Skip to main content
We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here.

Pfizer Looks to Intervene in Lawsuit to Obtain COVID-19 Jab Data From FDA


As WLT noted, in a lawsuit seeking all of the documents the FDA utilized to license Pfizer’s COVID-19 jab, the FDA requested a federal judge let them release the data over 55 years. 

The federal judge denied the agency’s request to release 500 pages per month and ordered the FDA to produce 55,000 pages per month starting on March 1st.

But the FDA has now requested the court delay the release of the first 55,000 pages until May. 

And look who has suddenly joined the lawsuit to ‘expedite’ the review of the documents.


The pharmaceutical company whose product is up for scrutiny by independent scientists suddenly wants to ensure outside sources have speedier access to their data.

Sounds believable. 

Pfizer’s intervention in the lawsuit will likely make obtaining transparency for its experimental product forced on millions of Americans harder to acquire.

Aaron Siri explained in Injecting Freedom:

NATIONAL POLL: Do You Trust Fox News?

The FDA’s excuse?  As explained in the brief opposing the FDA’s request, the FDA’s defense effectively amounts to claiming that the 11 document reviewers it has already assigned and the 17 additional reviewers being onboarded are only capable of reading at the speed of preschoolers.


As the FDA tries to obtain months of delay, guess who just showed upon in the lawsuit?  Yep, Pfizer.  And it is represented by a global chair and team from a law firm with thousands of lawyers.  Pfizer’s legal bill will likely be multiple times what it would cost the FDA to simply hire a private document review company to review, redact, and produce the documents at issue.  Within weeks, if not days.

Pfizer is coming in as a third party.  But Pfizer assures the Court it is here to help expedite production of the documents.  Sure it is!  Where was Pfizer before the Court ordered the 55,000 pages per month?  Right, doing what it normally does: letting the government work on its behalf – like the way the government mandates, promotes, and defends Pfizer’s product.

But the government did not please Pfizer this time and so here it comes, likely looking for a second bite at the apple.  Of course the FDA consented to Pfizer appearing.

Read the opposition to the FDA’s Motion by Siri’s firm here.


Join the conversation!

Please share your thoughts about this article below. We value your opinions, and would love to see you add to the discussion!

Hey, Noah here!

Wondering where we went?

Read this and bookmark our new site!

See you over there!

Thanks for sharing!