FBI Whistleblower Document Targets “Misinformation” and “Disinformation” as ‘Election Crimes’

An FBI document titled “2022 Midterm Elections Social Media Analysis Cheat Sheet” details what FBI agents should look out for leading up to November 8th.

The whistleblower document, leaked to Project Veritas, lists “misinformation” as a potential election crime, describing it as “false or misleading information spread mistakenly or unintentionally.”

The document also lists “disinformation” as a potential election crime, describing it as “false or inaccurate information intended to mislead others.”

“Disinformation campaigns on social media are used to deliberately confuse, trick, or upset the public,” the document also stated.

But of course, the FBI reminded its agents that the First Amendment and Fourth Amendment exist, under the “Things to Consider” section of the document.

Do they really consider Americans’ constitutional rights?

BREAKING: From Project Veritas! FBI Whistleblower Leaks Document Showing Agency Targeting ‘Misinformation’ Under ‘Election Crimes’ Ahead of 2022 Midterm Elections!! pic.twitter.com/AXezUKLPzb

— Harmeet K. Dhillon (@pnjaban) October 27, 2022

Project Veritas wrote:

Recently, the Biden administration attempted to create the “Disinformation Governance Board” under the Department of Homeland Security. After severe pushback from the public due to free speech concerns, the federal government pulled the plug on this idea.

99.9% Pure Investor Grade Silver Trump Collector Coins!

In another section of the leaked document labelled “Things to Consider,” the FBI reminded its agents that the First Amendment and Fourth Amendment exist. Both amendments are in the Bill of Rights and protect Americans’ rights to free speech and against “unreasonable” searches or seizures.

The Bureau also flagged the potential for “Voter/Ballot Fraud” in this election, an activity that some have attempted to rule out as a threat to the American electoral system.

Zero Hedge questioned:

Does a Hillary Clinton-approved media blitz disinformation campaign to smear her political opponent as a Russian asset count?

What about “MSM censorship campaigns to suppress damaging information about a candidate” such as Hunter Biden’s laptop?

Shouldn’t these fall under “things to consider?”