Hold up for one second.
The name of the database is “Results, Tally, AND Reporting”? This seems like a pretty big database to delete by accident.
A lot of outlets and reports point to the idea that this database was some sort of copy of an existing database—that it wasn’t THAT important or anything, or that it was not deleted but ‘hidden.’
Those who have been paying attention though will no doubt remember Matt DePerno’s seismic findings on how tabulation results can be changed and date stamped retroactively.
In other words: maybe if these deleted databases are copies of existing databases perhaps they were deleted when someone changed and back stamped results.
They could have deleted the database just in case it may have by chance had any incriminating evidence left over from changing the tabulation results and backstamping them.
I am not saying that this is definitely what happened, but it isn’t far fetched to think about this in light of DePerno’s recent findings.
After all, why keep exact copies of a database on hand anyway?
Here is what we currently know:
[zombify_post]
Join the conversation!
Please share your thoughts about this article below. We value your opinions, and would love to see you add to the discussion!