Skip to main content
We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here.

Who Are the REAL Criminals? Pfizer Settled in Court For $75 Million For Using ‘Nigerian Children As Human Guinea Pigs’


Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla had the audacity to say those who spread ‘misinformation’ about the COVID-19 jabs are criminals.

Oh, really?

Talk about projection.

The man who heads the corporation that paid the largest criminal fine in history wants to define who’s a criminal.

Pfizer’s marketing team got behind their projecting CEO and took shots at those sounding the alarm over these dangerous injections.

Pfizer makes the drug cartels operating along the U.S. southern border look like amateurs.

To give you an example of Pfizer’s wickedness, let’s dive into their past sins.

Because the COVID-19 injections aren’t the first time they’ve used humans as lab rats.

Watch this video for a glimpse into Pfizer’s dark history:

From the New York Times:

Thirty Nigerian families sued Pfizer in federal court yesterday, saying the company conducted an unethical clinical trial of an antibiotic on their children in 1996. It is the first suit in the United States seeking damages from an American pharmaceutical company for what the plaintiffs say was medical experimentation on foreign citizens without their consent.

During a meningitis epidemic in 1996, Pfizer treated 100 Nigerian children with the antibiotic Trovan as part of its effort to determine whether the drug, which had never been tested in children, would be an effective treatment for the disease. Pfizer treated 100 other children with ceftriaxone, the gold standard for meningitis treatment, but, the suit says, at a lower-than-recommended dose. Eleven children in the trial died, and others suffered brain damage, were partly paralyzed or became deaf.

Vanessa McGowan, a spokeswoman for Pfizer, said yesterday that the company had not yet seen the suit, which was filed in Federal District Court in Manhattan, and could not comment on the allegations. In the past, Pfizer has said that the number of deaths in the Nigerian Trovan trial was lower than the overall fatality rate for the meningitis epidemic and that the trial had been a philanthropic effort that benefited most of the sick children, not a self-serving effort to obtain quick clinical data, as the suit contends.

The Washington Post obtained a copy of a confidential Nigerian government report relating to the case.

Below are a few excerpts from a 2006 article published by The Post:

A panel of Nigerian medical experts has concluded that Pfizer Inc. violated international law during a 1996 epidemic by testing an unapproved drug on children with brain infections at a field hospital.


The report concludes that Pfizer never obtained authorization from the Nigerian government to give the unproven drug to nearly 100 children and infants. Pfizer selected the patients at a field hospital in the city of Kano, where the children had been taken to be treated for an often deadly strain of meningitis. At the time, Doctors Without Borders was dispensing approved antibiotics at the hospital.

Pfizer’s experiment was “an illegal trial of an unregistered drug,” the Nigerian panel concluded, and a “clear case of exploitation of the ignorant.”

The test came to public attention in December 2000, when The Post published the results of a year-long investigation into overseas pharmaceutical testing. The news was met in Nigeria with street demonstrations, lawsuits and demands for reform.

Pfizer contended that its researchers traveled to Kano with a purely philanthropic motive, to help fight the epidemic, which ultimately killed more than 15,000 Africans. The committee rejected that explanation, pointing out that Pfizer physicians completed their trial and left while “the epidemic was still raging.”

The panel said an oral form of Trovan, the Pfizer drug used in the test, had apparently never been given to children with meningitis. There are no records documenting that Pfizer told the children or their parents that they were part of an experiment, it said. An approval letter from a Nigerian ethics committee, which Pfizer used to justify its actions had been concocted and backdated by the company’s lead researcher in Kano, the report said.


The panel recommended that Pfizer be “sanctioned appropriately” and directed to issue “an unreserved apology to the government and people of Nigeria.” The company should also pay an unspecified amount of restitution, the report said. The panel recommended that Nigeria enact reforms to prevent a recurrence.

So, I’ll direct this question to Mr. Bourla.

Who are the REAL criminals?


Join the conversation!

Please share your thoughts about this article below. We value your opinions, and would love to see you add to the discussion!

Hey, Noah here!

Wondering where we went?

Read this and bookmark our new site!

See you over there!

Thanks for sharing!