Here’s How Liberals Plan To “Remove”Justice Thomas!

Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas has been a target for liberals over the last three decades because he stands up for the Constitution.

Liberals are now so infuriated with him that they are even attempting to remove him!

A group of liberal activists is attempting to push a new piece of judicial reform that would eliminate the Conservative majority of the U.S. Supreme Court.

The group pushing that is pushing the new reform is called the Project on Government Oversight and Lawyers Defending American Democracy.

SCOTUS Conservative Majority Could Be Taken Away Under This 'Model'

Because Democrats try to change the rules any time they aren’t winning.https://t.co/fo1sbEzlKb

— Jenna Ellis (@JennaEllisEsq) March 16, 2023

An attack directed right at Justice Thomas. https://t.co/fo1sbEzTzJ

— Jenna Ellis (@JennaEllisEsq) March 16, 2023

The Conservative Brief broke the new reform down:

Left-wing activists running judicial reform groups are attempting to push a new “model” that would, if adopted, dilute the conservative majority of the U.S. Supreme Court.

Democrats have not had any luck in recent years expanding the U.S. Supreme Court, so some argue this new “plan” is the Left’s way of diluting the current 6-3 Republican-appointed majority on the nation’s highest court.

Project on Government Oversight and Lawyers Defending American Democracy have proposed a new “model” ethics code that could thrust Republican-appointed Justice Clarence Thomas further into the political limelight.

“The proposed guidelines from so-called independent government watchdogs Project on Government Oversight and Lawyers Defending American Democracy would put in place ‘more stringent guidelines for recusal.’ The guidelines would be so strict that if they were in effect last year, it may have prevented the high court’s eldest Republican-appointed justice, Thomas, from participating in a case involving the release of Trump administration records to the House committee investigating the Jan. 6 Capitol riot,” the Washington Examiner reported.

“Such a provision would clearly have forbidden Justice Clarence Thomas from participating” in the 2022 case, NPR’s Nina Totenberg reported Thursday.

This would destroy the Court.https://t.co/24ZcQHPlf2

— Sebastian Gorka DrG (@SebGorka) March 16, 2023

This would destroy the Court.

Is there anything liberals don't want to tear down?https://t.co/tFAwCFSm1w

— Conservative Brief (@ConservBrief) March 16, 2023

Even MSBC is pushing for Thomas to be impeached:

Only one Supreme Court justice has been impeached. Clarence Thomas could be the second. https://t.co/mGQPM8p6q3

— MSNBC (@MSNBC) March 17, 2023

Read MSNBC’s report:

Today, we agree that a judge cannot, and should not, be removed simply because we disagree with their rulings. But we should then also agree that if judges are violating ethics or subject to conflicts of interest, they should in theory be impeached and removed from the bench.

Elie Mystal: Justice Thomas is lone dissenter on issues that may implicate his wife in Jan. 6
JAN. 21, 202207:47
Which brings us back to Justice Clarence Thomas. In January, The New Yorker’s Jane Mayer profiled Thomas’ wife, Ginni, a longtime conservative operative and lobbyist, and revealed how her lobbying firm was on the payroll of far-right activist Frank Gaffney’s Center for Security Policy. Gaffney and others submitted an amicus brief to the court in 2017 in support of the Trump administration’s travel ban, arguing that “the challenge of Islam must be confronted.”

Shockingly, Thomas did not recuse himself from the case given the clear financial conflict. He never even disclosed the $200,000 paid to his wife despite being required to report the source of a spouse’s income as part of his annual financial disclosures, according to The New Yorker. Thomas would later join his fellow four conservative justices in voting to uphold Trump’s shameful Muslim ban.

In February, The New York Times Magazine reported that Ginni Thomas served on the board of a secretive right-wing group called CNP Action. In November 2020, it circulated a “November ‘action steps’ document” instructing its members in the days after the election “to pressure Republican lawmakers into challenging the election results and appointing alternate slates of electors,” according to the report.