side effects – facts that anywhere else would immediately be deplatformed and banned from discourse.
Despite the FDA disapproving of boosters, some places already offer them for immunocompromised populations.
New York City is one such place.
From NYC Health + Hospitals:
As COVID-19 rates continue to rise throughout the country, we have a new tool in our arsenal to combat the spread: a third dose of vaccine for those with moderately to severely compromised immune systems, or “immunocompromised” individuals. On August 13, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) began recommending an additional dose of the Pfizer or Moderna vaccine for those in this category who had received an mRNA vaccine. Please note that additional vaccine doses are not recommended for any other group at this time.
Immunocompromised individuals are those who have a disease or are taking a drug that weakens their immune system and makes it harder for them to fight infections.
Those who fall into the category of moderately to severely immunocompromised make up about three percent of the U.S. population and are at high risk for severe illness if they contract COVID-19.
According to the CDC, the recommendation for an additional vaccine dose is based on studies showing that some people with medical conditions that weaken their immune systems do not respond as well to two doses of the mRNA vaccines when compared to those without these conditions. The idea, therefore, is that a third dose will increase the immune response.
Eligibility
To be eligible for a third dose, a person must:
- Be at least 12 years old
- Have received a second dose of either the Pfizer or Moderna vaccine at least four weeks (28 days) ago
- Be considered moderately to severely immunocompromised
I still think boosters are coming.
There’s too much profit at stake and too much corruption in the federal government for boosters not to roll out.
Stay tuned for more coverage.
Join the conversation!
Please share your thoughts about this article below. We value your opinions, and would love to see you add to the discussion!