Balenciaga’s Child Trafficking Connection

This is a guest post by ConcreteConspiracy — find more from Concrete Conspiracy on Substack here.

This article contains statements and commentary which are the opinion of Concrete Conspiracy.

Many of you have heard the rumors of a potential connection between Balenciaga and child trafficking. Like always, the media has been shutting it down, censoring everything that is in the open. I wanted to post about this somewhere but knew that if I posted it on Instagram, it would probably be removed, so I’ve decided to put my research into this article.

Every time something like this comes out, more of the world is being woken up. First, there were the WikiLeaks emails, then Pizzagate, then Jeffery Epstein, then Wayfair, and now finally Balenciaga(there have been more, but these have been the most popular ones).

In this article, I will just be asking a lot of questions. I don’t prefer to draw conclusions, that’s your job. Read this and do your research. Find out for yourself what is the truth and what is the lie.

WARNING: VERY DISTURBING CONTENT! PROCEED WITH CAUTION!

Let’s go down this rabbit hole…

It all started mid-November when people started noticing that Balenciaga featured some unsavory images. The pictures promoting Balenciaga’s “holiday” products are unsettling and, with a deeper analysis of the smaller details, it only gets worse.

The images while no longer displayed on the homepage, the original full-size image links are all still accessible and live, being hosted by Kering, Balenciaga’s parent company. You can find these here: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16,

Let’s start to analyze the first(1) image:

In this picture, the girl is standing on a bed while holding a plush toy bag in bondage gear. The bear is wearing a padlock across its neck, a fishnet top, a harness, and all kinds of straps. Needless to say, this gear is used in hardcore BDSM sex that revolves around pain, submission, and humiliation.

So the question is, why is this child holding this kind of toy?

This stuffed animal represents a literal sex slave, as symbolized by the collar and padlock.

In a BDSM context, a collar is a device of any material worn by a person around the neck to indicate their submissive or slave status in a BDSM relationship.

Collars may be used in role-playing games involving erotic humiliation because they have connotations of control and pet-like status, especially when worn with a leash. – Wikipedia, Collar (BDSM)

Notice that the definition above mentions “pet-like status, especially when worn with a leash”. Coincidentally enough, there’s an actual leash on the girl’s bed. And I don’t see a dog in sight.

A few more things(This is just my analysis)…

• Moon shapes hanging from the back of the bed(has symbolism connected to satanic rituals).
• The only letters you can see from the mat that is supposed to say “Balenciaga” says “CIA”.
• The logo for Balenciaga on the child’s shirt is almost exactly the logo for Bernie Sanders’s 2020 presidential campaign(more on this later).
• Another bondage bear toy is on her dresser.
• Many things associated with cats and rabbits are found all over the room(potentially symbols and a connection to mkultra).
• 6 Black dragons on the wall(why would this be in a girl’s room, 6 black dragons is also symbolic when it comes to rituals).

Here are the next two images(2 and 3):

The vibe of this room doesn’t look good at all!

My analysis:

• The girl doesn’t seem to be alright.
• The picture combines kiddie stuff with adult stuff(champagne glasses, beer cans, and candles). Why is this stuff in a girl’s room?
• More pet stuff like a dog leash and bowl(In BDSM, submissive slaves drink out of such bowls. Are they implying that the girl drinks out of that bowl? This interpretation would be a “stretch” if there weren’t two toys in full BDSM gear in the same picture.)

If you thought the first three were bad, wait till you see the next one!

Next(4):

Note: You might need to zoom in to see some of the things I am pointing out to you in this image.

• All over the room, we can see some of the kid’s drawings, many of which would indicate that this kid is disturbed. From creepy rabbits, scary teeth, and a depressed child holding something on the left, to the devil on the right.
• We have another BDSM bear on the ground.
• Right next to the boy on the left side, we see another beer can with a candle.
• We have a chair in the back with caution tape wrapped around it.
• If we look to the left of the mat he is standing on there is the “caution” tape that is supposed to say “Balenciaga”, instead it looks to say BAAL-enciaga. That defiantly is not a coincidence. Just wait, it gets worse…

Next(5 and 6):

This image seems practically normal, right? Wrong! Look at the writing on the paper below the purse. Here is a zoomed-in version:

This court document is talking about child pornography! The document is actually the Supreme Court ruling Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition.

This specific ruling was not chosen by mistake. It fits perfectly the insane child abuse theme of the Balenciaga campaign. Indeed, Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition reverses a significant portion of the Child Pornography Prevention Act of 1996.

A provision of the Child Pornography Prevention Act of 1996 (CPPA) (18 USCS 2252A(a)) prohibited the possession or distribution of “child pornography,” which was defined in another CPPA provision (18 USCS 2256(8)(B)) as including any visual depiction that “is, or appears to be, of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct.” Thus, 2256(8)(B) banned a range of sexually explicit images, sometimes called “virtual child pornography,” that appeared to depict minors but were produced by means other than using real children, as, for example, computer-generated images and images of adults who looked like minors.
– LexiNesis, Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition

The Supreme Court ruled that the ban on “virtual child pornography” violated free speech so it was reversed. In other words, it was a win for the pedos. And that’s why this specific document was in that Balenciaga photo. They want more judicial victories. This document on the bottom should be NO COINCIDENCE!

Do you think it can’t get any worse? Sorry, it does!

Next(7-16):

Is this just another normal Balenciaga photo?

Let’s take a closer look at the books in the back:

The book on the top is from Michael Borremans. Once again, the presence of this book is not random. It perfectly fits the overarching theme. Michael Borremans’ most famous work is titled Fire From the Sun.

This painting is titled Five Figures, Three Limbs.

In the painting above, we see naked children that are covered in blood and three limbs on the floor. If you look closely, above the limbs, we see a translucent figure crouching above the limbs. Kim Noble, a survivor of trauma-based mind control who paints symbolic images, uses the same imagery to depict the concept of dissociation (used in mind control). In other words, these children are being traumatized and they’re dissociating.

Here’s a description of this series of paintings.

In the most evident terms, Fire From The Sun portrays children aged two or three in various stages of play with fire and what appear to be human limbs, even hair. The children are all light-skinned Sistine-style cherubs, sometimes covered in blood. The children do not appear to be distressed or disturbed (though some viewers at the gallery may be). The drama of the paintings is heightened by their visual connection to each other—and, more broadly, to older works by Borremans. The scene in each painting is composed against a similar beige backdrop. This is a set or a stage, devoid of context, withholding of answers, but suggestive of a director or someone watching.
– Elephant, Michaël Borremans: Fire from the Sun

As the description above stated, this scene takes place on a stage and is suggestive of a “director” watching. This is truly psychopathic. What if these paintings were based on something that happened in reality?

More references to dissociation.

In some of the paintings the children are in the process of disappearing: phantom bodies not quite removed from their gruesome acts. Importantly, Borremans chose to depict children too young to have clear memories. In some fictional future, they might be unreliable carriers of this formative origin story or trauma.
– Ibid.

The description above, from an art website, actually refers to the trauma of children – a core concept of Monarch programming.

In the image above, the children play with their limbs and eat them.

While the fire and (probable) cannibalism imply some sort of ritual, the works are most chilling as sketches of random violence, causal and instinctual. The depicted characters break with one typecast (angelic) while fitting another (demonic).
– Ibid.

More cannibalism is shown in the image above.

The next few images show satanic rituals:

This image shows hooded figures carrying burning limbs.

This one shows people in black hoods around an animal(just like a satanic ritual)!

This one shows a ritualistic robe + a miniature version of the figure = MK ULTRA alter persona.

I could post pictures all day but I believe you get the picture. Borremans’ work revolves around trauma, abuse, rituals, cannibalism, and a whole lot of naked children being watched by some freak. In other words, this is all about the sickness of the occult elite. And this is why his book was featured in the Balenciaga pic.

I will post part two on this talking about the connections between Balenciaga and the government, celebrities, and the elite. Stay tuned for more!

Please share!

This article contains statements and commentary which are the opinion of Concrete Conspiracy.

This is a guest post by ConcreteConspiracy — find more from Concrete Conspiracy on Substack here.