Skip to main content may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on the site. Read our full Disclosure here.

NY Post OpEd: “Actually, We Can’t Afford NOT To Build The Wall”

Exactly right!


I came across a wondeful Opinion piece today from the New York Post, titled “Actually, we can’t afford not to build the Wall”.

And when I looked closer to see who wrote it, I saw it was from Betsy McCaughey, a former lieutenant governor of New York.

So this is someone who knows her stuff and has held key positions in government before.

And she’s saying very clearly:  Trump is right!

From the NY Post, please read what she had to say:

President Trump launched another battle for border security on Monday, calling for $8.6 billion in funding for the Wall in his proposed federal budget for next year. Predictably, top Democrats came out swinging, bashing a border wall as “expensive and ineffective.”

Truth is, the Democrats aren’t leveling with the public about the billions we are already forced to spend on shelters, food, diapers, medical care and child care for migrants sneaking across the border and claiming asylum. Not to mention the costs of public schooling and health care provided free to migrants once they are released into communities.

By deterring illegal crossings, the Wall will pay for itself in less than two years. It’s a bargain.

Look what it costs us when a Central American teenager crosses the border illegally without an adult. Uncle Sam spends a staggering $775 per day for each teen housed at a shelter at Florida’s Homestead Air Reserve Base.

There they get medical care, schooling and recreation. They stay, on average, 67 days before being released to a sponsor. Now do the math. That’s almost $52,000 per teen. American parents would appreciate the government spending that money on their kids. Imagine the government handing you a check for $52,000 to defray the costs of raising your teenager.

There are bigger costs ahead. The number of illegal border-crossers just hit an 11-year high. More than 76,000 people in February alone. US and Mexican officials predict hundreds of thousands more in the coming months.

The migrants use the word “asylum” as their get-in-free card. When they say it to a border agent, they gain entry to the US 80 percent of the time, according to Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen. The government temporarily houses them before eventually releasing them with an immigration court date. But half never go on to file an asylum claim, instead disappearing into all parts of the US, former Attorney General Jeff Sessions noted.

They are turning asylum into a scam, in other words. The system is meant to protect victims of persecution. Such as Cubans fleeing Castro’s prisons. Now it’s overwhelmed by Central Americans escaping poverty for a lifestyle upgrade.

Legal immigrants also want to better their circumstances, but they play by the rules. What a slap in the face to see migrants jump the line.

Unfortunately, a federal appeals court just made the asylum hoax even easier. Last week, the left-leaning Ninth Circuit ruled that migrants who fail to convince border authorities they face danger in their home country still have a “right” to a day in court in the US. That bizarre ruling won’t stand. Another circuit court ruled the opposite way in 2016, clarifying that a border agent’s decision is final. Entering the US, the court held, is a privilege, not a right. The Supreme Court let that earlier decision stand, so count on the Supremes to reverse the Ninth Circuit.

In the meantime, though, taxpayers are getting fleeced by caravans of fake asylum seekers.

Even before the latest surge, the Department of Homeland Security was spending more than $3 billion a year sheltering and feeding illegals at the border, double the cost in 2011.

Add to that the hundreds of millions being spent caring for unaccompanied teenagers in 130 shelters overseen by the Department of Health and Human Services.

Trump has tried several strategies to protect taxpayers from these rip-offs. First, he barred illegal migrants from asking for asylum, requiring that asylum seekers enter the country through official ports of entry. That would have reduced their numbers considerably. But in November, a federal district judge, also from the Ninth Circuit, nixed the president’s regulation.

Then Trump devised a “Remain-in-Mexico” arrangement to make Mexico the waiting room for asylum seekers. As long as they are south of the border, the US doesn’t have to house them, and they have no “right” to public schooling and emergency medical care on our tab. The program, if successful, will save American taxpayers a bundle. It’s one way Mexico is already helping to pay for the Wall.

Democrats claim it’s a waste to spend billions on a wall. But the facts show that we can’t afford not to build it. As the cover of the president’s new budget says, “taxpayers first.”

Great article, thank you!

You're exactly right!

May the rest of America (and especially the Supreme Court) wake up and understand this too!

Please feel free to share this article with your family and friends who need to be informed before voting in 2020.

You can copy and paste the link to this article and send it by email or share it on Facebook, or use the sharing icons at the top of the page.

This information is important and needs to get out!

We've got the FREE MAGA hat! 💥 Only while they last!

Want one?

Please limit one per person.

Check availability here.


We Love Trump
Thanks for sharing!
Send this to a friend