Trust the Science, Natural Immunity Protects Against Omicron Better Than 3 Pfizer Doses

“Trust the science,” they say.

What Anthony Fauci and his cronies really mean by this is to trust them, even when they’ve already thrown science out the window.

We’ve already seen proof time and time again that the vaccine is bogus, but a new study by the New England Journal of Medicine only strengthens that fact.

The study, which was funded by Cornell University, reveals that natural immunity is more effective than 3 shots of the Pfizer vaccination.

This begs the question…

Why the heck is everyone talking about a fifth booster shot?..

Who knew??
NONE of their "Fauci-science" can be trusted!https://t.co/EEkyEFDrb3

— Marji Wojcik 🇺🇸 (@DesignsonTruth) July 19, 2022

Here’s more on this key finding from the Stream:

“A key finding was that a history of vaccination with the standard two doses of either the Pfizer or Moderna mRNA vaccine, but no history of prior infection, brought no significant protection against symptomatic Omicron infection,” researchers said.

In regards to the Pfizer vaccine, three shots offered considerably more protection. But the protection was still lower than natural immunity, which offered stronger and more sustained protection from infection than vaccination. (Researchers noted that “people with a prior-variant infection were moderately protected from Omicron with little decline in protection even a year after their prior infection.”)

The findings are not unlike those out of Israel published last year, which found that natural immunity offered more robust protection against the Delta variant than vaccines.

“The natural immune protection that develops after a SARS-CoV-2 infection offers considerably more of a shield against the Delta variant of the pandemic coronavirus than two doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine,” Science reported in August 2021 in a piece exploring the Israel findings.

More than a dozen other studies also found that natural immunity offered powerful protection against Covid, equal to or stronger than vaccination.

Study in NEJM:

Prior Covid infection conferred better protection against symptomatic Omicron *more than a year after infection* than 3 doses of vaccine >1 month after the third dose/boosterhttps://t.co/a6lLAYPbnJ pic.twitter.com/dMnyJBurTL

— David Zweig (@davidzweig) July 11, 2022

“Among the most fraudulent messages of the CDC's campaign of deceit is to force the vaccine on those with prior infection, who have a greater degree of protection against all versions of the virus than those with any of the vaccines.”

15 studies show…https://t.co/oXaI3L0Y3S

— Thomas Massie (@RepThomasMassie) August 26, 2021

Of course, none of this is new.

Last year, 15 different studies proved that natural immunity was far more effective than the vaccines.

The Blaze reported on those studies last August:

It’s the 800-pound gorilla in the pandemic. The debate over forced vaccination with an ever-waning vaccine is cresting right around the time when the debate should be moot for a lot of people. Among the most fraudulent messages of the CDC’s campaign of deceit is to force the vaccine on those with prior infection, who have a greater degree of protection against all versions of the virus than those with any of the vaccines. It’s time to set the record straight once and for all that natural immunity to SARS-CoV-2 is broader, more durable, and longer-lasting than any of the shots on the market today. Our policies must reflect that reality.

It should be noted that this exercise is not even necessary now that our own government concedes that immunity from the vaccines, particularly the Pfizer shot, wanes each month. With the Mayo Clinic researchers suggesting, based on old data that likely got even worse since, that Pfizer’s efficacy against infection is only 42%, there is no reason to even attempt to compare this degree of immunity to the near-perfect immunity of prior infection, even against Delta. It should be obvious to any intellectually honest person that an unvaccinated individual with prior infection is exponentially safer to be around than someone who had the vaccines but not prior infection.

In spite of all of this readily available information, the talking heads are already discussing a fifth booster shot!

VIDEO – Lemon: Are We Going to Get a Fifth Vaccine Shot? https://t.co/6RhxG4yM3Q

— Grabien (@GrabienMedia) July 12, 2022

Importantly, the Cornell University-funded study found that both natural immunity and vaccines offer “strong and durable protection” against Covid-related hospitalization and death.@miltimore79 explains: https://t.co/1hREzYuag8

— FEE (Foundation for Economic Education) (@feeonline) July 18, 2022

The truth is right in front of everybody.

You need only look.

“natural immunity . . . offered stronger and more sustained protection from [COVID] infection than vaccination."https://t.co/ZasY96pg3i

— Rand Paul (@RandPaul) July 18, 2022

Study in New England Journal of Medicine:

Effectiveness from previous infection: 46.1%
2 squirts: -1.1%
3 squirts: 52.2% but wanes in weeks.

Natural immunity hasn't waned yet.https://t.co/O9OEnfzLap

— Marc Mongrain (@Lukathor) July 19, 2022

Before the liberal media and Democrat politicians insist on more vaccine mandates, read the science. https://t.co/5krcuqtoyO

— Carl DeMaio (@carldemaio) July 20, 2022

“More than a dozen studies found that natural immunity offered powerful protection against Covid, equal to or stronger than vaccination.” #covid19 https://t.co/VDEhznx9SN

— Douglas Karr (@douglaskarr) July 18, 2022

So, what’s all this really about?..

The Issue with natural immunity is no one gets wealthy. pic.twitter.com/tgOHWoZcJv

— Jeremy Roop (@HunterArrowhead) July 21, 2022