Aren’t you tired of these idiotic lockdowns?
2020 has morphed into 1984 thanks to the authoritarian rule of tyrants who think they can “protect” us better than ourselves.
It’s maddening and I’m sick of it.
Democrats blindly shouting science just because con-man Fauci and creepy Bill Gates of Hell spew their propaganda from their Big Pharma thrones.
Well, we have the science to counter the medical tyranny that has a stranglehold on our country.
The mainstream media won’t dare touch it, but a comprehensive study from Wuhan observed roughly 10 million residents in the original ground zero of COVID-19.
And look at what the scientists from mostly China, but also Australia and the United Kingdom found:
A study of 10 million in Wuhan found no spread of Covid from people having no symptoms; why continue the lockdowns ?
Asymptomatic transmission of COVID-19 didn’t occur at all, study of 10 million finds | News | LifeSite https://t.co/rC6ZhShHSg
— JESUSisComingBack🕚 (@GoodShepherd316) December 28, 2020
https://twitter.com/NatyLiy/status/1343286942473994240
https://twitter.com/girly_GRRRL/status/1343915442746785792
Another study showing the same thing: asymptomatic spread is exceedingly rare.
"There were no positive tests amongst 1,174 close contacts of asymptomatic cases."
STAY HOME WHEN SICK! (That's how COVID spreads.)https://t.co/ZQwEdQ4AuT https://t.co/QpFUypj7tX
— U.S. Army Garrison Daegu (@USAGDaegu) December 28, 2020
Wait a minute?
You mean there was never asymptomatic spread of COVID-19?
Even in Wuhan, China?
That’s what it looks like folks.
If you remember, asymptomatic spread was the primary reason for the draconian lockdowns in the first place.
They said carrying on with our normal lives would cause a medical catastrophe and kill over 2 million people in America alone.
Asymptomatic spread is why they stole our freedom and ability to decide for ourselves how to protect our loved ones.
It’s why they systematically destroyed over 100,000 American small businesses.
More than 100,000 small businesses have closed forever b/c of the pandemic & lockdowns. They need more than a relief bill. They need the FREEDOM to open. https://t.co/3hdK4KUBV5
— Team Haley (@TeamHaley) December 21, 2020
It was all a lie.
Are you listening?
Asymptomatic spread was all a LIE!
Lockdowns were based on a lie.
The screening of Wuhan residents was completed in MAY and the study results were released in NOVEMBER.
Yet, their lies continue and too many Americans won’t put their foot down to end the authoritarian rule of these tyrants.
Many places in America are still under strict lockdowns and nonsense mask mandates are still in effect.
BREAKING! Do mask mandates work? Our analysis below.
We looked at cases on days where mask mandates were in place vs when they were not. We calculated the cases per day adjusted for population and:WITH MASK MANDATE:
27 cases per day per 100K peopleNO MASK MADATE
17 cases— Justin Hart (@justin_hart) December 20, 2020
The science agrees with freedom of choice and ending the lockdowns.
But too many Americans continue to go through the motions.
Many places within the country are rotting minute by minute the longer we wait to demand our freedom back.
If these latest developments don’t wake up the science believers, I don’t know what will.
Life Site News further elaborated on the narrative-shattering study:
WUHAN, China, December 23, 2020 (LifeSiteNews) – A study of almost 10 million people in Wuhan, China, found that asymptomatic spread of COVID-19 did not occur at all, thus undermining the need for lockdowns, which are built on the premise of the virus being unwittingly spread by infectious, asymptomatic people.
Published in November in the scientific journal Nature Communications, the paper was compiled by 19 scientists, mainly from the Huazhong University of Science and Technology in Wuhan, but also from scientific institutions across China as well as in the U.K. and Australia. It focused on the residents of Wuhan, ground zero for COVID-19, where 9,899,828 people took part in a screening program between May 14 and June 1, which provided clear results as to the possibility of any asymptomatic transmission of the virus.
Asymptomatic transmission has been the underlying justification of lockdowns enforced all across the world. The most recent guidance from the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) still states that the virus “can be spread by people who do not have symptoms.” In fact, the CDC claimed that asymptomatic people “are estimated to account for more than 50 percent of transmissions.”
U.K. Health Secretary Matt Hancock also promoted this message, explaining that the concept of asymptomatic spread of COVID-19 led to the U.K. advocating masks and referring to the “problem of asymptomatic transmission.”
However, the new study in Nature Communications, titled “Post-lockdown SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid screening in nearly 10 million residents of Wuhan, China,” debunked the concept of asymptomatic transmission.
It stated that out of the nearly 10 million people in the study, “300 asymptomatic cases” were found. Contact tracing was then carried out and of those 300, no cases of COVID-19 were detected in any of them. “A total of 1,174 close contacts of the asymptomatic positive cases were traced, and they all tested negative for the COVID-19.”
Both the asymptomatic patients and their contacts were placed in isolation for two weeks, and after the fortnight, the results remained the same. “None of detected positive cases or their close contacts became symptomatic or newly confirmed with COVID-19 during the isolation period.”
Further evidence showed that “virus cultures” in the positive and repositive asymptomatic cases were all negative, “indicating no ‘viable virus’ in positive cases detected in this study.”
Ages of those found to be asymptomatic ranged between 10 and 89, with the asymptomatic positive rate being “lowest in children or adolescents aged 17 and below” and highest rate found among people older than 60.
The study also made the realization that due to a weakening of the virus itself, “newly infected persons were more likely to be asymptomatic and with a lower viral load than earlier infected cases.”
These results are not without precedent. In June, Dr. Maria Van Kerkhove, head of the World Health Organization’s (WHO) emerging diseases and zoonosis unit, shed doubt upon asymptomatic transmission. Speaking at a press conference, Van Kerkhove explained, “From the data we have, it still seems to be rare that an asymptomatic person actually transmits onward to a secondary individual.”
She then repeated the words “It’s very rare,” but despite her word choice of “rare,” Van Kerkhove could not point to a single case of asymptomatic transmission, noting that numerous reports “were not finding secondary transmission onward.”
Her comments went against the predominant narrative justifying lockdowns, and at the time the American Institute for Economic Research (AIER) highlighted that “she undermined the last bit of rationale there could be for lockdowns, mandated masks, social distancing regulation, and the entire apparatus of compulsion and coercion under which we’ve lived for three months.”
Swift to act, the WHO performed a U-turn, and the next day Van Kerkhove then declared that asymptomatic transmission was a “really complex question … We don’t actually have that answer yet.”
“I think that that’s misunderstanding to state that asymptomatic transmission globally is very rare. I was referring to a small subset of studies,” she added.
However, the new Wuhan study seems to present solid, scientific evidence that asymptomatic transmission is not just rare but nonexistent. Given that it found “no evidence that the identified asymptomatic positive cases were infectious,” the study raises important questions about lockdowns.
Commenting on the study, The Conservative Tree House noted that “all of the current lockdown regulations, mask wearing requirements and social distancing rules/decrees are based on a complete fallacy of false assumptions.” The evidence presented in the study shows that “‘very rare’ actually means ‘never’ asymptomatic spread just doesn’t happen – EVER.”
Such a large scientific study of 10 million people should not be overlooked, Jeffrey Tucker argued in the AIER, as it should be “huge news,” paving the way “to open up everything immediately.” Yet media reports have been virtually nonexistent and “ignored,” a fact that Tucker explained: “The lockdown lobby ignores whatever contradicts their narrative, preferring unverified anecdotes over an actual scientific study of 10 million residents in what was the world’s first major hotspot for the disease we are trying to manage.”
The recent findings should enable society to reopen once more, according to the AIER. Without asymptomatic transmission, “the whole basis for post-curve-flattening lockdowns,” life should resume and “we could take comfort in our normal intuition that healthy people can get out and about with no risk to others.”
It’s long past time for mass civil disobedience.
And I’m talking by the millions!
Believe me, it’s the only way we will return to sanity.
Share this message to wake up the sleeping masses!
Join the conversation!
Please share your thoughts about this article below. We value your opinions, and would love to see you add to the discussion!