Skip to main content may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on the site. Read our full Disclosure here.

Justice Alito Directs Pennsylvania Lawyers To Respond To Rep Kelly’s Emergency Injunction

The supreme court justice has asked the state of Pennsylvania to respond to an injunction, filed by representative Mike Kelly, by December 9th


Things are heating up folks

President Trumps legal team has been building a very significant case, and finding very significant evidence of voter fraud in multiple states across the country

As evidence mounts and the case builds, attorneys for the state of Pennsylvania were asked by Justice Alito to respond to representative Mike Kelly’s emergency injunction 

Unfortunatly the safe-harbor certification date for Pennsylvania is on December 8th

Trending: Did Joe Biden Really Say “I am not your President…Donald Trump is your President”?

99.9% Fine Silver MAGA Collector Coins!

This may however, end up being a part of an even larger case. 

Check it out: 

The Daily Wire had more on the story: 

Justice Samuel Alito agreed on Thursday to review an appeal against the ruling of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court that tossed a suit alleging the state’s mail-in voting was unconstitutional.

Rep. Mike Kelly (R-PA) and other plaintiffs appealed to Alito to block Pennsylvania from certifying the battleground state’s electoral votes for Democratic nominee Joe Biden, according to The Associated Press. The plaintiffs argue that Pennsylvania’s mail-in voting was inherently unconstitutional because it required a constitutional amendment to be authorized.

Alito set Dec. 9 as the date for state officials to respond. That date is a day after the “safe harbor deadline.” After Dec. 8, Congress cannot challenge any electors named according to state law.

As The Economist’s Supreme Court correspondent Steve Mazie noted, “Six days from now is an eternity on the electoral clock.

The Red State Observer also had more to say: 

The “Safe Harbor” provision for naming Electors is December 8.  What that means is that Congress must accept as valid — without allowing any challenge — the Electors named by a State on or before December 8 if those Electors were chosen in the manner prescribed by state law.  The Pennsylvania state officials are not, at this time, prevented by any court order from naming Electors for Joe Biden, and presumably, they will do so on or before December 8 as a result of the popular election which is the manner prescribed by the Pennsylvania legislature for naming Electors. That means those Electors must be accepted by Congress when the Electoral College reports the outcome of their vote.

Justice Alito’s order likely means there are not 5 votes to grant the emergency injunctive relief and prevent the naming of Pennsylvania’s electors — at least not with respect to the complaint filed by Congressman Kelly seeking to declare the entire “vote-by-mail” scheme enacted by the Pennsylvania legislature as a violation of Pennsylvania’s Constitution.

But the fact that he has ordered Pennsylvania to respond does suggest that there may be some sentiment in the Court to take up the case


Join the conversation!

Please share your thoughts about this article below. We value your opinions, and would love to see you add to the discussion!

We Love Trump
Thanks for sharing!
Send this to a friend