Skip to main content may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on the site. Read our full Disclosure here.

Democrat Mike Quigley: “Hearsay can be much better evidence than direct evidence”


Well, I think this guy failed law school.

Democrat Mike Quigley went on record today in Congress as saying “hearsay can be MUCH better evidence than direct evidence.”

Ummmm, wrong Mike.


You fail 1L Evidence class.

And in case you needed a refresher, let’s just give the definition of hearsay since you apparently didn’t learn it in law school.

Hearsay = “an out of court statement offered for the truth of the matter asserted.”

You’re welcome.

Hearsay is notoriously unreliable as evidence, which is why courts OF EVERY KIND do not allow it except in rare circumstances under an exception.  

And yet you think it’s better than direct evidence?

I think it’s time to revoke the old law degree buddy!

Watch him say it right here:

No one was really buying his BS:

Rep. Steve Scalise set him straight too:


And Rep. Gaetz:

READ MORE:  Here's Why President Trump Calls Him Liddle' Adam Schiff

Stay tuned folks!

This ship is going down hard and fast!

Bye bye impeachment nonsense, stick a fork in it this pig is DONE!

Proudly Support Trump!

The exact same hat our President wears!

Only while they last....

Check availability here.



Join the conversation!

Please share your thoughts about this article below. We value your opinions, and would love to see you add to the discussion!

We Love Trump
Thanks for sharing!