Isn’t that a weird coincidence?
Around the same time everyone is talking about the FDA’s fake approval of the Pfizer jab, another approval was quietly announced.
A blood thinner medication for children.
Why would children need a blood thinner?
Maybe to treat potential blood clots caused by the experimental jab?
While the FDA deceived the public to extend the EUA of the Pfizer jab, Dr. Death says he wants an EUA for COVID-19 jabs for children under the age of 12.
The timing makes any critical thinker suspicious.
Is the FDA & Big Pharma expecting more children to get diagnosed with blood clots?
The medication is called Pradaxa.
Here’s more info:
Well well well do you believe in coincidence? I don't, don't have to be Poirot tonwoek out this one pic.twitter.com/sXPtTSJxno
— The Found (@TheFound5) August 29, 2021
Seems suspiciously well timed… https://t.co/6EDkDEIjp0
— Tania Groth (@TaniaGroth) August 24, 2021
21 June 2021: FDA approves ‘oral pellets to treat children 3 months to less than 12 years old with venous thromboembolism (a condition where blood clots form in the veins) directly after they have been treated with a blood thinner given by injection for at least 5 days.’ 🤔🧐🤨 https://t.co/H49cRVpEqp
— AhRani 🌌🚀 (@AhraniLogan) August 29, 2021
It's no coincidence that the FDA just approved a blood thinner for children #bloodclots
— 🇺🇸 Mark T 🇺🇸👌🐘 (@MetMark) August 26, 2021
Blood thinner for children?!? Ah yes…that would help with blood clots. What causes blood clots?🤔 💉
FDA Approves First Oral Blood Thinning Medication for Children | FDA https://t.co/gT4ErFeSVj
— Kish (@KishFig5) August 26, 2021
Think Myocarditis then ask why was Pfizers drug which is a blood thinner for children approved by FDA this week.
Then ask why did the media claim the Pfizer 💉when its still under EUA ? https://t.co/9NEPqvhbyR
— Didtheearthmoveforyou? (@Didtheearthmov1) August 26, 2021
Here’s the FDA News Release:
Today, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved Pradaxa (dabigatran etexilate) oral pellets to treat children 3 months to less than 12 years old with venous thromboembolism (a condition where blood clots form in the veins) directly after they have been treated with a blood thinner given by injection for at least five days. The FDA also approved Pradaxa oral pellets to prevent recurrent clots among patients 3 months to less than 12 years old who completed treatment for their first venous thromboembolism.
In addition, Pradaxa was approved in capsule form to treat blood clots in patients eight years and older with venous thromboembolism directly after they have been treated with a blood thinner given by injection for at least five days, and to prevent recurrent clots in patients eight years and older who completed treatment for their first venous thromboembolism.
Pradaxa is the first FDA-approved blood thinning medication that children can take by mouth; the only other approved blood thinning medication for children is given by injection. Pradaxa was originally approved in 2010 to reduce the risk of stroke and systemic embolism in adult patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation.
“The FDA is committed to helping our youngest patients with serious medical conditions have treatments that are relatively easy to take,” said Ann Farrell, M.D., director of the Division of Non-Malignant Hematology in the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. “With today’s approval of Pradaxa, pediatric patients have another therapeutic option to treat and prevent potentially deadly blood clots.”
Blood clots can be a serious problem in children as well as adults. Children are most at risk for blood clots if they have cancer, congenital heart disease, a central venous catheter, or are admitted to an intensive care unit. Venous thromboembolism can lead to complications, including swelling and discomfort near the clot, chest pain, lung damage, and even death.
The safety and efficacy of Pradaxa for treating blood clots in patients younger than 18 was evaluated in one study of 267 pediatric patients. In this open-label study, patients were randomly assigned to receive either Pradaxa or standard of care. The study compared the two groups for the number of patients who met the composite endpoint (a combination of multiple clinical endpoints), which meant that they had not died from a blood clot, their blood clots had completely resolved, and they had no additional blood clots. Results showed that 81 (45.8%) of the 177 people taking Pradaxa met the composite endpoint compared to 38 (42.2%) of the 90 patients who received standard of care.
The safety of Pradaxa to prevent recurrent blood clots in the same pediatric population was evaluated in an open-label, single-arm study in 214 patients with a history of blood clots. The primary endpoints of the study were recurrence of blood clots, major and minor bleeding events, and death (both overall and related to blood clots). The safety of Pradaxa with long-term use was similar to the previously discussed study. Recurrence of blood clots occurred in three patients (1.4%), which was comparable to prior standard-of-care treatments.
The most common side effects of Pradaxa include digestive system symptoms and bleeding. Pradaxa can cause serious and fatal bleeding. Pradaxa is not recommended for patients with bioprosthetic heart valves or triple-positive antiphospholipid syndrome. Pradaxa has a boxed warning cautioning that early treatment discontinuation may increase the risk of blood clots and that blood accumulation within parts of the spinal cord (spinal or epidural hematomas) in patients undergoing spinal procedures may cause serious side effects.
Smells like typical cronyism to me.
Give people the treatment to the problem they created.
And it’s a problem that’s costing people their lives.
They’re evil scumbags.