CNN Finally Admits Hunter Biden Scam: “Bribes to the President”

Well, what do you know…

Even a broken clock is right twice a day.

CNN has finally admitted that something fishy is going on with Hunter Biden.

They’ve finally caught onto what the rest of us have known for months.

In an “investigative” report, CNN questioned the legitimacy of Hunter Biden’s “art.”

You see, Hunter Biden will begin selling his art for thousands, if not hundreds of thousands, of dollars.

Is Hunter Picasso?

Is he some art prodigy?

Of course not!

So why would people pay so much money to get art from a drug addict?

Could it be because the “art sale” is actually a scam?

That’s what CNN’s segment appeared to imply.

The art sale is really just a fancy cover up to get bribes to the “big guy.”

That would be Joe Biden.

Watch below!

Obama's former ethics chief, @waltshaub, on WH's deal to help Hunter sell art: It's a "perfect mechanism for funneling bribes to [the] president"

"It’s an industry that’s notorious for money laundering." pic.twitter.com/RnOz0rJbfw

— Tom Elliott (@tomselliott) July 9, 2021

You know it’s bad when even the folks at CNN are catching onto your scheme.

But who would have thought that the most corrupt regime would once again be caught in the middle of financial cover-ups?

We’re certainly not surprised!

You’ve got to see Sean Spicer’s take on Hunter’s work.

Spicer appeared on Newsmax.

This is HILARIOUS!

EXCLUSIVE: @SeanSpicer showcases Hunter Biden's latest work of art. pic.twitter.com/hFvCXD1KYk

— NEWSMAX (@NEWSMAX) July 9, 2021

Even foreign media is beginning to pick up on this story.

The BBC reports that the White House is now on defense mode:

The White House has defended its role in helping to broker a deal that will shroud art deals by President Joe Biden’s son in secrecy.

Paintings by Hunter Biden are expected to fetch up to $500,000 (£360,000) apiece at auction this autumn.

Any buyers will be kept anonymous to stop them seeking political influence with the Bidens, the White House says.

But a former White House ethics chief said the arrangement was “very disappointing”.

The younger Biden’s business dealings in Ukraine, China and elsewhere have often been held up by Republican critics as a conflict of interest for his father, which both Bidens deny.

Hunter is currently facing a federal tax investigation, though he has said he is “100% certain” he will be cleared.

When asked on Friday about the White House’s reported role in the art sale, press secretary Jen Psaki said: “After careful consideration, a system has been established that allows for Hunter Biden to work in his profession within reasonable safeguards.

“Of course, he has the right to pursue an artistic career just like any child of a president has the right to pursue a career.”

As part of the arrangement, the buyers are supposed to remain anonymous to Hunter Biden – who is a self-taught artist – in order to prevent influence-peddlers seeking to curry favour with the US president.

“I think it would be challenging for an anonymous person who we don’t know and Hunter Biden doesn’t know to have influence,” Ms Psaki said.

But Walter Shaub, who served as ethics chief under President Barack Obama, rejected the White House’s claim that the arrangement would ensure transparency.

Let’s be honest.

We all know that if this were Donald Trump Jr., the media would be outraged.

The Democrat party would be attempting to impeach President Trump.

AGAIN!

Yet… Hunter Biden does it, and it’s hardly a scandal!

Fortunately, people are still attempting to get the truth out there.

Absolutely outrageous government resources are being used to manage "child" Hunter Biden's (he's 51) "art" career because he's shady AF. https://t.co/UVJ2N8RsiU

— Katie Pavlich (@KatiePavlich) July 9, 2021

Everyone knows the Hunter Biden art sale is a money laundering scheme to buy influence.

— Tim Young (@TimRunsHisMouth) July 10, 2021

Hunter Biden has to be required to report on the source of the $75,000 to $500,000 he will reportedly be paid for each piece of his new “art”. This is an invitation to corruption. The Congress should pass a small law requiring him to report the sources of the money

— Newt Gingrich (@newtgingrich) July 10, 2021

Walter Shaub, Obama's former ethics chief, says the White House's deal to help Hunter Biden sell his art is "the perfect mechanism for funnelling bribes" to the president. pic.twitter.com/T9AhTgNT21

— The Post Millennial (@TPostMillennial) July 10, 2021

This is such a bad idea on so many levels.

The fact that the Biden White House can even get away with this is absurd.

We all know that that Trumps would NEVER be allowed to do even something half as bad as this.

The double standard is truly astounding.

The Wall Street Journal confirms:

As President Biden’s son Hunter prepares for an art exhibition this fall that could include selling his paintings at prices up to $500,000, the White House is reportedly working with his attorney on a strategy to avoid ethical compromises. Here it is: Keep everything secret. Yes, for real, that’s the plan.

The New York gallery hosting the sale, media reports say, will refuse “suspicious” offers, including those over list price. The names of the buyers and bidders will be kept confidential, even from Hunter. As the paintings sell, apparently hundreds of thousands of dollars will simply appear in his bank account, and neither he nor the public will know where it came from.

You don’t feel reassured? Sources in the art world say the prices being floated—from $75,000 to $500,000, depending on the piece—are seriously high, especially for an unknown painter doing a first sale. So the question is who might be quietly trying to funnel money to President Biden’s son.

The art sale is a bad idea, full stop. But at least transparency would let bids be scrutinized in real time, preferably before a sale is final. Instead the White House is proposing opacity, even as its press aides brag that President Biden “has established the highest ethical standards of any administration in American history.”

Would the promised confidentiality be kept? Whispers about who bought what are inevitable. A Russian oligarch could have a proxy purchase a $500,000 painting for the purpose of leaking the information to hurt President Biden’s credibility. Why take this risk?

Folks, the Democrat party will try to hide this from the public.

Why?

Because they know that the majority of Americans are good people.

We do not want to see corruption or bribery in politics.

Please help us spread the word!

Share this article with your friends and help us shed light on the corrupt Biden regime!