Report: Schiff’s Office Had Contact With Whistleblower Before Complaint Was Filed


14 views

This is a bombshell folks.

Everything that comes out of “Liddle’ Adam Schiff’s” mouth is seeming to be a lie!

Let’s have some fun with this one, because he is going DOWN!

Trending: Lin Wood: “The evidence is there, no one is speculating…the election was stolen and it WILL be undone!”

Here is Schifty Schiff saying he had no contact with the whistleblower:

From the YouTube description:

On 9/17/19, Rep. Adam Schiff said on Morning Joe that “we have not spoken directly with the whistleblower.” However, Patrick Boland, a spokesman for Rep. Adam Schiff, admitted to the New York Times, “like other whistle-blowers have done before and since under Republican and Democratic-controlled committees, the whistle-blower contacted the committee for guidance on how to report possible wrongdoing within the jurisdiction of the intelligence community.” Be sure to like, subscribe, and comment below to share your thoughts on the video.

Don Jr posted it too:

The only problem with that? 

Today the NY Times reported the whistleblower contacted Schiff's office well before filing the complaint!

The Democratic head of the House Intelligence Committee, Representative Adam B. Schiff of California, learned about the outlines of a C.I.A. officer’s concerns that President Trump had abused his power days before the officer filed a  whistle-blower complaint, according to a spokesman and current and former American officials.

The early account by the future whistle-blower shows how determined he was to make known his allegations that Mr. Trump asked Ukraine’s government to interfere on his behalf in the 2020 election. It also explains how Mr. Schiff knew to press for the complaint when the Trump administration initially blocked lawmakers from seeing it.

The C.I.A. officer approached a House Intelligence Committee aide with his concerns about Mr. Trump only after he had had a colleague first convey them to the C.I.A.’s top lawyer. Concerned about how that initial avenue for airing his allegations through the C.I.A. was unfolding, the officer then approached the House aide. In both cases, the original accusation was vague.

The House staff member, following the committee’s procedures, suggested the officer find a lawyer to advise him and meet with an inspector general, with whom he could file a whistle-blower complaint. The aide shared some of what the officer conveyed to Mr. Schiff. The aide did not share the whistle-blower’s identity with Mr. Schiff, an official said.


“Like other whistle-blowers have done before and since under Republican and Democratic-controlled committees, the whistle-blower contacted the committee for guidance on how to report possible wrongdoing within the jurisdiction of the intelligence community,” said Patrick Boland, a spokesman for Mr. Schiff.

In fact, many people believe Schifff IS the whistleblower in disguise.

Our friends at the Daily Wire summed it up nicely:

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, a Democrat from California, learned about the allegations that a CIA officer was wanting to make against President Donald Trump days before the officer filed an official whistleblower complaint.

“The early account by the future whistle-blower … explains how Mr. Schiff knew to press for the complaint when the Trump administration initially blocked lawmakers from seeing it,” The New York Times reported. “Before going to Congress, the C.I.A. officer had a colleague convey his accusations to the agency’s top lawyer. Concerned about how that avenue for airing his allegations was unfolding, the officer then approached a House Intelligence Committee aide, alerting him to the accusation against Mr. Trump. ”

The Times notes that the House staff member, who advised the CIA officer to get a lawyer and to file an official whistleblower complaint, informed Schiff of what the whistleblower was alleging against the president.

“The whistle-blower’s decision to offer what amounted to an early warning to the intelligence committee’s Democrats is also sure to thrust Mr. Schiff even more forcefully into the center of the controversy,” the Times added. “By the time the whistle-blower filed his complaint, Mr. Schiff and his staff knew at least vaguely what it contained.”

“We don’t call him shifty Schiff for nothing,” Trump said on Wednesday. “He’s a shifty, dishonest guy.”

Trump slammed Schiff for fabricating quotes from the phone call with Ukraine during a committee hearing last week, which earned Schiff widespread criticism.

“Congressman Adam Schiff should resign for the Crime of, after reading a transcript of my conversation with the President of Ukraine (it was perfect), fraudulently fabricating a statement of the President of the United States and reading it to Congress, as though mine!” Trump tweeted. “He is sick!”

“Adam Schiff should only be so lucky to have the brains, honor and strength of Secretary of State Mike Pompeo,” Trump added. “For a lowlife like Schiff, who completely fabricated my words and read them to Congress as though they were said by me, to demean a First in Class at West Point, is SAD!”

Schiff appeared on numerous Sunday morning news programs, where he repeatedly lied about the contents of the transcript of Trump’s phone call with Ukraine, saying that Trump tried “to try to coerce that leader to manufacture dirt on his opponent and interfere in our election” which happened “at a time when the president is withholding hundreds of millions of dollars in assistance to Ukraine.”

Watch:

And from Rush:

RUSH: There's a story here from the New York Times. I've had three people send me this with all kinds of bells and whistles attached to it so I would notice it. It is a New York Times story, and essentially as I read this -- and I'm being serious here, now -- it looks like this whole whistleblower thing is an Adam Schiff setup.

Now, I’ll share with you here the nuts and bolts of the story. I just got this, I haven't had a chance to apply my natural media analysis touched with skepticism, so this is just an on-the-fly report to you.

“The Democratic head of the House Intelligence Committee, Representative Adam B. Schiff of California, learned about the outlines of a C.I.A. officer’s concerns that President Trump had abused his power days before the officer filed a whistleblower complaint, according to a spokesman and current and former American officials.”

The same old nameless, anonymous people. I think they just cut and paste this in now. “According to a spokesman and current and former American officials.” It could be anybody, but we go on.

“The early account by the future whistleblower shows how determined he was to make known his allegations that Mr. Trump asked Ukraine’s government to interfere on his behalf in the 2020 election. It also explains how Mr. Schiff knew to press for the complaint when the Trump administration initially blocked lawmakers from seeing it.”

Let me give you the upshot. The guy was not a whistleblower. He went to Adam Schiff first. As I read it, this story is a story trying to praise Schiff, by the way. This is not a story that's uncovering unsavory behavior by Schiff. This is a New York Times' attempt to praise Schiff for really sharp political maneuvering and thinking.

Apparently what happened is the person we know as the whistleblower was not a whistleblower. He went to Adam Schiff after he'd been told secondhand what had happened on the phone call. He went to Schiff. Schiff is who had him fill out the whistleblower form. The guy did not do it on his own initiative.

And the CIA officer is who the New York Times again identifies here. A CIA officer in the White House went to Adam Schiff, much like Christine Blasey Ford went to Dianne Feinstein! Before going to Congress, the CIA officer had a colleague convey his allegations to the agency's top lawyer.

So the upshot that the New York Times does not want us to conclude is that he was not a whistleblower, that this was an act of collusion. Adam Schiff is colluding with this guy and suggested that he become a whistleblower, and right here it's clearly stated that Schiff did not expect Trump to release the transcript! That was the original play to call Trump a stonewaller. Or to say that he was obstructing or, at best, covering up. So we shall see.

USA, USA!

NATIONAL POLL: Is CNN The Enemy Of The People?

Now THAT is a good looking hat!

Only while they last!

Check availability here.

free_usa_45_hat_1200x628.jpg



Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!
Send this to a friend